The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 49 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?
Open accessAbstract
The use of nucleotide and amino acid sequences allows improved understanding of the timing of evolutionary events of life on earth. Molecular estimates of divergence times are, however, controversial and are generally much more ancient than suggested by the fossil record. The limited number of genes and species explored and pervasive variations in evolutionary rates are the most likely sources of such discrepancies. Here we compared concatenated amino acid sequences of 129 proteins from 36 eukaryotes to determine the divergence times of several major clades, including animals, fungi, plants, and various protists. Due to significant variations in their evolutionary rates, and to handle the uncertainty of the fossil record, we used a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock simultaneously calibrated by six paleontological constraints. We show that, according to 95% credibility intervals, the eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950–1,259 million years ago (Mya), animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761–957 Mya, and the debated age of the split between protostomes and deuterostomes occurred 642–761 Mya. The divergence times appeared to be robust with respect to prior assumptions and paleontological calibrations. Interestingly, these relaxed clock time estimates are much more recent than those obtained under the assumption of a global molecular clock, yet bilaterian diversification appears to be ≈100 million years more ancient than the Cambrian boundary.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A Bayesian relaxed molecular clock applied to 129 concatenated proteins from 36 eukaryotes yields much more recent divergence times than a global molecular clock, while still placing bilaterian diversification ≈100 million years before the Cambrian boundary. The authors argue that relaxed-clock dates partially reconcile molecular and fossil evidence.
Key findings
- The major eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950–1,259 Mya (mean 1,085), Plantae originated 892–1,162 Mya (mean 1,010), red algae branched off 825–1,061 Mya (mean 928), and stem land plants separated from green algae 662–812 Mya (mean 729).
- Animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761–957 Mya (mean 849), the protostome/deuterostome split occurred 642–761 Mya (mean 695), animals diverged from fungi 872–1,127 Mya (mean 983), and ascomycetes diverged from basidiomycetes ≈629–837 Mya (mean 727).
- Relaxed-clock estimates were on average 1.5 times more recent than a global-clock time scale; simulations showed that a global clock on variable-rate data overestimated ages (e.g., bilaterians 864 ± 9 Mya vs. expected 695 Mya; root 1,541 ± 14 Mya vs. expected 1,085 Mya).
- Missing data had little effect: across all nodes, the mean difference was −0.2% ± 2.8, and a 1,000-Myr change in the root prior changed posterior divergence ages by only 16 Myr on average.
Methods
- Concatenated amino acid sequences of 129 nuclear proteins from 36 animals, fungi, plants, and protists; after removing two-thirds of sites due to ambiguous alignment, 30,399 positions remained, with ≈25% missing character states. The tree was rooted by *Dictyostelium*, with an alternative kinetoplastid rooting also considered.
- Divergence times were estimated with a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock using `estbranches` and `divtime`, calibrated simultaneously by six independent paleontological constraints; MCMC runs used 10 million generations after 100,000 burn-in generations, with 95% credibility intervals.
- Simulation studies generated 10 matrices of 36 taxa and 30,399 amino acid positions under variable-rate and constant-rate models, and tested the impact of missing data and prior assumptions.
Limitations
- Stated: molecular dating is controversial; discrepancies arise from limited gene/species sampling, pervasive rate variation, and uncertainty in the fossil record. The authors note that calibration choice affects estimates, root location is uncertain among eukaryotes, ≈25% of amino acids are missing, and extrapolation beyond calibrations may bias deeper nodes.
- Stated: the six calibrations are restricted to green plants, animals, and fungi, so many protist divergences lack direct fossil calibration; improved gene and species sampling and more realistic rate models are needed.
