Cited by 112Thermal properties of materialsThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena

Two-channel model for nonequilibrium thermal transport in pump-probe experiments

Wilson, R. B., Feser, Joseph P., Hohensee, Gregory T., Cahill, David G.·2013·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present an analytic solution for heat flow in a multilayer two-channel system for the interpretation of time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) experiments where nonequilibrium effects are important. The two-channel solution is used to analyze new room temperature TDTR measurements of Al/Cu and Al/Si${}_{0.99}$Ge${}_{0.01}$ systems. Cu and Si${}_{0.99}$Ge${}_{0.01}$ are examples of materials well suited for analysis with a two-channel model because thermal excitations responsible for the vast majority of the heat capacity in these solids contribute little to their thermal conductivity. Nonequilibrium effects are found to be unimportant for the interpretation of the Al/Cu TDTR data but dramatic for the Al/Si${}_{0.99}$Ge${}_{0.01}$ TDTR data. The two-channel model predicts a significant reduction in the effective thermal conductivity of Si${}_{0.99}$Ge${}_{0.01}$ in a region within 150 nm of the Al/Si${}_{0.99}$Ge${}_{0.01}$ interface. The extra thermal resistance in this region is a result of the disparate heat flux boundary conditions for low- and high-frequency phonons in combination with weak coupling between low- and high-frequency phonons. When the experimental data are analyzed with a single-channel model, both the conductance and thermal conductivity appear to depend on pump-modulation frequency, consistent with the two-channel model's predictions. Finally, we compare the results of our diffusive two-channel model to a nonlocal description for steady-state heat flow near a boundary and show they yield nearly identical results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.88.144305

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the two-channel model and the ballistic/diffusive model reveal the critical influence of the interface on frequency dependent thermal transport.

    “Importantly, both theories reveal the critical influence of the interface on frequency dependent thermal transport, thus underscoring the significance of the transducer/sample boundary condition.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, R. B., Feser, J. P., Hohensee, G. T., & Cahill, D. G.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
88
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2321018845
Cited by
112
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Keywords
two-channel model, time-domain thermoreflectance, thermal conductivity, phonon boundary scattering, low-frequency phonons, high-frequency phonons, phonon-phonon interaction, thermal resistance, Cu/Al interface, multilayer systems, nonlocal heat transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review