The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 15 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; CREDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02065791.).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
10 of 15 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Abstract
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
The Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes section describes the renal analysis as hypothesis-generating and reports fewer renal composite events with dapagliflozin than with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Discussion also describes a pattern of improved renal outcomes across SGLT2-inhibitor cardiovascular trials. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites [8] 8. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 691-704. source
The 'Evidence before this study' section (p. 4) reports exploratory renal findings from the cardiovascular EMPA-REG OUTCOME and CANVAS trials in people with type 2 diabetes. The Introduction (p. 8) draws the same cautious conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors might have renoprotective effects. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites [9] 9. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 323-34. source
The paper describes EMPA-REG OUTCOME as a trial primarily assessing cardiovascular outcomes and identifies kidney-disease progression as a prespecified secondary objective (p. 324). Its Renal Outcomes section reports significantly less incident or worsening nephropathy with empagliflozin than with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. That supports the citing sentence’s cautious claim, though this paper tests empagliflozin specifically. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The only currently approved treatment for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetes is reninangiotensin system blockade, which was first shown to be effective 18 years ago.3,4”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > RESULTS
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [3] 3. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and car- diovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861-9. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (p. 4) reports that losartan, a renin–angiotensin system blocker, provides renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only approved renoprotective treatment, or extend its finding to all patients with type 2 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [4] 4. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angio- tensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851-60. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions (page not provided) report that irbesartan, an angiotensin-II-receptor blocker, protects against progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. The Discussion cautions against assuming equivalent effects for ACE inhibitors and receptor blockers in these patients. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only currently approved renoprotective treatment. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects were consistent across regions and other prespecified subgroups (Fig. 2, and Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Appendix)”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estimated GFR <15 ml/min/1.73m 2 78/2202 125/2199 13.6 22.2 0.60 (0.45-0.80)NA”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“End-stage kidney disease, renal death, or cardiovascular death † 214/2202 287/2199 37.6 51.2 0.73 (0.61-0.87)NA”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the relative risk of endstage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002).”
- Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
“for the components of end-stage kidney disease (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002)”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this trial, we found that patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease who received canagliflozin had a lower risk of the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo.”
- Also stated in: § Geometric · plain
“In conclusion, among patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, those in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events than those in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Geometric · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05)”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial also showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo, 6”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. source
The Cardiovascular Outcomes section (p. 4) reports that empagliflozin was superior to placebo for the trial’s primary cardiovascular outcome (P = 0.04 for superiority). The claim is supported in that trial-outcome sense; the section does not report superiority for the key secondary outcome. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The similar rates of amputation and fracture that we observed with canagliflozin and placebo are reassuring and consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors 6,7,20 but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.5”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Geometric
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Safety and Adverse Events section (p. 7) reports similar bone-fracture rates with empagliflozin and placebo, supporting the fracture comparison. Our copy does not report amputation rates, so it does not establish the amputation comparison. The CANVAS comparison is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
The Additional Safety Assessments section reports balanced rates of amputation and fracture with dapagliflozin and placebo; Table 2 gives the corresponding rates. This supports the comparison to another SGLT2-inhibitor trial. The CANVAS Program contrast is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [20] 20. Inzucchi SE, Iliev H, Pfarr E, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and assessment of lower- limb amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41(1): e4-e5. source
- Supportedcites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
The CANVAS Program paper reports a greater risk of amputation with canagliflozin than with placebo (Conclusions) and a higher rate of all fractures in the integrated trials (fracture results; page unavailable). That supports the portion attached to citation 5: similar rates in the citing study differ from CANVAS Program findings. The comparison with other SGLT2-inhibitor trials is attached to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The significantly lower rates of cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, in the canagliflozin group in our trial are consistent with those observed with canagliflozin in the CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program, 5 despite the smaller differences in glycemic control.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observed benefits were obtained on a background of renin-angiotensin system blockade, the only approved renoprotective medications in type 2 diabetes, a factor that highlights the clinical significance of the findings.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis were low but higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (2.2 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-years)”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effects on Safety Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar overall in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group (Table 2, and Tables S4 and S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effects on Safety Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no significant difference in the risk of lowerlimb amputation, with rates of 12.3 versus 11.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.56).”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effects on Safety Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we found that patients who received canagliflozin (including those who had a reduced estimated GFR at baseline) had a lower risk of the primary outcome overall than those in the placebo group, as well as less end-stage kidney disease.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subgroup analyses were assessed by tests for the interaction between the trial group and the subgroup in stratified Cox proportionalhazards models without adjustment for multiple testing.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > 2298
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A single interim analysis was to be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after the primary outcome had occurred in 405 patients.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Statistical Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 405Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the intention-to-treat population, we used a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model to analyze the primary and secondary outcomes, according to the category of estimated GFR at screening.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Statistical Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the trial conclusion at a median follow-up of 2.62 years (range, 0.02 to 4.53), 1201 patients (27.3%) in the two groups had discontinued therapy (Table S3 and Figs.S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix); the rate of adherence to the trial regimen was 84% during follow-up.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Patients
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 1,201Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses were performed by the sponsor and independently con-firmed at George Clinical with the use of original data.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Trial Design and Oversight
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prespecified stopping guidance that was provided to the data monitoring committee by the steering committee proposed possible recommendation of early cessation if clear evidence of benefit was observed for the primary outcome (P<0.01) and the composite of end-stage kidney disease or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (P<0.025), with consideration of the overall balance of risks and benefits”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Statistical Analysis
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so the differences in all subsequent outcomes in the hierarchical testing sequence were not formally tested.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and 25 composite events of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (NNT, 40; 95% CI, 23 to 165).”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Figure 1 (facing page). Primary Composite, Renal, and Mortality Outcomes.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trial was designed to be event-driven, with the enrollment of at least 4200 patients (844 events) required to provide a power of 90% to detect a risk of the primary outcome that was 20% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at an alpha level of 0.045 after adjustment for one interim analysis.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Statistical Analysis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All renal and cardiovascular outcomes that were part of the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as key safety outcomes (fractures, pancreatitis, ketoacidosis, and renal-cell carcinoma), were adjudicated by independent adjudication committees whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the secondary outcomes would be tested at a two-sided level of 0.038, to account for type I error inflation in the group sequential design.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > 2298