- Evident from the text: some genes are absent for some taxa, and the study relies on prior gamma distributions for root age, root rate, and rate autocorrelation, although sensitivity analyses suggested posterior ages were only slightly sensitive to root-age priors.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 49 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“followed by their diversification in <200 Myr (Fig. 1).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The divergence between animals and fungi was, for example, estimated 872–1,127 Mya (mean 983 Mya)”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Credibility intervals at 95% indicated that the basal split between the major eukaryotic kingdoms documented here occurred 950–1,259 Mya (mean 1,085), followed by their diversification in <200 Myr (Fig. 1).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“We show that, according to 95% credibility intervals, the eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950–1,259 million years ago (Mya)”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the rate of amino acid replacements extensively changed among the eukaryote lineages here analyzed.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“red algae branched off 825–1,061 Mya (mean 928)”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A likelihood ratio test significantly rejected the hypothesis of a clocklike behavior of our data (P < 0.0001).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The divergence between choanoflagellates and animals was estimated during the Late Proterozoic, between 761 and 957 Mya (mean 849).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761–957 Mya”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Plantae originated 892–1,162 Mya (mean 1,010)”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“stem land plants separated from green algae 662–812 Mya (mean 729)”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the divergence time between protostomes and deuterostomes (Fig. 1) was 642–761 Mya (mean 695).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“the debated age of the split between protostomes and deuterostomes occurred 642–761 Mya”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- It may state two separate claims as one. 32
- Probably not a substantial claim. 22
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, trypanosomes and nematodes evolved two and three times faster than mammals, respectively (data not shown).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On average, the relative differences are, respectively, + 1.7% and -2.5% for ages that are over- and underestimated by missing data.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They were also less precise, as attested by 95% credibility interval widths relative to global clock estimates, because of the greater number of parameters involved (22).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Aris-Brosou, S. & Yang, Z. (2003) Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1947-1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of missing data leads to slightly under- or overestimated divergence ages, depending on the node under focus, and induces a mean difference of -0.2% ± 2.8 over all nodes (extreme values, -9.8 to + 8.7%).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No trend toward a rate increase far back in time is observed, and the rate for the last common bilaterian ancestor is close to the mean rate measured along the eukaryotic phylogeny.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contrary to all previous studies with such a large sample of genes, a reasonable taxonomic diversity (36 species) was sampled.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The greatest contrast (ratio >2.0) between global and relaxed clock ages is observed for alveolates, nematodes, and kinetoplastids, i.e., the fastest-evolving taxa for the 129 proteins here evaluated.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such an average impact over all nodes indicated that a 1,000-Myr variation of the root prior will involve a posterior divergence age variation of only 16 Myr, which is far less than the order of magnitude of the uncertainty on the divergence ages themselves.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, half of the total number of proteins contains at most three missing taxa over 36, and 25% of the amino acids are missing in our final alignment.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relaxed clock timings were accurate, although slightly deeper when estimated on constant-rate data.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, comparison of a priori and a posteriori age estimates for calibration nodes did not reveal any systematic trend (Table 3, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site), suggesting that paleontological uncertainties did not bias our calculations, because they were incorporated in the dating”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Under the maximum likelihood topology inferred from the five plastid proteins, and enforcing the angiosperms, spermatophytes, and land plant nodes between 90 and 130, 290 and 320, and 432 and 476 Mya (50), would involve a red algae diversification between 392 and 761 Mya (mean 551 Mya) and a Chondrus/Palmaria split between 165 and 381 Mya.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Yoon, H. S., Hackett, J. D., Ciniglia, C., Pinto, G. & Bhattacharya, D. (2004) Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 809-818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Molecular ages are more recent than the fossil record for red algae but more ancient for animals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Close to the Meso-/Neo-Proterozoic transition, choanoflagellates diverged from their closest animal relatives, marking the dawn of cellular cooperation in animals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Molecular dating with a kinetoplastid rooting would be in better agreement with this fossil (95% credibility interval, 899-1191; Fig. 1), but such a rooting might represent a tree reconstruction artifact (36).