The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonword Repetition and Child Language Impairment
Abstract
A brief, processing-dependent, nonword repetition task, designed to minimize biases associated with traditional language tests, was investigated. In Study 1, no overlap in nonword repetition performance was found between a group of 20 school-age children enrolled in language intervention (LI) and a group of 20 age-matched peers developing language normally (LN). In Study 2, a comparison of likelihood ratios for the nonword repetition task and for a traditional language test revealed that nonword repetition distinguished between children independently identified as LI and LN with a high degree of accuracy, by contrast with the traditional language test. Nonword repetition may have considerable clinical utility as a screening measure for language impairment in children. Information on the likelihood ratios associated with all diagnostic tests of language is badly needed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“as for non-word repetition, the results were not sufficiently consistent across different studies, so it cannot be considered as an accurate diagnostic tool if used individually”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Citations
Cites
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,183
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3435 · Cited by 4,103
Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90004-j · Cited by 1,487
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315804682 · Cited by 1,111
Paradise, J. L., Rockette, H. E., Colborn, D. K., Bernard, B. S., Smith, C. G., Kurs‐Lasky, M., & Janosky, J. E. (1997) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.99.3.318 · Cited by 778
Daneman, M. (1994) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099403700409 · Cited by 763
Bishop, D., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01420.x · Cited by 693
Test of Nonverbal Intelligence
Brown, L. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_10 · Cited by 673
Selection of Children with Specific Language Deficits
Stark, R. E., & Tallal, P. A. (1981) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.4602.114 · Cited by 489
A System for the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., & Zhang, X. (1996) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3906.1284 · Cited by 429
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Akmajian A., 1995, Linguistics
- Dunn L., 1981, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised
- Edwards J. & Lahey M. (1996 June). Why do children with specific language impairment repeat nonwords less accurately than their peers? Poster session presented at the 17th Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders University of Wisconsin–Madison.
- Hammill D., 1988, Test of Language Development 2 Intermediate
- Kay Elemetrics Corporation, 1994, CSL: Computerized Speech Laboratory, Model 4300B
- Newcomer P., 1988, Test of Language Development 2 Primary
- Shriberg L. D., 1982, Clinical phonetics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Boudreau, D. M., & Costanza-Smith, A. (2011) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0088 · Cited by 23
Specific language or working memory impairments: A small scale observational study
Archibald, L. M. D., Joanisse, M. F., & Edmunds, A. L. (2011) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659010396779 · Cited by 23
“Deficits in the ability to repeat non-words have been reported consistently for SLI groups (e.g. Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998; Conti-Ramsden, 2003; Montgomery, 2004; Archibald and Gathercole, 2006).”
BackgroundPhonological memory training and its effect on second language vocabulary development
Καρούσου, Α., & Nerantzaki, T. (2020) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658319898514 · Cited by 23
“, 1996) suggesting that the deficits in nonword repetition found in children with Specific Language Impairment (e.g. Bishop et al., 1996; Botting and Conti-Ramsden, 2001; Conti-Ramsden et al., 2001; Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998; Weismer et al., 2000) are highly heritable – and therefore not strongly affected by enviro…”
BackgroundPavelko, S. L., & Owens, R. E. (2019) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-18-0050 · Cited by 23
Wray, A. H., & Weber-Fox, C. M. (2013) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.002 · Cited by 23
“All participants performed within the normal range on the Nonword Repetition Task (Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998), indicating normal phonological processing abilities.”
Park, J., Ritter, M. J., Lombardino, L. J., Wiseheart, R., & Sherman, S. (2013) · International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning · doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2013.534 · Cited by 23
“Over the past two decades researchers have established a strong relationship between language learning difficulties in children with SLI and verbal working memory (Archibald & Joanisse, 2009; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990).”