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion (1:1) to receive either canagliflozin (100 mg orally once daily) or matching placebo with the use of randomly permuted blocks, with stratification according to the category of estimated GFR (30 to <45 ml, 45 to <60 ml, or 60 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ) at screening.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Trial Procedures
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 4361 patients (99.1%) were either alive with follow-up at the end of the trial or had died before the final follow-up visit.Consent was withdrawn by 16 patients (0.4%), and vital status was ascertained for all but 6 patients (4395 [99.9%]).”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Patients
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 4,361Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 4,401Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In contrast to completed cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, [5][6][7] our trial included a population at high risk for kidney failure and had a primary outcome of major renal end points.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [5][6][7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analyses for fracture, renal-cell carcinoma, acute pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis were based on confirmed and adjudicated results.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effect on Intermediate Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“First, the trial was stopped early at a planned interim analysis, which may have limited the power for some secondary outcomes and may increase the risk of overestimating effect sizes.21”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Geometric
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] 21. Guyatt GH, Briel M, Glasziou P, Bassler D, Montori VM. Problems of stop- ping trials early. BMJ 2012; 344: e3863. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, we excluded patients who had very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR, <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ), nonalbuminuric or microalbuminuric disease, and kidney diseases believed to be due to conditions other than type 2 diabetes, so it is not known whether the findings can be generalized to such populations.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Geometric
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All potential ketone-related events were adjudicated for diabetic ketoacidosis by an independent adjudication committee on the basis of clinical presentation and predefined biochemical measures.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Effect on Intermediate Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This suggests that the mechanism of benefit is likely to be independent of glucose levels and may possibly stem from a reduction in intraglomerular pressure, [11][12][13] with other possible mechanisms presently being studied.[14][15][16][17]”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [11][12][13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we did not measure off-treatment estimated GFR levels among the patients who had completed the trial, so the differences in the estimated GFR values at the end of the trial are probably underestimations.”
§ Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy > Geometric
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“However, during the CREDENCE trial recruitment, an amendment was introduced, excluding those at risk for amputation.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, also reduce albuminuria in clinical trials of advanced diabetic kidney disease (471-473).”
From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [471]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“canagli fl ozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and MACE by 39% (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47 -0.80)”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SGLT2i conferred less annual eGFR decline and a reduction in albuminuria or decreased progression to severely increased albuminuria.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Of note, in the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials, kidney outcomes were the primary outcome evaluated.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even for the secondary outcome of dialysis, kidney transplant, or death from kidney causes, there was evidence for signi fi cant bene fi t (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54 -0.97).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus, the evidence is particularly strong for the population corresponding to the CREDENCE and DAPACKD studies (ACR > 200 -300 mg/g [ > 20 -30 mg/mmol] and eGFR > 25 -30 and < 75 -90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 .”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In CREDENCE, a drop in eGFR $ 30% was uncommon (4% of participants assigned to canagli fl ozin) but was associated with modestly increased risks of kidney adverse events.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Protocols of multiple RCTs, including CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD, speci fi ed continuation of study drug (active or placebo) even when observed eGFR dropped below the eligibility threshold speci fi ed for initiation.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, a sustained ≥57% decrease in eGFR (equivalent to doubling of serum creatinine) was selected in FIDELITY because it is a classic outcome in diabetic nephropathy studies2 , 12–14 and is a more robust kidney failure surrogate outcome than a ≥40% decrease in eGFR, particularly when initial changes in eGFR occur.14 , 15”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous studies assessing SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, such as CREDENCE or DAPA-CKD, included patient populations representing a substantially smaller part of the CKD spectrum than the FIDELITY analysis.”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“while the glucose-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are blunted with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73m 2 , the kidney and cardiovascular benefits were still seen at eGFR levels as low as 20 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 even with no significant change in glucose (4,29,31,107,123,127,129,130).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“First, the patient populations differed in the two trials”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the mechanisms of action differ between drug classes, including different effects on metabolic, hemodynamic, and diuretic factors and on inflammation and fibrosis.4,13,18,19”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failurerelated outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure-related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (250,(255)(256)(257)(298)(299)(300)(301)(302)(303)(304)(305)(306).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While there was an increased risk of lower-limb amputation with canagliflozin in one trial (247), no significant increase in lower-limb amputations, fractures, AKI, or hyperkalemia was seen in other trials of canagliflozin (248).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Results of large cardiovascular outcome trials of empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg daily) and canagliflozin (100 or 300 mg daily) showed that treatment with either drug reduced rates of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The SGLT2 inhibitors empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failure–related outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure–related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (242,247,248,281,286–294).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To date, two clinical trials with primary kidney disease outcomes using canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation [CREDENCE] and Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease [DAPA-CKD]) demonstrated significant benefit for composite outcomes including end points of substantial eGFR decl”
From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, their ability to lower glucose levels declines when the eGFR falls below 45 mL/min/1.73m 2 (142-144).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [142]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial showed that long-term administration of canagliflozin conferred renal and cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The kidney-protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors have previously been shown in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the CREDENCE trial.10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Clinical trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors have shown similar results.8,10,19”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As in other trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, there was an initial dip in the estimated GFR, followed by a stabilization of kidney-function decline.7,8,10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In patients with diabetic kidney disease with increased levels of albuminuria, large placebo-controlled trials have shown that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors,3–5 sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors,6,7 and the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone8,9 all reduced the risk of progression to kidney failure.”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The effect of SGLT2 inhibition on kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death seen in the present trial is quantitatively similar to that seen in two other large placebo-controlled trials in CKD populations.6,7”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CREDENCE trial of canagliflozin required all participants to have type 2 diabetes and a urinary ACR of at least 300 mg/g, and excluded patients with an eGFR of less than 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2.6”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of ESKD over control (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the development of the primary end point, which included dialysis for $30 days, kidney transplantation or eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m 2 sustained for $30 days by central laboratory assessment, doubling from the baseline serum creatinine average sustained for $30 days by central laboratory assessment, or renal death or cardiovascular death, was reduced by 30%.”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, in this advanced CKD group, there were clear benefits on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrating a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (29,110,113).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of the participants (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In 2019, the results of the CREDENCE trial 17 -the first study designed to specifically assess the effect of an SGLT2 inhibitor (canagliflozin) on a primary kidney outcome in people with established diabetic kidney disease-were reported.”
From SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and 20% (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67 -0.95), respectively.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“which was the fi rst RCT of an SGLT2i speci fi cally powered for primary kidney outcomes among patients with exclusively albuminuric CKD.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The increased risk of lower-limb amputations seen with canagli fl ozin in the CANVAS trial 87 was not reproduced in the CREDENCE trial, 93 even though this trial did implement special attention to foot care for prevention.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The primary outcome occurred in 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagli fl ozin and placebo arms respectively, which translated to a 30% relative reduction in the primary kidney outcome by canagli fl ozin (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59 -0.82).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“in the CREDENCE trial, which evaluated 100 mg/d of canagli fl ozin, there was no excess fracture rate.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment bene fi t of subgroups de fi ned by eGFR or ACR ( P -interactions were nonsigni fi cant).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the CREDENCE trial, this was 2.2 versus 0.2 per 1000 patient-years for canagli fl ozin versus placebo.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Participants with T2D and an eGFR as low as 30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were included in the EMPA-REG, CANVAS, and CREDENCE trials, 87,90,93 and ef fi cacy and safety in these studies were consistent across both eGFR and albuminuria down to this threshold.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes have high residual cardiorenal morbidity and mortality, despite current therapies,1–5”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“there were clear benefits on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrating a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (29,125,126).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the development of the primary end point, which included dialysis for ≥30 days, kidney transplantation or eGFR <15 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 sustained for ≥30 days by central laboratory assessment, doubling from the baseline serum creatinine average sustained for ≥30 days by central laboratory assessment, or kidney death or cardiovascular death, was reduced by 30%.”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of kidney failure over placebo (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of the participants (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The magnitude of the between-group difference in the risk of a primary outcome event was smaller than that shown for the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin in the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial.4”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the CREDENCE trial excluded patients treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a population with CKD and albuminuria (UACR >300-5,000 mg/g) (257).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a population with CKD and albuminuria (UACR >300-5,000 mg/g) (257).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“There was concern that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may promote AKI through volume depletion, particularly when combined with diuretics or other medications that reduce glomerular filtration; however, this has not been found to be true in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease (29) or high CVD risk with normal kidney function (30)(31)(32).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the CREDENCE trial, which was conducted in a population of patients with exclusively T2D and CKD, this occurred in 2.27% of those in the canagli fl ozin arm versus 0.59% of those receiving placebo.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the ERT identi fi ed 25 relevant RCTs in an updated Cochrane systematic review.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“There was concern that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may promote AKI through volume depletion, particularly when combined with diuretics or other medications that reduce glomerular filtration; however, this has not been found to be true in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease (29) or high CVD risk with normal kidney function (30)(31)(32).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the three kidney outcomes trials examining SGLT2i, the use of GLP-1 RAs was rare, below 5%12–14.”
From Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Little is known about the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the broad spectrum of both inpatient and outpatient worsening heart failure events, because these were not documented in trials with these drugs in type 2 diabetes.1–5”
From Effect of Empagliflozin on the Clinical Stability of Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Reduced Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalizations for heart failure in 8 large-scale trials, including those that focused on type 2 diabetes, heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease.1–8”
From Effect of Empagliflozin on the Clinical Stability of Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Reduced Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Despite the fact that clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these lifestyle and pharmacological interventions (3–10), residual cardiovascular (CV) and kidney risk remains present even with guideline-recommended treatment (8,10).”
In the citing paper
“Even with current therapies available [6–10], patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) still experience a significant cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality.”
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, SGLT2i have been studied specifically among patients with CKD with or without T2D in 3 completed primary kidney outcome trials (CREDENCE[15], DAPA-CKD[16], and EMPA-KIDNEY[17]), which showed benefit for both a significant reduction in the primary kidney outcomes and cardiovascular outcomes [18,19].”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease: a review of their kidney and heart protection (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“This is in contrast to SGLT2i where there have been 3 dedicated kidney outcome trials that specifically enrolled a CKD population.”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease: a review of their kidney and heart protection (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In these patients at high risk of HF, a consistent risk reduction of CV death or HF hospitalization was observed ranging from 23% to 31%.150,153,542,543”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with placebo, were associated with more new-onset AF cases in EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin vs. placebo), but fewer incident AF cases in CANVAS (canagliflozin vs. placebo) and DECLARE-TIMI 58 (dapagliflozin vs. placebo).71,151,153,603”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“Combining RAS and SGLT2 inhibitors does not appear to cause hyperkalaemia, and a hypothesis has been raised that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of severe hyperkalaemia among MRA users with HF. 153,542,710,723,724,727,728”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, combining an SGLT2 inhibitor with an ACE-I or ARB has clear beneficial effects on risk of kidney failure and hospitalization for HF in patients with CKD and T2DM.153,542”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“Information on the safety and efficacy of combining MRAs with SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD is limited as only ∼4% of FIDELIO-DKD, ∼8% of FIGARO-DKD, ∼5% of DAPA-CKD, and no CREDENCE participants were prescribed such a combination.153,718,719,721”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“The CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD, and EMPA-KIDNEY placebo-controlled trials were all stopped early for efficacy while testing canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin, respectively.153,543,711”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“Combining RAS and SGLT2 inhibitors does not appear to cause hyperkalaemia, and a hypothesis has been raised that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of severe hyperkalaemia among MRA users with HF. 153,542,710,723,724,727,728”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“All three trials found the RR reductions for kidney disease progression were unmodified by baseline eGFR, with EMPA-KIDNEY reporting clear benefits in patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m 2 .153,542,543,712,713”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
In the citing paper
“Large trials have also shown that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuric chronic kidney disease,1, 6, 7, 8”
In the citing paper
“CREDENCE and SCORED exclusively studied patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes,7, 9”
In the citing paper
“Individual trials have shown that kidney benefits translate into important reductions in the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation”
In the citing paper
“A total of 489 kidney disease progression outcomes accrued in those with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2 in those two trials.”