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Philippe, H., Lopez, P., Brinkmann, H., Budin, K., Germot, A., Laurent, J., Moreira, D., Müller, M. & Le Guyader, H. (2000) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 267, 1213-1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This value is much lower than most of the previously published ones (12, 17, 46) but is close to recent estimates (22, 23)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Hedges, S. B. (2002) Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838-849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Wang, D. Y., Kumar, S. & Hedges, S. B. (1999) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 266, 163-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [46] Wray, G. A., Levinton, J. S. & Shapiro, L. H. (1996) Science 274, 568-573. [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The limited number of genes and species explored and pervasive variations in evolutionary rates are the most likely sources of such discrepancies.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To explicitly incorporate the inherent uncertainty of paleontological estimates, each primary calibration was defined as a prior time constraint, with lower and/or upper bounds.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Changes in reference topology may potentially affect molecular dating (39).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Sanderson, M. J. & Doyle, J. A. (2001) Am. J. Bot. 88, 1499-1516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“extrapolation could conduct to rates increasing on average when moving far back in time.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A similar result was obtained for animals under various models of clock relaxation (22, 28) and for mitochondrial genomes of mammals (29).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Aris-Brosou, S. & Yang, Z. (2003) Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1947-1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Aris-Brosou, S. & Yang, Z. (2002) Syst. Biol. 51, 703-714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Hasegawa, M., Thorne, J. L. & Kishino, H. (2003) Genes Genet. Syst. 78, 267-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The best topology (Fig. 1) was rooted by Dictyostelium, as suggested by a derived gene fusion separating opisthokonts (animals, choanoflagellates, and fungi) from bikonts (eukaryotes ancestrally with two cilia) (36, 37).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Philippe, H., Lopez, P., Brinkmann, H., Budin, K., Germot, A., Laurent, J., Moreira, D., Müller, M. & Le Guyader, H. (2000) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 267, 1213-1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Not checked yetcites [37] Stechmann, A. & Cavalier-Smith, T. (2002) Science 297, 89-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Posterior divergence times were identical for different MCMC started independently, evidencing convergence of the Bayesian dating procedure.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, the concomitant use of six calibration constraints chosen among plants, fungi, and animals (Fig. 1) also helped to more accurately measure the absolute amino acid replacement rates in these three distinct clades and stabilized the Bayesian divergence times on the whole tree.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whereas a recent study using a global clock method on a similar number of proteins, but a lower number of taxa and calibration points, yielded 1,200 Mya (45).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Heckman, D. S., Geiser, D. M., Eidell, B. R., Stauffer, R. L., Kardos, N. L. & Hedges, S. B. (2001) Science 293, 1129-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Divergence times were estimated under a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock (33), constrained by six independent fossil references.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L. & Bruno, W. J. (2001) Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 352-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to ambiguous alignment, two-thirds of the sites were conservatively removed to ensure the sitewise homology of the remaining 30,399 positions at this deep evolutionary time scale.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, increased rates, faster earlier and slower since the Neoproterozoic/Cambrian transition, may result in estimates that are apparently too recent for deeper nodes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Molecular clocks are highly controversial, dates from various sources being often so different that some researchers doubt that molecular dating of evolutionary events is possible (49).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Shields, R. (2004) Trends Genet. 20, 221-222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We verified orthology through the analysis of each gene with standard phylogenetic methods, and we discarded several proteins, including some that were frequently used for studying eukaryotic evolution (tubulins, actin, and HSP70).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The use of seven concatenated proteins and the nonparametric rate smoothing r8s approach (31) indicate a more recent occurrence of the last common bilaterian ancestor, between 556 and 592 Mya (23) instead of 642–761 here.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Sanderson, M. J. (1997) Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1218-1231. [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Peterson, K. J., Lyons, J. B., Nowak, K. S., Takacs, C. M., Wargo, M. J. & McPeek, M. A. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6536-6541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The uncertainty of divergence time estimates was characterized by 95% credibility intervals, calculated after sorting the 100,000 MCMC samples, and then reporting the 2,501st and 97,500th values.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 100,000Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our reasonable taxon coverage in this large multiprotein framework involves that some genes are lacking for some taxa, leading to ≈25% of missing character states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“suggesting that paleontological uncertainties did not bias our calculations, because they were incorporated in the dating procedure (31, 33).”
