Cited by 501Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Bacterial biota in the human distal esophagus

Open access
Pei, Zhiheng, Bini, Edmund J., Yang, Liying, Zhou, Meisheng, Francois, Fritz, Blaser, Martin J.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The esophagus, like other luminal organs of the digestive system, provides a potential environment for bacterial colonization, but little is known about the presence of a bacterial biota or its nature. By using broad-range 16S rDNA PCR, biopsies were examined from the normal esophagus of four human adults. The 900 PCR products cloned represented 833 unique sequences belonging to 41 genera, or 95 species-level operational taxonomic units (SLOTU); 59 SLOTU were homologous with culture-defined bacterial species, 34 with 16S rDNA clones, and two were not homologous with any known bacterial 16S rDNA. Members of six phyla, Firmicutes , Bacteroides , Actinobacteria , Proteobacteria , Fusobacteria , and TM7 , were represented. A large majority of clones belong to 13 of the 41 genera (783/900, 87%), or 14 SLOTU (574/900, 64%) that were shared by all four persons. Streptococcus (39%), Prevotella (17%), and Veilonella (14%) were most prevalent. The present study identified ≈56–79% of SLOTU in this bacterial ecosystem. Most SLOTU of esophageal biota are similar or identical to residents of the upstream oral biota, but the major distinction is that a large majority (82%) of the esophageal bacteria are known and cultivable. These findings provide evidence for a complex but conserved bacterial population in the normal distal esophagus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0306398101

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distal esophagus is mostly colonized by Firmicutes, followed by Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria, with the most represented genera being Streptococcus, followed by Prevotella and Veillonella.

    “The distal tract is mostly colonized by Firmicutes, followed by Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria, with the most represented genera being Streptococcus, followed by Prevotella and Veillonella[35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kroes, I., Lepp, P. W. & Relman, D. A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14547-14552.
  2. Ghose, C., Perez-Perez, G. I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Pride, D. T., Bravi, C. M. & Blaser, M. J. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15107-15111.
  3. Nealson, K. H. & Conrad, P. G. (1999) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 354, 1923-1939.
  4. Colwell, R. R. & Grimes, D. J. (Am. Soc. Microbiol. Press, Washington, DC), pp. 325-342.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pei, Z., Bini, E. J., Yang, L., Zhou, M., Francois, F., & Blaser, M. J.
Affiliations
  • VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
  • Departments of Pathology, Medicine, and Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; and Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-03-11
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
4250-4255
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2056246809
Cited by
501
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9318128)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA097946)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM063270)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058587)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000096)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
distal esophagus, oral microbiota, bacterial colonization, 16S rRNA gene, operational taxonomic units, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Veillonella, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, TM7, human gut microbiome
MeSH terms
Bacteria, DNA, Ribosomal, Esophagus, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review