In the citing paper
“efficacy and safety data from EMPA-KIDNEY and DAPA-CKD combined include information on nearly 3000 patients with an eGFR of 20–30 mL/min per 1·73 m2.”
In the citing paper
“Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, relatively modest reductions in BP with SGLT2 inhibition are unlikely to fully explain the substantial risk reductions in kidney failure and cardiovascular outcomes with these agents, 9,[35][36][37] a conclusion supported by the finding that less than 10% of treatment effects on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes were explained by change in systolic BP.”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Analyses of change in systolic BP were based on-treatment analyses using complete data, as pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan and to be consistent with the primary trial report.9”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“In the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) Trial, canagliflozin reduced the risk of kidney failure and of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with T2DM and CKD by 30 and 40% respectively.9”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“The kidney benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be largely independent of glycemic control based on a growing series of observations.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“These collective findings were subsequently proven by the CREDENCE trial, the first to show superiority of an SGLT2 inhibitor added to the standard of care for CKD in T2DM for a primary outcome of kidney disease end points (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, kidney protection is consistent and substantial in this population (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Their glucose-lowering effects are modest, especially in people with baseline estimated GFR (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“In patients with CKD, the kidney and CVD benefits of canagliflozin were established by the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial in patients with T2DM, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Results from these CVOTs and CREDENCE revealed more robust and consistent benefits on HF than on MACE with SGLT2 inhibitors (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Diuresis is an important mechanism for reducing blood pressure and risk for HF events (11–16,35).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“The CVOTs designed to test safety and a CKD trial (CREDENCE) were comparable in key aspects: participants with T2DM, placebo controls, SGLT2 inhibitor dose not based on glycemia, all participants treated by standard of care, and similarly defined and adjudicated outcomes.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“CREDENCE was the first clinical trial to be stopped early for overwhelming efficacy proving the kidney protective effects of SGLT2 inhibition for DKD.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Starting at a mean baseline eGFR of 56 mL/min/1.73 m2, risk for the primary outcome (serum creatinine doubling, kidney failure treated by KRT, or death from kidney disease or CVD) was substantially reduced (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59–0.82).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“In the CVOTs and CREDENCE, kidney-protective effects are consistent overall (Fig. 6) (69) and in participants with different levels of glycemic control (HbA1c <7% or >9%) or eGFR strata (>90, 60–90, or 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (11,12,14,70).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“These kidney-protective effects were accomplished with nominal between-group differences in HbA1c levels or blood pressure.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“The number needed to treat with canagliflozin to prevent a primary outcome event was 22 during a mean of 2.6 years.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“In CREDENCE, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio was reduced by 31% (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“After 3 weeks of treatment, the mean rate of eGFR decline was significantly slower in patients receiving canagliflozin compared with placebo (−1.85 vs. −4.59 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year) (Figs. 4 and 5).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“The effects on kidney disease outcomes are also similar irrespective of background use of renin-angiotensin system blockade (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney disease end points do not differ in patients with established ASCVD or those with multiple CVD risk factors (12,14,70).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Higher risks for amputation and fracture were not observed in CVOTs of other SGLT2 inhibitors or with canagliflozin in the CREDENCE trial (14,69,95).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“In CREDENCE, 29.8% (1,313/4,401) of participants had a baseline eGFR of 30 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and kidney benefits did not differ from those in patients with higher eGFR (14,69).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“DECLARE enrolled more patients without preexisting cardiovascular disease (59%) than either CANVAS (34%) or EMPA-REG OUTCOME (0%), meaning that at least some of the benefits of SGLT2 inhibition extend to those without overt cardiovascular disease.”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
In the citing paper
“adverse effects that have not been reported to date with other SGLT2 inhibitors and were not observed in a subsequent trial of canagliflozin”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
In the citing paper
“Sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney failure in patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).”
From A kidney perspective on the mechanism of action of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as Perkovic et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“and of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.57 -0.83])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“as well as lower risk of hospitalizations for heart failure (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.47 -0.80])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“Canagli fl ozin was additionally found to have a lower risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.67 -0.95])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“The risk of the primary composite outcome was 30% lower with canagli fl ozin treatment when compared with placebo (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.59 -0.82]).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“In terms of safety, no signi fi cant increase in lower-limb amputations, fractures, acute kidney injury, or hyperkalemia was noted for canaglifl ozin relative to placebo in CREDENCE.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“An increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis was noted, however, with 2.2 and 0.2 events per 1,000 patient-years noted in the canagli fl ozin and placebo groups, respectively (HR 10.80 [95% CI 1.39 -83.65]) (194).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, it reduced the prespeci fi ed end point of end-stage kidney disease alone by 32% (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54 -0.86]).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“The trial was stopped early due to conclusive evidence of ef fi cacy identi fi ed during a prespeci fi ed interim analysis with no unexpected safety signals.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“Reduced incidence of heart failure has been observed with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (8,194,196).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“In summary, there are now numerous large randomized controlled trials reporting statistically signi fi cant reductions in cardiovascular events for three of the FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (empagli fl ozin, canagli fl ozin, dapagli fl ozin, with lesser bene fi ts seen with ertugli fl ozin)”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagli fl ozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, and 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a diabetic kidney disease population with albuminuria (UACR > 300 to 5,000 mg/g) (194).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In the citing paper
“In addition, they slow the rate of decline in kidney function in these patients and reduce renal morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney dysfunction.”
From Efficacy of Dapagliflozin on Renal Function and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of DAPA-HF (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Despite improvements in kidney outcomes with available pharmacotherapies, the risk of kidney failure in people with CKD and T2D remains high [14,15].”
In the citing paper
“Despite the availability of established and newer pharmacotherapies to delay CKD progression in people with T2D, the risk of progression and the associated morbidity and mortality remains substantial [14,15].”