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Around 1,000 Mya, the diversification of plants may have been facilitated by the primary endosymbiotic event that led to plastids.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The present study illustrates how geological and biological records of organismal evolution might be partially reconciliated by using molecular relaxed clock datings from large genomic comparisons.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to protein data, the divergence of the main stem groups of metazoans (Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Lophotrochozoa) would have occurred in the Late Neoproterozoic, but their diversification would date close to the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, it has been proposed that a major increase in atmospheric oxygen level occurred between 1,000 and 640 Mya (54).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Canfield, D. E. & Teske, A. (1996) Nature 382, 127-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Even if cytoskeletal and ecological prerequisites for eukaryote diversification were already established some 1,500 Mya (3), the postulated anoxic and sulfidic redox status of oceans between ≈2,000 and 1,000 Mya might have limited the rise of photosynthetic eukaryotes (53).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Anbar, A. D. & Knoll, A. H. (2002) Science 297, 1137-1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Previous molecular datings yielded molecular ages always more ancient than paleontological ones, but often to a large extent (12, 15, 20, 46).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Hedges, S. B. (2002) Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838-849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Gu, X. (1998) J. Mol. Evol. 47, 369-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Nei, M., Xu, P. & Glazko, G. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2497-2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the basis of a tree derived from five concatenated plastid proteins, calibrated by five intervals under the r8s approach, Yoon et al. (50) suggested a red–green algae split between 1,591 and 1,757 Mya, instead of 825–1,061 or 899–1,191 Mya here, depending on the root location.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Yoon, H. S., Hackett, J. D., Ciniglia, C., Pinto, G. & Bhattacharya, D. (2004) Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 809-818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In association with the Neoproterozoic appearance of more fully oxic oceans (53), this major transition toward a more oxygenic environment could possibly have accelerated the diversification of the eukaryotic organisms, thanks to the aerobic respiration provided by mitochondria (55).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Anbar, A. D. & Knoll, A. H. (2002) Science 297, 1137-1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Philippe, H. & Adoutte, A. (1998) in Evolutionary Relationships Among Protozoa, eds. Coombs, G., Vickerman, K., Sleigh, M. & Warren, A. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 25-56.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the same paper, calculations conducted by modeling such a rate variation with a gamma distribution yield a confidence interval of 636–678 Mya for the bilaterian diversification, i.e., an estimate overlapping with ours.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Peterson, K. J., Lyons, J. B., Nowak, K. S., Takacs, C. M., Wargo, M. J. & McPeek, M. A. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6536-6541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whereas a fossil of 1,200 Mya has been interpreted as belonging to a specific subgroup of red algae, i.e., bangiophytes (4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Butterfield, N. J. (2000) Paleobiology 26, 386-404. [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The major eukaryotic kingdoms therefore originated much more recently than previously thought (12) but did not seem to have been affected by the postulated global glaciations (“snowball Earth” hypothesis) between 750 and 600 Mya (56).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Hedges, S. B. (2002) Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838-849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [56] Lubick, N. (2002) Nature 417, 12-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Plastids surrounded by four membranes originated from secondary endosymbiosis, in which a red alga was engulfed and retained by a flagellate protist.
“Plastids surrounded by four membranes originated from secondary endosymbiosis, in which a red alga was engulfed and retained by a flagellate protist.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, much of metazoan divergence appears closely tied to the Marinoan glaciation, although with the broad uncertainties inherent in molecular clock studies, we can make no claims for any”
From An integrated view of precambrian eumetazoan evolution (2009) · cites this paper as Douzery et al. (2004)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The suggestion that fungi diverged from animals ca 1000 Myr ago (Knoll 1992; Douzery et al. 2004) was confirmed by all our analyses that did not assume a particular age for the root node.”
From The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records (2008) · cites this paper as Douzery et al. 2004
In the citing paper
“We see from Figure 2b that the cnidarian-bilaterian split lies ~30% of the way between these two nodes (adopting the midpoint rooting as shown), suggesting that the eumetazoan ancestor lived between 670 and 820 Mya.”
From Sea Anemone Genome Reveals Ancestral Eumetazoan Gene Repertoire and Genomic Organization (2007) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Rambaut, A., & Grass, N. C. (1997) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235 · Cited by 1,545
The origin and early evolution of plants on land
Kenrick, P., & Crane, P. R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37918 · Cited by 1,466
Bryson, V., & Vogel, H. J. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.147.3653.68 · Cited by 1,343
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317
Archean Molecular Fossils and the Early Rise of Eukaryotes
Brocks, J. J., Logan, G. A., Buick, R., & Summons, R. E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1033 · Cited by 1,275
Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?