BackgroundThe nature of phonological representations in children with Grammatical-specific language impairment
Marshall, C. R., Harris, J., & van der Lely, H. (2003) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 23
McCabe, P., Preston, J. L., Evans, P., & Heard, R. (2023) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00144 · Cited by 23
Comprehension of novel metaphor in young children with Developmental Language Disorder
Bühler, D., Perovic, A., & Pouscoulous, N. (2018) · Autism & Developmental Language Impairments · doi:10.1177/2396941518817229 · Cited by 22
“Scores on the NWR task have been argued to successfully identify children’s language status with regard to DLD with a high degree of accuracy (Bishop, North, & Donlan, 1996; Conti-Ramsden, 2003; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole & Baddley, 1990; Weismer et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMean length of utterance among Mandarin-speaking children with and without DLD
Wu, S.-Y. (2020) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659020945366 · Cited by 22
“…that using language sample analysis (LSA), a procedure of collecting language performance for evaluating expressive language ability in natural language contexts, could be an alternative approach to differentiating children with DLD (Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998; Plante and Vance, 1994).”
BackgroundOh, D. Y., & Yim, D. (2013) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · doi:10.12963/csd.13053 · Cited by 22
Spanish and English Language Performance in Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants
Yim, D. (2011) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e31823c9375 · Cited by 22
Moyle, M. J., Heilmann, J. J., & Finneran, D. A. (2014) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2014.882990 · Cited by 22
“…of 23 studies meeting quality guidelines, Graf Estes and colleagues (Graf Estes, Evans, & Else-Quest, 2007) found that children with specific LI performed an average of 1.27 SD below the mean score of TD children on NWR tasks (see also Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Ellis Weismer et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSrivastava, P., & Gray, S. I. (2012) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/10-0108 · Cited by 25
Balladares, J., Marshall, C. R., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2016) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723715626067 · Cited by 22
“…it has been suggested that because non-word repetition draws less on existing language knowledge and previous language experience, it should be less affected by SES compared to sentence repetition (Campbell, Dollaghan, Needleman, & Janosky, 1997; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Roy & Chiat, 2004).”
BackgroundIntensive Treatment for Persisting Rhotic Distortions: A Case Series.
Preston, J., & Leece, M. C. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0232 · Cited by 14
Dispaldro, M., Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. (2013) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12032 · Cited by 22
“The production of a word was considered correct if children produced the phonemes in the same order as the target with no omissions or substitutions (additions and distortions were allowed) (Dollaghan and Campbell 1998).”
BackgroundHow well do poor language scores at ages 3 and 4 predict poor language scores at age 6?
Dollaghan, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (2009) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549500903030824 · Cited by 22
“…from all complete and intelligible utterances in a 15-min play-based conversation with a familiar caregiver. cTotal percentage of phonemes correct, nonword repetition task (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998). dAll mean scores within row differed significantly (paired t-test with one-sided p5 .0001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCan executive functioning contribute to the diagnosis of SLI in bilingual children?
Laloi, A., de Jong, J., & Baker, A. E. (2017) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.15020.lal · Cited by 22
Vuolo, J., & Goffman, L. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00166 · Cited by 21
“The 16 nonwords from Dollaghan and Campbell (1998) were recorded by a native English-speaking female talker in a soundproof booth.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCalder, S. D., Claessen, M., Leitão, S., & Ebbels, S. H. (2021) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2021.1931454 · Cited by 24
“The Nonword Repetition Task (NRT) (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) requires participants to repeat 16 nonwords with four items of each syllable length, ranging from one to four syllables.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDispaldro, M., Benelli, B., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2009) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/13682820802491794 · Cited by 21
Manipulating articulatory demands in non-word repetition: A ‘late-8’ non-word repetition task
Moore, M. W., Tompkins, C. A., & Dollaghan, C. A. (2010) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2010.510917 · Cited by 21
“…(2006) compared the performance of a group of children with specific language impairment (SLI) and their age- and receptive vocabularymatched peers on two NRTs the Children’s Test of Non-word Repetition (CNRep; Gathercole, Willis, Baddeley, & Emslie, 1994) and the NRT (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationClark, N. B., McRoberts, G. W., Dyke, J. A. V., Shankweiler, D., & Braze, D. (2012) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2012.673045 · Cited by 21
“Third, recall of test items is also known to be influenced by thewordlikeness of the items (e.g. Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Graf-Estes et al., 2007; Treiman, Goswami, & Bruck, 1990).”
