Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Ability in Androgen-Deficient Men

Hier, Daniel B., Crowley, William F.·1982·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Several lines of previous evidence have suggested that androgens affect cognitive abilities. In an effort to characterize this defect, we compared 19 men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with 19 control men and with five men with acquired hypergonadotropic hypogonadism that had developed after puberty. The 19 patients with idiopathic hypogonadism had markedly impaired spatial ability in comparison to either controls or subjects with acquired hypogonadism (P less than 0.05). Moreover, the spatial ability of the patients correlated positively with their testicular volume (P less than 0.05). Androgen-replacement therapy in six of the patients did not improve their spatial ability. The impairment in spatial ability in men with the idiopathic form of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, the lack of such an impairment in men with the acquired form, and the failure to exogenous androgens to correct the deficits in the idiopathic form suggest that androgens exert a permanent organizing influence on the brain before or at puberty in boys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198205203062003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hier, D. B., & Crowley, W. F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1982-05-20
Volume
306
Issue
20
Pages
1202-1205
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338772993
Cited by
354
References
2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.