Anbar, A. D., & Knoll, A. H. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069651 · Cited by 1,191
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156
Molecular Evidence for the Early Colonization of Land by Fungi and Plants
Heckman, D. S., Geiser, D. M., Eidell, B. R., Stauffer, R. L., Kardos, N. L., & Hedges, S. B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061457 · Cited by 1,020
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026 · DOI
- Philippe, H., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Lopez, P., Holland, P. W. H. & Casane, D. (2004) Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 1740-1752.
- Philippe, H., Lopez, P., Brinkmann, H., Budin, K., Germot, A., Laurent, J., Moreira, D., Müller, M. & Le Guyader, H. (2000) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 267, 1213-1221.
- Grassly, N. C., Adachi, J. & Rambaut, A. (1997) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 559-560.9367131
- Shields, R. (2004) Trends Genet. 20, 221-222.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sea Anemone Genome Reveals Ancestral Eumetazoan Gene Repertoire and Genomic Organization
Putnam, N. H., Srivastava, M., Hellsten, U., Dirks, B., Chapman, J., Salamov, A., Terry, A., Shapiro, H., Lindquist, E., Kapitonov, V. V., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139158 · Cited by 1,555
PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating
Lartillot, N., Lepage, T., & Blanquart, S. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368 · Cited by 1,297
Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution
Keeling, P. J., & Palmer, J. D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2386 · Cited by 1,355
“Only 20 of these genes were common to all three trypanosomes, whereas 6 genes were found in only two of the three, and 21 were unique to a single genome, indicating considerable variability in gain and/or loss of bacterial genes within the estimated 250 million year divergenc”
BackgroundGene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans
Davidson, E. H., & Erwin, D. H. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113832 · Cited by 1,207
Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks
Parfrey, L. W., Lahr, D. J. G., Knoll, A. H., & Katz, L. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110633108 · Cited by 899
Phylogeny and Molecular Evolution of the Green Algae
Leliaert, F., Smith, D. R., Moreau, H., Herron, M. D., Verbruggen, H., Delwiche, C. F., & Clerck, O. D. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.615705 · Cited by 948
“The fossil record indicates the presence of the classes in the mid-Neoproterozoic and molecular clock estimates situate the UTC divergence in the early Neoproterozoic (Butterfield et al., 1994; Douzery et al., 2004; Herron et al., 2009).”
BackgroundComparative Genomics of Trypanosomatid Parasitic Protozoa
El-Sayed, N. M., Myler, P. J., Blandin, G., Berriman, M., Crabtree, J., Aggarwal, G., Caler, E. V., Renauld, H., Worthey, E. A., Hertz‐Fowler, C., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112181 · Cited by 832
Hohmann-Marriott, M. F., & Blankenship, R. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103811 · Cited by 744
“F or p er so na l u se o nl y. 10 20 Cyanobacteria Purple bacteria Green sulfur bacteria Photosynthetic eukaryotes Land-based eukaryotes Vascular plants Isotope evidence Fossil evidence Signature molecule evidence Earliest rock (IS) Earliest autotrophic life O xyg en co n cen tratio n (% )I ro n d ep o si ti o n h ei…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Ediacara biota: Neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems
Narbonne, G. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122519 · Cited by 714
“The best molecular clock estimates for the last common ancestor of the bilaterians vary by a factor of two, from ca. 1200 Ma to ca. 600 Ma, with most recent estimates focusing on the younger end of this spectrum (Peterson et al. 2004, Douzery et al. 2004).”
BackgroundEukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans
Knoll, A. H., Javaux, E. J., Hewitt, D., & Cohen, P. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1843 · Cited by 701
“…2002a), but molecular clock estimates commonly suggest an earlier Proterozoic origin and later Proterozoic diversification of the clade (Doolittle et al. 1996; Douzery et al. 2004; tribution of 14 to a Discussion Meeting Issue ‘Major steps in ution’. r for correspondence (aknoll@oeb.harvard.edu).”
BackgroundPhylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence?
JEFFROY, O., BRINKMANN, H., DELSUC, F., & PHILIPPE, H. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.003 · Cited by 698
“[1] ,a nd alternatively by probabilistic methods – Bayesian inference (BI) [8] or maximum likelihood (ML) [9–11] – because these methods are generally considered the most accurate [12,13] .I n addition, because the diversification of these yeasts is ancient (O250 Mya [ 14 ]) and amino acid sequences evolve more slowly…”
MethodSelf-citationSchnittger, L., Rodríguez, A. E., Florin‐Christensen, M., & Morrison, D. A. (2012) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.004 · Cited by 629
A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models
Lepage, T., Bryant, D., Philippe, H., & Lartillot, N. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm193 · Cited by 546
Self-citationKeeling, P. J., Burger, G., Durnford, D. G., Lang, B. F., Lee, R. W., Pearlman, R. E., Roger, A. J., & Gray, M. W. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 · Cited by 579
“aimed at dating the earliest divergences in the tree of eukaryotes using fossil-calibrated ‘molecular dating’ methods [77, 78 ].”
MethodInfluentialMonophyly of Primary Photosynthetic Eukaryotes: Green Plants, Red Algae, and Glaucophytes
Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta, N., Brinkmann, H., Burey, S. C., Roure, B., Burger, G., Löffelhardt, W., Bohnert, H. J., Philippe, H., & Lang, B. F. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.040 · Cited by 559
“5 billion years ago [1, 2], eukaryotic organisms acquired the ability to convert light into chemical energy through endosymbiosis with a Cyanobacterium (e.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPhilippe, H., Lartillot, N., & Brinkmann, H. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi111 · Cited by 551
“However, this generally implies allowing for missing or partial sequences of some genes from some species (e.g., the amount of missing data is of 12.5% [Murphy et al. 2001], 20% [Qiu et al. 1999], or 25% [Douzery et al. 2004]).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRAG1 Core and V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences Were Derived from Transib Transposons
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030181 · Cited by 521
“The basic timescale of the evolutionary tree is based on published literature [49–51].”
MethodThe Origin and Establishment of the Plastid in Algae and Plants
Reyes-Prieto, A., Weber, A. P. M., & Bhattacharya, D. (2007) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130134 · Cited by 453
“Although still controversial (23), recent analyses suggest that the primary plastid was established ca.”
BackgroundFreeling, M., & Thomas, B. C. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3681406 · Cited by 463
Molecular Phylogeny and Divergence Times of Deuterostome Animals
Blair, J. E., & Hedges, S. B. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi225 · Cited by 451
“Some studies have produced considerably younger divergence times among deuterostomes (Aris-Brosou and Yang 2002, 2003; Douzery et al. 2004) but suffer from methodological biases, causing their results to conflict with other well-supported aspects of the eukaryote fossil record (Blair and Hedges…”
Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity
Kachroo, A. H., Laurent, J. M., Yellman, C. M., Meyer, A. G., Wilke, C. O., & Marcotte, E. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa0769 · Cited by 447
Domazet‐Lošo, T., Brajković, J., & Tautz, D. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.08.014 · Cited by 421
Dating divergences in the Fungal Tree of Life: review and new analyses
Taylor, J. W., & Berbee, M. L. (2006) · Mycologia · doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.838 · Cited by 430
“…(Blagoderov et al 2002, Peterson et al 2004) and a maximum of 417 000 000 y, the age of the first primitive hexapod fossils (Gaunt and Miles 2002, Douzery et al 2004); and the divergence of eudicots within the angiosperms, with a minimum age of 144 000 000 and maximum of 206 000 000 y (Sanderson…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGenomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major East Asian noctuid pest
Cheng, T., Wu, J., Wu, Y., Chilukuri, R. V. E., Huang, L., Yamamoto, K., Feng, L., Li, W., Chen, Z., Guo, H., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0314-4 · Cited by 412
Paleobiological Perspectives on Early Eukaryotic Evolution
Knoll, A. H. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016121 · Cited by 394
“…with some positing a long interval of eukaryotic evolution before Neoproterozoic radiation (e.g., Yoon et al. 2004; Hedges et al. 2004; Parfrey et al 2011), while others suggest a shorter fuse (e.g., Douzery et al. 2004, Berney and Pawlowski 2006; Chernikova et al. 2011; Shih and Matzke 2013).”
