Cited by 657Protist diversity and phylogenyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 49 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?

Open access
Douzery, Emmanuel J. P., Snell, Elizabeth A., Bapteste, Eric, Delsuc, Frédéric, Philippe, Hervé·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The use of nucleotide and amino acid sequences allows improved understanding of the timing of evolutionary events of life on earth. Molecular estimates of divergence times are, however, controversial and are generally much more ancient than suggested by the fossil record. The limited number of genes and species explored and pervasive variations in evolutionary rates are the most likely sources of such discrepancies. Here we compared concatenated amino acid sequences of 129 proteins from 36 eukaryotes to determine the divergence times of several major clades, including animals, fungi, plants, and various protists. Due to significant variations in their evolutionary rates, and to handle the uncertainty of the fossil record, we used a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock simultaneously calibrated by six paleontological constraints. We show that, according to 95% credibility intervals, the eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950–1,259 million years ago (Mya), animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761–957 Mya, and the debated age of the split between protostomes and deuterostomes occurred 642–761 Mya. The divergence times appeared to be robust with respect to prior assumptions and paleontological calibrations. Interestingly, these relaxed clock time estimates are much more recent than those obtained under the assumption of a global molecular clock, yet bilaterian diversification appears to be ≈100 million years more ancient than the Cambrian boundary.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A Bayesian relaxed molecular clock applied to 129 concatenated proteins from 36 eukaryotes yields much more recent divergence times than a global molecular clock, while still placing bilaterian diversification ≈100 million years before the Cambrian boundary. The authors argue that relaxed-clock dates partially reconcile molecular and fossil evidence.

Key findings

  • The major eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950–1,259 Mya (mean 1,085), Plantae originated 892–1,162 Mya (mean 1,010), red algae branched off 825–1,061 Mya (mean 928), and stem land plants separated from green algae 662–812 Mya (mean 729).
  • Animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761–957 Mya (mean 849), the protostome/deuterostome split occurred 642–761 Mya (mean 695), animals diverged from fungi 872–1,127 Mya (mean 983), and ascomycetes diverged from basidiomycetes ≈629–837 Mya (mean 727).
  • Relaxed-clock estimates were on average 1.5 times more recent than a global-clock time scale; simulations showed that a global clock on variable-rate data overestimated ages (e.g., bilaterians 864 ± 9 Mya vs. expected 695 Mya; root 1,541 ± 14 Mya vs. expected 1,085 Mya).
  • Missing data had little effect: across all nodes, the mean difference was −0.2% ± 2.8, and a 1,000-Myr change in the root prior changed posterior divergence ages by only 16 Myr on average.

Methods

  • Concatenated amino acid sequences of 129 nuclear proteins from 36 animals, fungi, plants, and protists; after removing two-thirds of sites due to ambiguous alignment, 30,399 positions remained, with ≈25% missing character states. The tree was rooted by *Dictyostelium*, with an alternative kinetoplastid rooting also considered.
  • Divergence times were estimated with a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock using `estbranches` and `divtime`, calibrated simultaneously by six independent paleontological constraints; MCMC runs used 10 million generations after 100,000 burn-in generations, with 95% credibility intervals.
  • Simulation studies generated 10 matrices of 36 taxa and 30,399 amino acid positions under variable-rate and constant-rate models, and tested the impact of missing data and prior assumptions.

Limitations

  • Stated: molecular dating is controversial; discrepancies arise from limited gene/species sampling, pervasive rate variation, and uncertainty in the fossil record. The authors note that calibration choice affects estimates, root location is uncertain among eukaryotes, ≈25% of amino acids are missing, and extrapolation beyond calibrations may bias deeper nodes.
  • Stated: the six calibrations are restricted to green plants, animals, and fungi, so many protist divergences lack direct fossil calibration; improved gene and species sampling and more realistic rate models are needed.
  • Evident from the text: some genes are absent for some taxa, and the study relies on prior gamma distributions for root age, root rate, and rate autocorrelation, although sensitivity analyses suggested posterior ages were only slightly sensitive to root-age priors.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0403984101

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 49 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 73 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
45 of 45
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plastids surrounded by four membranes originated from secondary endosymbiosis, in which a red alga was engulfed and retained by a flagellate protist.

    “Plastids surrounded by four membranes originated from secondary endosymbiosis, in which a red alga was engulfed and retained by a flagellate protist.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026 · DOI
  2. Philippe, H., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Lopez, P., Holland, P. W. H. & Casane, D. (2004) Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 1740-1752.
  3. Philippe, H., Lopez, P., Brinkmann, H., Budin, K., Germot, A., Laurent, J., Moreira, D., Müller, M. & Le Guyader, H. (2000) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 267, 1213-1221.
  4. Grassly, N. C., Adachi, J. & Rambaut, A. (1997) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 559-560.9367131
  5. Shields, R. (2004) Trends Genet. 20, 221-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Douzery, E. J. P., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F., & Philippe, H.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-10-19
Volume
101
Issue
43
Pages
15386-15391
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2059383371
Cited by
638
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
eukaryotic evolution, divergence time estimation, relaxed molecular clock, protein sequences, fossil calibration, choanoflagellates, protists, animals, fungi, plants
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review