In the citing paper
“However, increased amputation risk has not been seen with other SGLT2 inhibitors, nor with canagliflozin in the subsequent CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes and Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial, in which such adverse events were systematically collected.40”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,379
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., Mattheus, M., Devins, T., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504720 · Cited by 12,315
Self-citationCanagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Neal, B., Perkovic, V., Mahaffey, K. W., de Zeeuw, D., Fulcher, G., Erondu, N., Shaw, W., Law, G., Desai, M., & Matthews, D. R. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611925 · Cited by 7,830
Self-citationBrenner, B. M., Cooper, M. E., de Zeeuw, D., Keane, W. F., Mitch, W. E., Parving, H.-H., Remuzzi, G., Snapinn, S. M., Zhang, Z., & Shahinfar, S. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011161 · Cited by 7,493
Self-citationDapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Wiviott, S. D., Raz, I., Bonaca, M. P., Mosenzon, O., Kato, E. T., Cahn, A., Silverman, M. G., Zelniker, T. A., Kuder, J. F., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812389 · Cited by 6,382
Lewis, E. J., Hunsicker, L. G., Clarke, W. R., Berl, T., Pohl, M. A., Lewis, J. B., Ritz, E., Atkins, R. C., Rohde, R., & Raz, I. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011303 · Cited by 5,987
Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes
Wanner, C., Inzucchi, S. E., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., von Eynatten, M., Mattheus, M., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & Zinman, B. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1515920 · Cited by 3,655
Self-citationWorldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review
Liyanage, T., Ninomiya, T., Jha, V., Neal, B. C., Patrice, H. M., Okpechi, I. G., Zhao, M., Lv, J., Garg, A. X., Knight, J. F., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61601-9 · Cited by 2,344
Self-citationCherney, D. Z. I., Perkins, B. A., Soleymanlou, N., Maione, M., Lai, V., Lee, A., Fagan, N. M., Woerle, H. J., Johansen, O. E., Broedl, U. C., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.113.005081 · Cited by 1,329
Fitchett, D., Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Hantel, S., Salsali, A., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & Inzucchi, S. E. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728 · Cited by 907
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease
Stevens, P. E., Ahmed, S. B., Carrero, J. J., Foster, B., Francis, A., Hall, R. K., Herrington, W. G., Hill, G., Inker, L. A., Kazancıoğlu, R., et al. (2024) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 · Cited by 8,530
Self-citationDapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
McMurray, J. J. V., Solomon, S. D., Inzucchi, S. E., Køber, L., Kosiborod, M. N., Martinez, F. A., Ponikowski, P., Sabatine, M. S., Anand, I. S., Bělohlávek, J., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1911303 · Cited by 7,140
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Visseren, F. L. J., Mach, F., Smulders, Y. M., Carballo, D., Koskinas, K. C., Bäck, M., Benetos, A., Biffi, A., Boavida, J.-M., Capodanno, D., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 · Cited by 6,485
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Heerspink, H. J. L., Stefánsson, B. V., Correa-Rotter, R., Chertow, G. M., Greene, T., Hou, F.-F., Mann, J. F. E., McMurray, J. J. V., Lindberg, M., Rossing, P., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2024816 · Cited by 5,618
Self-citation2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
Byrne, R. A., Rossello, X., Coughlan, J. J., Barbato, E., Berry, C., Chieffo, A., Claeys, M. J., Dan, G.-A., Dweck, M. R., Galbraith, M., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191 · Cited by 5,333
Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0033 · Cited by 3,518
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Gerstein, H. C., Colhoun, H. M., Dagenais, G. R., Diaz, R., Lakshmanan, M., Pais, P., Probstfield, J., Riesmeyer, J. S., Riddle, M. C., Rydén, L., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31149-3 · Cited by 3,163
Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes
Bakris, G. L., Agarwal, R., Anker, S. D., Pitt, B., Ruilope, L. M., Rossing, P., Kolkhof, P., Nowack, C., Schloemer, P., Joseph, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2025845 · Cited by 2,935
Self-citationThe changing landscape of atherosclerosis
Libby, P. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03392-8 · Cited by 2,873
Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2204233 · Cited by 2,754
“6,7 The CREDENCE trial of canagliflozin required all participants to have type 2 diabetes and a urinary ACR of at least 300 mg/g, and excluded patients with an eGFR of less than 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 .”
InfluentialMcDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., Chioncel, O., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195 · Cited by 2,612
Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Collins, B. S., Gabbay, R. A., Green, J., Maruthur, N. M., Rosas, S. E., Del Prato, S., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0034 · Cited by 2,104
“Notably, the benefits of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i for cardiovascular and renal outcomes have been found to be independent of metformin use, and thus these agents should be considered in people with established or high risk of CVD, HF, or CKD, independent of metformin use (173–175).”
BackgroundInfluentialCardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease
Jankowski, J., Floege, J., Fliser, D., Böhm, M., & Marx, N. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.050686 · Cited by 2,062
Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure
Bhatt, D. L., Szarek, M., Steg, P. G., Cannon, C. P., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Lewis, J. B., Riddle, M. C., Voors, A. A., Metra, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2030183 · Cited by 1,868
Self-citationEffects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Perkovic, V., Tuttle, K. R., Rossing, P., Mahaffey, K. W., Mann, J. F. E., Bakris, G., Baeres, F. M. M., Idorn, T., Bosch-Traberg, H., Lausvig, N. L., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2403347 · Cited by 2,099
Self-citationChronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Management: A Review
Chen, T. K., Knicely, D. H., & Grams, M. E. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.14745 · Cited by 1,811
Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications
Cole, J. B., & Florez, J. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0278-5 · Cited by 1,797
Kristensen, S. L., Rørth, R., Jhund, P. S., Docherty, K. F., Sattar, N., Preiss, D., Køber, L., Petrie, M. C., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30249-9 · Cited by 1,663
2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.
Marx, N., Federici, M., Schütt, K., Müller-Wieland, D., Ajjan, R. A., Antunes, M. J., Christodorescu, R. M., Crawford, C., Di Angelantonio, E., Eliasson, B., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192 · Cited by 1,642
GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes - state-of-the-art
Nauck, M. A., Quast, D. R., Wefers, J., & Meier, J. J. (2021) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102 · Cited by 1,647
“For the time being, more robust effects have been reported for SGLT-2 inhibitors, which are preferred glucose-lowering medications interfering with the progression of diabetic renal disease even in patients with moderately reduced eGFR [110,111,167].”
BackgroundCardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes
Cannon, C. P., Pratley, R., Dagogo-Jack, S., Mancuso, J., Huyck, S., Masiukiewicz, U., Charbonnel, B., Frederich, R., Gallo, S., Cosentino, F., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2004967 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationDavies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5 · Cited by 1,455
Kalantar‐Zadeh, K., Jafar, T. H., Nitsch, D., Neuen, B. L., & Perkovic, V. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00519-5 · Cited by 1,660
Self-citationZannad, F., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S. J., Anker, S. D., Butler, J., Filippatos, G., Brueckmann, M., Ofstad, A. P., Pfarr, E., Jamal, W., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31824-9 · Cited by 1,408
KDIGO 2020 Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease
de Boer, I. H., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019 · Cited by 1,399
Self-citationKDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease
Rossing, P., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 · Cited by 1,373
Self-citationAgarwal, R., Filippatos, G., Pitt, B., Anker, S. D., Rossing, P., Joseph, A., Kolkhof, P., Nowack, C., Gebel, M., Ruilope, L. M., et al. (2022) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab777 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationMcGuire, D. K., Shih, W. J., Cosentino, F., Charbonnel, B., Cherney, D. Z. I., Dagogo-Jack, S., Pratley, R., Greenberg, M., Wang, S., Huyck, S., et al. (2021) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511 · Cited by 1,235
Self-citationSotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease
Bhatt, D. L., Szarek, M., Pitt, B., Cannon, C. P., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Lewis, J. B., Riddle, M. C., Inzucchi, S. E., Kosiborod, M. N., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2030186 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citationBuse, J. B., Wexler, D. J., Tsapas, A., Rossing, P., Mingrone, G., Mathieu, C., D’Alessio, D. A., & Davies, M. J. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0066 · Cited by 1,192
Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Collins, B. S., Gabbay, R. A., Green, J., Maruthur, N. M., Rosas, S. E., Del Prato, S., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2 · Cited by 1,048
“The Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial assessed sotagliflozin (a dual SGLT1i/SGLT2i, currently not approved for type 2 diabetes in the USA or the EU) in people with type 2 diabetes who h…”
InfluentialBaigent, C., Emberson, J., Haynes, R., Herrington, W. G., Judge, P., Landray, M. J., Mayne, K. J., Ng, S. Y. A., Preiss, D., Roddick, A. J., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02074-8 · Cited by 1,020
“…so individual trial investigators provided a re-analysis of eGFR data to derive this meta-analysis’ pre-selected composite kidney disease progression outcome as well as any other unavailable outcomes of interest (3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 21, 41) (excluding the short duration SOLOIST-WHF trial (18)).”
Self-citationTargeting the progression of chronic kidney disease
Ruiz-Ortega, M., Rayego-Mateos, S., Lamas, S., Ortiz, A., & Rodrigues-Diez, R. R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0248-y · Cited by 979
Metabolomics: A New Tool to Reveal the Nature of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Huang, G., Li, M., Li, Y. J., & Mao, Y. (2022) · Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1093/labmed/lmac041 · Cited by 933
de Boer, I. H., Khunti, K., Sadusky, T., Tuttle, K. R., Neumiller, J. J., Rhee, C. M., Rosas, S. E., Rossing, P., & Bakris, G. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0027 · Cited by 919
“982 and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation [CREDENCE] and Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease [DAPA-CKD]) demonstrated significant benefit for composite outcomes including end points of substantial eGFR decline, kidney failure, and mortality…”
BackgroundSelf-citation10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s010 · Cited by 869
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, and 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a diabetic kidney disease population with albuminuria (UACR of >300 to 5,000 mg/g) (187).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeuen, B. L., Young, T., Heerspink, H. J. L., Neal, B., Perkovic, V., Billot, L., Mahaffey, K. W., Charytan, D. M., Wheeler, D. C., Arnott, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30256-6 · Cited by 893
Self-citationMechanisms of Cardiovascular Benefits of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors
Lopaschuk, G. D., & Verma, S. (2020) · JACC Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004 · Cited by 941
Maddox, T. M., Januzzi, J. L., Allen, L. A., Breathett, K. K., Butler, J., Davis, L. L., Fonarow, G. C., Ibrahim, N. E., Lindenfeld, J., Masoudi, F. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022 · Cited by 872
SGLT2 inhibitors: mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit beyond glycaemic control
Cowie, M., & Fisher, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8 · Cited by 829
Delgado, C., Baweja, M., Crews, D. C., Eneanya, N. D., Gadegbeku, C. A., Inker, L. A., Mendu, M. L., Miller, W. G., Moxey-Mims, M. M., Roberts, G. V., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.003 · Cited by 783
Selby, N. M., & Taal, M. W. (2020) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.14007 · Cited by 831
Gornik, H. L., Aronow, H. D., Goodney, P. P., Arya, S., Brewster, L. P., Byrd, L., Chandra, V., Drachman, D. E., Eaves, J. M., Ehrman, J. K., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001251 · Cited by 771
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Bajaj, M., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s009 · Cited by 728
Basic Mechanisms of Diabetic Heart Disease
Ritchie, R. H., & Abel, E. D. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.315913 · Cited by 741
Diabetic vascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Gao, M., Wang, W., Chen, K., Huang, L., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01400-z · Cited by 799
Palmer, S. C., Tendal, B., Mustafa, R. A., Vandvik, P. O., Li, S., Hao, Q., Tunnicliffe, D., Ruospo, M., Natale, P., Saglimbene, V., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m4573 · Cited by 679
“No difference in the odds of serious hypoglycaemia was found in a comparison of SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment with placebo or with each other in high or moderate certainty evidence (appendix 8).”