BackgroundInfluentialWillis, S., Goldbart, J., & Stansfield, J. (2014) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.025 · Cited by 21
“The most frequently utilized non-word repetition tests are the Children’s Test of Non-word Repetition (CNRep) [24], Non-word Repetition Test (NRT) [25] and subtests from a Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment (NEPSY) [26].”
MethodLanguage Exposure in Bilingual Toddlers: Performance on Nonword Repetition and Lexical Tasks
Brandeker, M., & Thordardottir, E. T. (2015) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-13-0106 · Cited by 21
“…several studies 128 American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology • Vol. 24 • 126–138 • May 2015 have found that nonwords with more syllables are more difficult to repeat (Archibald & Gathercole, 2006; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole et al., 1994; Elin Thordardottir & Brandeker, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPatterns of consonant deletion in typically developing children aged 3 to 7 years
James, D. G. H., van Doorn, J., McLeod, S. L., & Esterman, A. (2008) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549500701849789 · Cited by 21
Nonword repetition performance and related factors in children representing four linguistic groups
Lee, S. A. S., & Gorman, B. K. (2012) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006912438303 · Cited by 21
“Nonword repetition (NWR) appears to be the PSTM task of choice in language assessment research (e.g. Bishop, North, & Donlan, 1996; Botting & Conti-Ramsden, 2001; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Ellis Weismer et al., 2000).”
BackgroundThe Role of Lexical Stress on the Use of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female Speakers
Gibson, T. A. (2016) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.005 · Cited by 21
Syntactic priming as a window to investigate grammatical learning in non-typical populations
Garraffa, M., & Smith, G. (2022) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.31.09gar · Cited by 20
The Effectiveness of Constant, Variable, Random, and Blocked Practice in Speech-Motor Learning
Kaipa, R., Robb, M. P., & Jones, R. D. (2016) · Journal of Motor Learning and Development · doi:10.1123/jmld.2015-0044 · Cited by 20
“This measure has been shown to be effective as an outcome measure in studies related to nonword repetition (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
BackgroundProduction of Morphosyntax Within and Across Different Dialects of American English
Hendricks, A. E., & Adlof, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00244 · Cited by 20
Word Learning by Preschoolers With SLI: Effect of Phonotactic Probability and Object Familiarity
Gray, S. I., Brinkley, S., & Svetina, D. (2012) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0095 · Cited by 20
Bates, T. C., Michelle Luciano, A., Lind, P. A., Wright, M. J., Montgomery, G. W., & Martin, N. G. (2008) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.04.001 · Cited by 20
“The specific language impairment endophenotype of phonological storage efficiency was assessed using a standardised battery combining scores on the Gathercole, Willis, Baddeley and Emslie (1994) and Dollaghan and Campbell (1998) measures of nonword-repetition (NWrep).”
MethodAtypical neural responses to phonological detail in children with developmental language impairments
Archibald, L. M. D., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.003 · Cited by 20
The Dimensionality of Spanish in Young Spanish–English Dual-Language Learners
Language and Reading Research Consortium (LARRC) (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-13-0266 · Cited by 21
Navarrete, J., Adrián, J. A., Sánchez, M. G., & Rodríguez-Parra, M. J. (2004) · Revista de Logopedia Foniatría y Audiología · doi:10.1016/s0214-4603(04)75797-6 · Cited by 20
Crespo-Eguílaz, N., & García, J. N. (2003) · Revista de Neurología · doi:10.33588/rn.36s1.2003067 · Cited by 20
Brain and Language Associations in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review
Cermak, C. A., Arshinoff, S., de Oliveira, L. R., Tendera, A., Beal, D. S., Brian, J. A., Anagnostou, E. A., & Sanjeevan, T. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-04975-0 · Cited by 19
Nonword Repetition Problems in Children With Specific Language Impairment
Leclercq, A., Maillart, C., & Majerus, S. (2013) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e31829dd8c9 · Cited by 19
“DOI: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e31829dd8c9 ing children with Specific Language Impairment (Bishop, North, & Donlan, 1996; Conti-Ramsden, Botting, & Faragher, 2001; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole, 2006; Weismer et al., 2000).”