BackgroundUnexpected complexity of the Aquaporin gene family in the moss Physcomitrella patens
Danielson, J. Å., & Johanson, U. (2008) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-45 · Cited by 409
“patens is a moss (bryophyte) and as such diverged from the lineage leading to higher plants approximately 443– 490 million years ago, before the evolution of vascular plants [34].”
Animal Evolution and the Molecular Signature of Radiations Compressed in Time
Rokas, A., Krüger, D., & Carroll, S. B. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116759 · Cited by 374
Peterson, K. J., & Butterfield, N. J. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503660102 · Cited by 361
The origin and evolution of mycorrhizal symbioses: from palaeomycology to phylogenomics
Strullu‐Derrien, C., Selosse, M., Kenrick, P., & Martin, F. M. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15076 · Cited by 355
Identification of the Maturation Factor for Dual Oxidase
Grasberger, H., & Refetoff, S. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c600095200 · Cited by 340
Couvreur, T. L. P., Franzke, A., Al-Shehbaz, I. A., Bakker, F. T., Koch, М. A., & Mummenhoff, K. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp202 · Cited by 333
Nowack, E. C. M., Melkonian, M., & Glöckner, G. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.051 · Cited by 329
“Yet the reasons for the apparent singularity of plastid acquisition through endosymbiosis, which is thought to have taken place more than a billion years ago [6], have remained enigmatic.”
BackgroundMarcet‐Houben, M., & Gabaldón, T. (2015) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002220 · Cited by 334
“[65]) was used as calibration point.”
Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key?
Wodniok, S., Brinkmann, H., Glöckner, G., Heidel, A. J., Philippe, H., Melkonian, M., & Becker, B. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-104 · Cited by 333
“Streptophyte algae and embryophytes together constitute the division Streptophyta, which likely split from the Chlorophyta (all other green algae) about 725-1200 MY ago [10-12].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEarly photosynthetic eukaryotes inhabited low-salinity habitats
Sánchez‐Baracaldo, P., Raven, J. A., Pisani, D., & Knoll, A. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620089114 · Cited by 332
“9 Bya (56); others based on the α and β subunits of ATP synthase and the elongation factor thermo unstable (45, 67) propose ∼1.”
BackgroundPeterson, K. J., Cotton, J. A., Gehling, J. G., & Pisani, D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2233 · Cited by 313
Estimating the Phanerozoic history of the Ascomycota lineages: Combining fossil and molecular data
Beimforde, C., Feldberg, K., Nylinder, S., Rikkinen, J. K., Tuovila, H., Dörfelt, H., Gube, M., Jackson, D. J., Joachim Reitner, A., Seyfullah, L. J., et al. (2014) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.024 · Cited by 311
“…a metacapnodiaceous fossil and Palaeocurvularia for the split of Dothideomycetes and Arthoniomycetes, together with several non-ascomycotan (Taylor et al., 1994; Redecker et al., 2000; Hibbett et al., 1995, 1997), and non-fungal (Crane et al., 1995; Douzery et al., 2004) calibration constraints.”
BackgroundThe Origins of Multicellularity and the Early History of the Genetic Toolkit For Animal Development
Rokas, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091513 · Cited by 312
“75 bya (82, 97), a date strikingly contemporaneous with the emergence of the first ancestors of fungi and animals (30, 82).”
BackgroundThe evolution, metabolism and functions of the apicoplast
Lim, L., & McFadden, G. I. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0273 · Cited by 356
“There are no fossil records for apicomplexa but molecular dating estimates the apicomplexan protists to have evolved between 600–800 Ma ago (Douzery et al. 2004) and there are fossils of the sister group dinoflagellates that are in excess of 400 million years old.”
