Cited by 116Digital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions

Cenamor, Javier·2021·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.016

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cenamor, J.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Cenamor, Javier
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
122
Pages
335-343
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087237957
Cited by
116
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
platform ecosystems, complementors, strategic decision-making, open innovation, platform adoption, ecosystem strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review