InfluentialClinician–Child Interactions: Adjustments in Linguistic Complexity
DeThorne, L. S., & Channell, R. W. (2007) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/016 · Cited by 19
Repetition of words and non-words in typically developing children: The role of prosody
Sundström, S., Samuelsson, C., & Lyxell, B. (2014) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723714550213 · Cited by 19
“Children’s ability to repeat non-words predicts language development (Adams & Gathercole, 2000; Gray, 2003; Sahlén, Reuterskiöld-Wagner, Nettelbladt, & Radeborg, 1999), and has potential as a clinical marker of language impairment (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
BackgroundPhonological and Visuospatial Short-Term Memory in Children With Specific Language Impairment
Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., & Nash, G. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology · doi:10.1891/1945-8959.11.1.45 · Cited by 19
“…put forward the view that nonword repetition measures can be viewed as “phenotypic markers” for SLI (Bishop et al., 1996) or culturally nonbiased screening instruments for helping detect SLI in populations of young children (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Montgomery, 2002; Ellis Weismer et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodMcDonald, J. L., & Oetting, J. B. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-l-18-0253 · Cited by 19
“The 16 nonwords were taken from Dollaghan and Campbell (1998). The nonwords ranged in length from one to four syllables, with four nonwords per length.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialErskine, M. E., Munson, B., & Edwards, J. (2020) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000547 · Cited by 19
“This is useful information because a nonword repetition task can be successfully administered to children as young as age 2 (Anderson, Wagovich, & Hall, 2006; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole & Adams, 1993; Shriberg et al., 2009).”
Cognitive and Linguistic Issues in the Study of Children with Specific Language Impairment
Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012369374-7/50031-6 · Cited by 19
Use of Speaker Intent and Grammatical Cues in Fast-Mapping by Adolescents With Down Syndrome
McDuffie, A. S., Sindberg, H. A., Hesketh, L. J., & Chapman, R. S. (2007) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/105 · Cited by 18
Understanding Word Reading Difficulties in Children With SLI
Adlof, S. M. (2017) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/persp2.sig1.71 · Cited by 18
“…(TD) children, it appeared that both children with SLI and children with dyslexia displayed significant difficulties with phonological processing tasks, including measures of phonological awareness and nonword repetition (e.g., Brady, Shankweiler, & Mann, 1983; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
BackgroundSchaeffer, J. C., van Witteloostuijn, M., & Creemers, A. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000492 · Cited by 18
Torres, F., Fuentes–López, E., Adrian Fuente, C., & Sevilla, F. (2020) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106054 · Cited by 18
Schneider, J. M., Abel, A. D., & Maguire, M. J. (2022) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2022.2081573 · Cited by 18
“Phonological memory was measured using a Nonword Repetition task (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
Exploring Expressive Vocabulary Variability in Two-Year-Olds: The Role of Working Memory
Newbury, J., Klee, T. M., Stokes, S. F., & Moran, C. N. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-15-0018 · Cited by 19
Gray, S. I., Reiser, M., & Brinkley, S. (2011) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0203 · Cited by 18
Dale, P. S., Rice, M. L., Rimfeld, K., & Hayiou‐Thomas, M. E. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-16-0364 · Cited by 18
Assessment of language acquisition
de Villiers, P. A., & de Villiers, J. G. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.30 · Cited by 18
Brooks, P. J., Seiger‐Gardner, L., & Sailor, K. M. (2012) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716412000495 · Cited by 18
“Children with SLI show significant deficits in nonword repetition, especially for nonwords over three syllables in length (Botting & ContiRamsden, 2001; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Ellis Weismer et al., 2000; Munson, Edwards, & Beckman, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Role of Slow Speech Amplitude Envelope for Speech Processing and Reading Development
Ríos‐López, P., Molnar, M. T., Lizarazu, M., & Lallier, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01497 · Cited by 18
“Although non-word repetition is a classical and extensively used task to measure phonological short term memory in children (e.g., Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998), it is a complex task involving auditory, phonological and speech-motor output processes (Gathercole, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodBell, N., Angwin, A. J., Wilson, W. J., & Arnott, W. L. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-17-0469 · Cited by 21
The role of phonological storage deficits in specific language impairment: A reconsideration
Weismer, S. E., & Edwards, J. (2006) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716406240396 · Cited by 18
Serial-position effects on a free-recall task in bilinguals
Yoo, J., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2015) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1013557 · Cited by 19
“A similar approach to coding non-word repetition data was used by other studies (e.g., Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Moore, Tompkins, & Dollaghan, 2010).”