BackgroundMosenzon, O., Wiviott, S. D., Cahn, A., Rozenberg, A., Yanuv, I., Goodrich, E. L., Murphy, S. A., Heerspink, H. J. L., Zelniker, T. A., Dwyer, J. P., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30180-9 · Cited by 684
Self-citationEpidemiology and risk of cardiovascular disease in populations with chronic kidney disease
Matsushita, K., Ballew, S. H., Wang, A. Y.-M., Kalyesubula, R., Schäeffner, E., & Agarwal, R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-022-00616-6 · Cited by 728
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for diabetic kidney disease
Tuttle, K. R., Agarwal, R., Alpers, C. E., Bakris, G. L., Brosius, F. C., Kolkhof, P., & Uribarri, J. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.012 · Cited by 724
Self-citationType 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: pathogenesis, prevention and therapy
Lu, X., Xie, Q., Pan, X., Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Peng, G., Zhang, Y., Shen, S., & Tong, N. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01951-9 · Cited by 895
Joseph, J. J., Deedwania, P., Acharya, T., Aguilar, D., Bhatt, D. L., Chyun, D. A., Di Palo, K. E., Golden, S. H., Sperling, L. S., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Arteriosclerosis, T. A. V. B. C. O. C. C. A. C. O. H. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001040 · Cited by 660
Antar, S. A., Ashour, N. A., Sharaky, M. M., Khattab, M., Ashour, N. A., Zaid, R. T., Roh, E. J., Elkamhawy, A., & Al-Karmalawy, A. A. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115734 · Cited by 812
Seferovic, P. M., Ponikowski, P. P., Anker, S. D., Bauersachs, J. K., Chioncel, O. D., Cleland, J. G. F., de Boer, R. A., Drexel, H., Gal, T. B., Hill, L., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1531 · Cited by 616
Garber, A. J., Handelsman, Y., Grunberger, G., Einhorn, D., Abrahamson, M. J., Barzilay, J. I., Blonde, L., Bush, M. A., DeFronzo, R. A., Garber, J. R., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/cs-2019-0472 · Cited by 598
Innate immunity in diabetic kidney disease
Tang, S. C. W., & Yiu, W. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0234-4 · Cited by 621
Pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease: impact of SGLT2 inhibitors
DeFronzo, R. A., Reeves, W. B., & Awad, A. S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-021-00393-8 · Cited by 627
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: established and emerging indications
Brown, E., Heerspink, H. J. L., Cuthbertson, D. J., & Wilding, J. P. H. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00536-5 · Cited by 581
Self-citationRabi, D. M., McBrien, K. A., Sapir-Pichhadze, R., Nakhla, M., Ahmed, S. B., Dumanski, S. M., Butalia, S., Leung, A. A., Harris, K. C., Cloutier, L., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.086 · Cited by 583
Shlipak, M. G., Tummalapalli, S. L., Boulware, L. E., Grams, M. E., Ix, J. H., Jha, V., Kengne, A.-P., Madero, M., Mihaylova, B., Tangri, N., et al. (2021) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012 · Cited by 581
“SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD with proteinuria and diabetes reduce the risk of kidney failure by 30%–40%.(18,19) 3.”
BackgroundVerma, S., Mazer, C. D., Yan, A. T.-K., Mason, T., Garg, V., Teoh, H., Zuo, F., Quan, A., Farkouh, M. E., FITCHETT, D. H., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.042375 · Cited by 596
Self-citationInsulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis: Implications for Insulin-Sensitizing Agents
Di Pino, A., & DeFronzo, R. A. (2019) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00141 · Cited by 535
Kittleson, M. M., Panjrath, G. S., Amancherla, K., Davis, L. L., Deswal, A., Dixon, D. L., Januzzi, J. L., & Yancy, C. W. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.393 · Cited by 554
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Visseren, F. L. J., Mach, F., Smulders, Y. M., Carballo, D., Koskinas, K. C., Bäck, M., Bénétos, A., Biffi, A., Boavida, J.-M., Capodanno, D., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwab154 · Cited by 586
Emerging Targets in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Complications
Demir, S., Nawroth, P. P., Herzig, S., & Üstünel, B. E. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202100275 · Cited by 582
Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Kidney and Cardiovascular Function
Vallon, V., & Verma, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-095920 · Cited by 556
“Na+ reabsorption downstream to S3 and mTAL segments increases QO2 (10) and lowers PO2 in the outer medulla (OM) (5).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBlonde, L., Umpierrez, G. E., Reddy, S. S., McGill, J. B., Berga, S. L., Bush, M., Chandrasekaran, S., DeFronzo, R. A., Einhorn, D., Galindo, R. J., et al. (2022) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002 · Cited by 507
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s010 · Cited by 495
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020
American Diabetes Association (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-s010 · Cited by 487
Buse, J. B., Wexler, D. J., Tsapas, A., Rossing, P., Mingrone, G., Mathieu, C., D’Alessio, D. A., & Davies, M. J. (2020) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w · Cited by 487
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Das, S. R., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s010 · Cited by 465
Das, S. R., Everett, B. M., Birtcher, K. K., Brown, J. M., Januzzi, J. L., Kalyani, R. R., Kosiborod, M., Magwire, M., Morris, P. B., Neumiller, J. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.037 · Cited by 466
“Benefits and adverse effects in the group with the lowest eGFR were consistent with those in the remainder of the cohort (19).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence
Collins, R., Bowman, L. J., Landray, M., & Peto, R. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb1901642 · Cited by 490
Authors/Task Force Members:, McDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.3024 · Cited by 512
Zelniker, T. A., Bonaca, M. P., Furtado, R. H. M., Mosenzon, O., Kuder, J. F., Murphy, S. A., Bhatt, D. L., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Wilding, J. P. H., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.044183 · Cited by 459
The tubular hypothesis of nephron filtration and diabetic kidney disease
Vallon, V., & Thomson, S. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0256-y · Cited by 465
Damman, K., Beusekamp, J. C., Boorsma, E. M., Swart, H. P., Smilde, T. D. J., Elvan, A., van Eck, J. W. M., Heerspink, H. J. L., & Voors, A. A. (2020) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1713 · Cited by 480
Self-citationSignaling pathways of chronic kidney diseases, implications for therapeutics
Yuan, Q., Tang, B., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01036-5 · Cited by 508
“62 years.(310) Canagliflozin also decreased the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with DN.”
