Cited by 26Thermal properties of materialsThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena

Interpretation of thermoreflectance measurements with a two-temperature model including non-surface heat deposition

Regner, K. T., Wei, L. C., Malen, J. A.·2015·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

We develop a solution to the two-temperature diffusion equation in axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates to model heat transport in thermoreflectance experiments. Our solution builds upon prior solutions that account for two-channel diffusion in each layer of an N-layered geometry, but adds the ability to deposit heat at any location within each layer. We use this solution to account for non-surface heating in the transducer layer of thermoreflectance experiments that challenge the timescales of electron-phonon coupling. A sensitivity analysis is performed to identify important parameters in the solution and to establish a guideline for when to use the two-temperature model to interpret thermoreflectance data. We then fit broadband frequency domain thermoreflectance (BB-FDTR) measurements of SiO2 and platinum at a temperature of 300 K with our two-temperature solution to parameterize the gold/chromium transducer layer. We then refit BB-FDTR measurements of silicon and find that accounting for non-equilibrium between electrons and phonons in the gold layer does lessen the previously observed heating frequency dependence reported in Regner et al. [Nat. Commun. 4, 1640 (2013)] but does not completely eliminate it. We perform BB-FDTR experiments on silicon with an aluminum transducer and find limited heating frequency dependence, in agreement with time domain thermoreflectance results. We hypothesize that the discrepancy between thermoreflectance measurements with different transducers results in part from spectrally dependent phonon transmission at the transducer/silicon interface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4937995

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regner, K. T., Wei, L. C., & Malen, J. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2015-12-21
Volume
118
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2281536086
Cited by
26
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ENG-1149374)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-14-0350)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Keywords
thermoreflectance, two-temperature model, electron-phonon coupling, silicon, platinum, silica, phonon transmission, sensitivity analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review