MethodBilingual children with primary language impairment: 3 months after treatment
Pham, G. T., Ebert, K. D., & Kohnert, K. J. (2014) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12123 · Cited by 17
“Dependent measures for non-word repetition tasks were percent phonemes correct (PCC; Dollaghan and Campbell 1998) for the most dif-ficult level in each language (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGordon, K. R., & McGregor, K. K. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00164 · Cited by 17
“Before training, the children completed a non-word repetition test [NWR (Dollaghan and Campbell, 1998)] to test their phonological working memory.”
MethodMcDonald, J. L., Seidel, C. M., Hammarlund, R., & Oetting, J. B. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000509 · Cited by 17
The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs
Pérez‐Leroux, A. T., Peterson, T., Castilla-Earls, A. P., Béjar, S., Massam, D., & Roberge, Y. (2018) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2018.0019 · Cited by 17
“In addition to the referential tasks, children received three standardized tests: CELF-P2, KABC-II, Peabody Picture Vocabulary 4 (Dunn & Dunn 2007), and a standard nonword-repetition task (Dollaghan & Campbell 1998).”
MethodVender, M., Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000828 · Cited by 24
Roepke, E., Bower, K. E., Miller, C., & Brosseau‐Lapré, F. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00027 · Cited by 17
“While vowel errors are not typically scored on the SRT, other nonword repetition tasks do include vowel accuracy in the scoring (e.g., the nonword repetition task [NRT] by Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
BackgroundMueller, K. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2012) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e318261ffdd · Cited by 17
“To avoid such a confound, researchers in the field of language development have typically employed nonword repetition tasks (NWR), as opposed to digit span tasks, in the study of WM (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole, 2006; Gupta & Tisdale, 2009).”
Associations Between Key Language-Related Measures in Typically Developing School-Age Children
Archibald, L. M. D., Joanisse, M., & Shepherd, M. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.161 · Cited by 33
“Children with specific language impairment – an unexpected failure to develop language skills at a typical rate – tend to perform poorly on all of these tasks (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Rice & Wexler, 1996; Tallal & Stark, 1981).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Finite Verb Morphology Composite: Values From a Community Sample.
Rudolph, J., Dollaghan, C., & Crotteau, S. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-18-0437 · Cited by 10
“We defined this variable as the total percentage of phonemes repeated correctly (TOTPPC) on a 16-item nonword repetition task (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998).”
MethodSelf-citationMiller, C., Uhring, E. A., Brown, J. J. C., Kowalski, E. M., Roberts, B., & Schaefer, B. A. (2005) · Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders · doi:10.1044/cicsd_32_f_93 · Cited by 17
“The nonword repetition stimuli created by Dollaghan and Campbell (1998) have not been normed; however, Ellis Weismer et al. (2000) collected data using those stimuli from 359 typically developing children with a mean age of 7;11 (SD = 4.8 months).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGordon, K. R., Lowry, S. L., Ohlmann, N. B., & Fitzpatrick, D. F. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00530 · Cited by 17
“Third Edition (SPELT-3; Dawson et al., 2003) to capture expressive morphology and syntax skills; and a nonword repetition test (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) to capture verbal working memory abilities.”