BackgroundPacker, M., Anker, S. D., Butler, J., Filippatos, G., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S. J., Carson, P., Anand, I., Doehner, W., Haass, M., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.051783 · Cited by 435
“Events that were considered to reflect clinical deterioration included: (1) worsening heart failure that required the use of an intravenous drug for heart failure in an emergency department; (2) worsening heart failure that required the use of an intravenous drug for heart failure in an outpatient urgent care setting;…”
BackgroundBone fragility in diabetes: novel concepts and clinical implications
Hofbauer, L. C., Busse, B., Eastell, R., Ferrari, S., Frost, M., Müller, R., Burden, A. M., Rivadeneira, F., Napoli, N., & Rauner, M. (2022) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00347-8 · Cited by 478
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Das, S. R., Ekhlaspour, L., Hilliard, M. E., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc24-s010 · Cited by 438
Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease
Jia, G., & Sowers, J. R. (2021) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17981 · Cited by 493
Caleyachetty, R., Barber, T. M., Mohammed, N. I., Cappuccio, F. P., Hardy, R., Mathur, R., Banerjee, A., & Gill, P. (2021) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00088-7 · Cited by 429
Nassif, M. E., Windsor, S. L., Tang, F., Khariton, Y., Husain, M., Inzucchi, S. E., McGuire, D. K., Pitt, B., Scirica, B. M., Austin, B., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.042929 · Cited by 424
Microvascular Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiometabolic Disease
Horton, W. B., & Barrett, E. J. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa025 · Cited by 461
Delgado, C., Baweja, M., Crews, D. C., Eneanya, N. D., Gadegbeku, C. A., Inker, L. A., Mendu, M. L., Miller, W. G., Moxey‐Mims, M., Roberts, G. V., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2021070988 · Cited by 442
“73 m(2) on the basis of the CKD-EPI equation.(37) Using the creatinine-based equations that would remove race and report high muscle mass and low muscle mass or high value and low value (approaches CKD-EPIcr_MM and CKD-EPIcr_H/ L), trial inclusion and outcomes would likely be similar, if not identical, to the original…”
BackgroundDiabetic Nephropathy: An Overview
Sagoo, M. K., & Gnudi, L. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9841-8_1 · Cited by 439
Pop‐Busui, R., Januzzi, J. L., Bruemmer, D., Butalia, S., Green, J. B., Horton, W. B., Knight, C. M., Levi, M., Rasouli, N., & Richardson, C. R. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0014 · Cited by 442
Hypertension as Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Chronic Kidney Disease
Burnier, M., & Damianaki, A. (2023) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.122.321762 · Cited by 473
11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s011 · Cited by 395
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of ESRD over control (26).”
BackgroundInfluential11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes−2020
American Diabetes Association (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-s011 · Cited by 460
“cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (24,74).”
BackgroundInfluentialMatthews, D. R., Paldánius, P. M., Proot, P., Chiang, Y., Stumvoll, M., & Del Prato, S. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32131-2 · Cited by 364
Zoccali, C., Mallamaci, F., Adamczak, M., de Oliveira, R. B., Massy, Z. A., Sarafidis, P. A., Agarwal, R., Mark, P. B., Kotanko, P., Ferro, C. J., et al. (2023) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvad083 · Cited by 399
“156 Three major trials, (i) the Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes, 157 a sub-study of the Empagliflozin, CV outcomes, and mortality in Type 2 diabetes, (ii) the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation, 158 and (iii) the Dapagliflozin…”
Self-citationLipotoxicity and Diabetic Nephropathy: Novel Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Opportunities
Opazo-Ríos, L., Mas, S., Marín-Royo, G., Mezzano, S., Gómez-Guerrero, C., Moreno, J. A., & Egido, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072632 · Cited by 363
van Bommel, E. J. M., Muskiet, M. H. A., van Baar, M. J. B., Tonneijck, L., Smits, M. M., Emanuel, A. L., Bozovic, A., Danser, A. H. J., Geurts, F., Hoorn, E. J., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.013 · Cited by 363
Kidney lipid dysmetabolism and lipid droplet accumulation in chronic kidney disease
Mitrofanova, A. V., Merscher, S., & Fornoni, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-023-00741-w · Cited by 382
Packer, M., Butler, J., Zannad, F. M., Filippatos, G. S., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S., Carson, P. E., Anand, I. S., Doehner, W., Haass, M., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.056824 · Cited by 368
de Boer, I. H., Khunti, K., Sadusky, T., Tuttle, K. R., Neumiller, J. J., Rhee, C. M., Rosas, S. E., Rossing, P. R., & Bakris, G. L. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.012 · Cited by 389
Self-citationNeuen, B. L., Heerspink, H. J. L., Vart, P., Claggett, B. L., Fletcher, R. A., Arnott, C., de Oliveira Costa, J., Falster, M. O., Pearson, S.-A., Mahaffey, K. W., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.067584 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkovic, V., Jardine, M. J., Neal, B., Bompoint, S., Heerspink, H. J. L., Charytan, D. M., Edwards, R., Agarwal, R., Bakris, G., Bull, S., Cannon, C. P., Capuano, G., Chu, P.-L., de Zeeuw, D., Greene, T., Levin, A., Pollock, C., Wheeler, D. C., Yavin, Y., Zhang, H., Zinman, B., Meininger, G., Brenner, B. M., & Mahaffey, K. W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- From the George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales Sydney (V.P., M.J.J., B.N., S. Bompoint), the Royal North Shore Hospital (V.P.), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (M.J.J.), and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney (B.N.), Sydney, and the Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW (C.P.) — all in Australia; Imperial College London (B.N.) and the Department of Renal...
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-06-13
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2295-2306
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2939222610
- Semantic Scholar
- 043a4b59176d4f2db8d5636dfb3b6f53d0e41867
- Cited by
- 6,189
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 666 · 2025: 733 · 2024: 833 · 2023: 892 · 2022: 900 · 2021: 954 · 2020: 841 · 2019: 353
- FWCI
- 588.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- canagliflozin, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, SGLT2 inhibitors, renal outcomes, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, kidney failure prevention, renal function decline, cardiovascular safety, early trial termination
- MeSH terms
- Canagliflozin, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-16, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-16 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review