Cited by 212Digital Platforms and EconomicsOpen Source Software InnovationsInnovation and Knowledge Management

How open is this Platform? The Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementers’ Perspective

Benlian, Alexander, Hilkert, Daniel, Hess, Thomas·2015·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Software platforms’ success largely depends on complementors’ willingness to repeatedly invest their time and effort to the development of platform applications that attract users and increase the platform's installed base. But how can platform providers encourage desirable behaviours by complementors (i.e., application developers) in the absence of formal roles and hierarchical control structures? Although previous studies of software-based platforms have identified openness as critical instrument at the macro (i.e., platform) level and have provided initial attempts to measure the construct, no research has been dedicated to comprehensively conceptualize and operationalize platform openness at the micro level from the perspective of application developers. To go beyond these preliminary findings and to theorize about the nature and effects of platform openness as perceived by application developers, we develop a construct called perceived platform openness (PPO). Drawing on recently advanced scale development methodologies, we conceptualize PPO as a multidimensional construct and empirically validate it with important consequent variables linked to developers’ continuous platform contributions. Empirical evidence from several rounds of qualitative and quantitative steps supports the conceptual validity of the construct and empirical relevance of the scale across different smartphone platform contexts (i.e., Apple iOS and Google Android). Researchers will benefit from the study's systematic and comprehensive conceptualization of PPO, how it is measured, and how it relates to critical application developer beliefs and attitudes. Platform managers may use our results to target the underlying facets of PPO most likely to contribute to the platform's long-term goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jit.2015.6

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The governance between the digital platform and its surrounding ecosystem is moderated by boundary resources, such as APIs and SDKs, that establish a common toolset and interpretation standard for complementors to build on.

    “The governance between the digital platform and its surrounding ecosystem is moderated by boundary resources, such as Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and Software Development Kits (SDKs), that establish a common toolset and interpretation standard for complementors to build on (Benlian et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., & Hess, T.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • Boston Consulting Group (United States) (US)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Benlian, Alexander
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2015-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
209-228
ISSN
  • 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4437
OpenAlex
W2256583476
Cited by
212
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
FWCI
38.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
platform openness, software platform, app developers, complementors, developer attitudes, scale development, smartphone platforms, iOS, Android

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review