Horne, A. O. V., Curran, M. K., Cook, S. W., Cole, R. S., & McGregor, K. K. (2023) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12882 · Cited by 19
Representação fonológica em crianças com Distúrbio Específico de Linguagem (DEL)
Befi‐Lopes, D. M., Pereira, A. C. S., & Bento, A. C. P. (2010) · Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica · doi:10.1590/s0104-56872010000300025 · Cited by 16
Consonant Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Nonword Repetition Are Not Articulatory in Nature
Moore, M. W., Fiez, J. A., & Tompkins, C. A. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-16-0359 · Cited by 16
“Scoring of the NWR task was completed according to the procedures described by Dollaghan and Campbell (1998).”
MethodIntroducing WCM-SE: The word complexity measure phonetically justified and adapted to Swedish
Marklund, U., Marklund, E., Schwarz, I., & Lacerda, F. P. (2018) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1493620 · Cited by 17
“Comparisons could be made to other measures, such as the Percentage Consonants Correct (Shriberg, Austin, Lewis, McSweeny, & Wilson, 1997; Shriberg & Kwiatkowski, 1982), the Percentage Phonemes Correct (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) or the Phonological Mean Length of Utterance (Ingram, 2002).”
BackgroundPhonological Priming With Nonwords in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment
Brooks, P. J., Seiger‐Gardner, L., Obeid, R., & MacWhinney, B. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0212 · Cited by 16
Working Memory and Interference Control in Children with Specific Language Impairment
Marton, K., Eichorn, N., Campanelli, L., & Zakariás, L. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12189 · Cited by 19
“…have consistently found that children with SLI perform more poorly than TD children on non-word repetition (e.g., Bishop, North, and Donlan 1996; Dollaghan and Campbell 1998; Graf Estes, Evans, and Else-Quest 2007), and poor non-word repetition, as a result, has become a behavioral marker for…”
BackgroundThe Impact of Feedback Frequency on Performance in a Novel Speech Motor Learning Task
Lowe, M. S., & Buchwald, A. B. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0207 · Cited by 16
“The participants’ articulation and phonological skills, phonological working memory, and perception of nonword sequences were also assessed using alternate motion rates and the Nonword Repetition Test (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Lisman & Sadagopan, 2013), because underlying speech motor planning and execution abiliti…”
MethodInfluentialAhufinger, N., Berglund-Barraza, A., Cruz‐Santos, A., Ferinu, L., Andreu, L., Sanz‐Torrent, M., & Evans, J. L. (2021) · Children · doi:10.3390/children8020085 · Cited by 16
“[46] reported data from the Dollaghan and Campbell [49] NRT, which is a version of NRT that consists of a set of 16 nonwords, four at each of four-syllable lengths (1-, 2-, 3-, 4-) that were controlled to all have low wordlikeness ratings.”
MethodDawson, G., & Toth, K. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939406.ch8 · Cited by 17
Christopulos, T. T., & Redmond, S. M. (2023) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2023_lshss-22-00169 · Cited by 16
Yim, D., Kim, S.-Y., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · doi:10.12963/csd.15241 · Cited by 15
“언어장애 아동들이 보이는 표면적인 언어문제 혹은 언어발달의 기저 요인을 밝히고자 하는 많은 연구들이 작업기억(working memory)에 주목하였는데 (Baddeley, 1992; Cleary, Pisoni, & Kirk, 2000; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990; Just & Carpenter, 1992; Montgomery, 2000), ‘처리 용량’은 작업기억 과제들을 수행할 때 중요한 제약 요인으로 작용한다.”
Sundström, S., Löfkvist, U., Lyxell, B., & Samuelsson, C. (2018) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659018805202 · Cited by 15
Guasti, M. T., White, M. J., Bianco, G., Arosio, F., Camilleri, B., & Hasson, N. (2020) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2020.1830303 · Cited by 15
“…repetition (NWR) tasks (Graf Estes et al., 2007; Italian: Bortolini et al., 2006; Dispaldro et al., 2013; Dutch: De Bree et al., 2007; English: Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; French: Thordardottir & Brandeker, 2013; Spanish: Girbau & Schwartz, 2008; Swedish: Sahlén et al., 1999; Icelandic:…”
Fortunato-Tavares, T. M., de Andrade, C. R. F., Befi‐Lopes, D. M., Hestvik, A., Epstein, B., Tornyova, L., & Schwartz, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0215 · Cited by 15
Steele, S. C., Willoughby, L. M., & Mills, M. T. (2012) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.3109/17549507.2012.700322 · Cited by 15
“…have consistently shown that pre-school and school-age children with LI perform more poorly on these tasks, compared to their same-age peers (Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Ellis Weismer, Tomblin, Zhang, Buckwalter, Chynoweth, & Jones, 2000; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990; Graf Estes, Evans, &…”
BackgroundDiagnostik und Differenzierung sprachentwicklungsgest�rter Kinder?
Keilmann, A., Braun, L., & Sch�ler, H. (2004) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-004-1115-z · Cited by 15
Coady, J. A., Evans, J. L., & Kluender, K. R. (2010) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/07-0264 · Cited by 15
EFFECT OF AN AUDITORY TRAINING PROGRAM ON READING, PHONEME AWARENESS, AND LANGUAGE
Valentine, D., Hedrick, M. S., & Swanson, L. A. (2006) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.103.1.183-196 · Cited by 15
“The two trained groups were statistically different on reading, phoneme awareness, and language abilities, but not different in backward masking thresholds. Even though these thresholds improved significantly after training, the changes were not correlated with improved reading. Although phoneme awareness improved, re…”
BackgroundDynamic Assessment With Bilinguals: A Focus on Increasing Clinicians' Confidence
Gorman, B. K. (2015) · Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations · doi:10.1044/cds22.3.112 · Cited by 15
The Fast-Mapping Abilities of Adults With Developmental Language Disorder
McGregor, K. K., Eden, N. M., Arbisi‐Kelm, T., & Oleson, J. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00418 · Cited by 16
Benham, S., & Goffman, L. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00244 · Cited by 14
“However, phonological aspects of novel word form learning are also clearly implicated (e.g., Coady & Evans, 2008; Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998; Graf Estes et al., 2007), which we contend form an important component of the deficit profile in DLD.”
BackgroundDevelopmental Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Silleresi, S. (2023) · Language acquisition & language disorders · doi:10.1075/lald.68 · Cited by 15
Schneider, J. M., Poudel, S., Abel, A. D., & Maguire, M. J. (2023) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101251 · Cited by 14
Goffman, L., & Gerken, L. (2023) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2023.2275837 · Cited by 14
“…with DLD show other de fi cits, such as in motor skills (e.g., Bishop & Edmundson, 1987; Brumbach & Go ff man, 2014; Hill, 2001; Sack et al., 2022; Vuolo et al., 2017), nonword repetition (e.g., Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998), and word form learning (e.g., Benham et al., 2018; McGregor et al., 2020).”
BackgroundAssessing Phonological Processing in Children With Speech Sound Disorders
Roepke, E. (2023) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2023_persp-23-00036 · Cited by 15
“Another possible source of difficulty on an NRT is motor planning and programming, referred to here as transcoding .”
InfluentialBecker, T. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2016) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.09.001 · Cited by 14
“…16 Sentence Repetition CELF-3 Recalling Sentences M 89% 78% 1.2 SD 7% 11% Min 67% 45% Max 100% 96% Phonological Memory Nonword Repetition Probe from Dollaghan & Campbell (1998) M 94% 91% .85 SD 3% 4% Min 86% 79% Max 99% 99% Attention CAARS-ADHD symptoms M 51 60 −.43 SD 10 28 Min 35 33 Max 72…”
MethodInfluentialKazemi, Y., & Saeednia, S. (2016) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.11.028 · Cited by 14
Kaganovich, N. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-16-0327 · Cited by 15
Associations Between Manual Dexterity and Language Ability in School-Age Children
Obeid, R., & Brooks, P. J. (2018) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-17-0124 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Campbell, Thomas F.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1136-1146
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1986346898
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r29dc001858-05)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R29DC01858)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- non-word repetition, language impairment, children, language screening, likelihood ratios, language intervention, diagnostic test validity, language assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Male, Phonetics, Speech Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review