BackgroundHauser, F., Cazzamali, G., Williamson, M. P., Blenau, W., & Grimmelikhuijzen, C. J. P. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.07.005 · Cited by 302
“3), these ‘‘ligand-hops’’ have occurred before the split of the ancestors of the present-day flies (Diptera) and honey bees (Hymenoptera), which is about 350 million years ago (Douzery et al., 2004).”
BackgroundSimionato, E., Ledent, V., Richards, G. S., Thomas‐Chollier, M., Kerner, P., Coornaert, D., Degnan, B. M., & Vervoort, M. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-33 · Cited by 292
“Since this ancestor which is estimated to have lived some 600–700 millions years ago [24,25], the bHLH complement in bilaterians is remarkably stable.”
BackgroundOn the Age of Eukaryotes: Evaluating Evidence from Fossils and Molecular Clocks
Eme, L., Sharpe, S. C., Brown, M. W., & Roger, A. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016139 · Cited by 287
“Douzery et al. (2004) estimated the age of LECA and other major groups using a Bayesian RMC approach calibrated with, for the first time, six paleontological constraints from the Phanerozoic.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDating the molecular clock in fungi – how close are we?
Berbee, M. L., & Taylor, J. W. (2010) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 285
“If, however, it could be considered a Pezizomycotina, it would push the divergence of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota back to 843 Ma, and if it were considered a Sordariomycete, back to 1.489 Ba (Taylor and Berbee, 2006) (Fig.”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Empirical Assessment of Long-Branch Attraction Artefacts in Deep Eukaryotic Phylogenomics
Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M., Zhou, Y., de Raucourt, G. P., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500234609 · Cited by 286
Self-citationBengtson, S., Sallstedt, T., Belivanova, V., & Whitehouse, M. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000735 · Cited by 284
Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution
Cavalier‐Smith, T. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1842 · Cited by 282
“…of the eukaryote tree and strong evidence that extant anaerobic eukaryotes probably all have organelles (hydrogenosomes or mitosomes) evolutionarily derived from aerobic mitochondria (Embley 2006) is that the last common ancestor of all eukaryotes was an aerobic amoeboflagellate with mitochondria.”
BackgroundThe origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal
Duve, C. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2071 · Cited by 273
Gene family innovation, conservation and loss on the animal stem lineage
(2018) · doi:10.7554/elife.34226 · Cited by 226
The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration
Zhang, X., Sun, L., Yuan, J., Sun, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, L., Li, S., Dai, H., Hamel, J., Liu, C., et al. (2017) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003790 · Cited by 267
Waters, M. T., & Langdale, J. A. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.264 · Cited by 261
“EMBO openEMBO Member‘s Review”
BackgroundInfluentialDistinct Dynamics of HISTONE3 Variants between the Two Fertilization Products in Plants
Ingouff, M., Hamamura, Y., Gourgues, M., Higashiyama, T., & Berger, F. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.019 · Cited by 258
The Evolution of Invertebrate Gene Body Methylation
Sarda, S., Zeng, J., Hunt, B. G., & Yi, S. V. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss062 · Cited by 258
The Geological Succession of Primary Producers in the Oceans
KNOLL, A. H., SUMMONS, R. E., WALDBAUER, J. R., & ZUMBERGE, J. E. (2007) · Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea · doi:10.1016/b978-012370518-1/50009-6 · Cited by 249
“On the other hand, some molecular clock analyses suggest divergence times for the plastids in photosynthetic chromoalveolates well back into the Proterozoic (Douzery et al. 2004; Yoon et al. 2004).”
BackgroundDeciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives
Swalla, B. J., & Smith, A. B. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2246 · Cited by 253
“2005) and other analyses that apply potentially more appropriate models (Douzery et al. 2004) have continued to find somewhat deeper divergence dates for the Bilateria.”
Hsu, A. P., Johnson, K. D., Falcone, E. L., Sanalkumar, R., Sanchez, L. A., Hickstein, D. D., Cuellar‐Rodríguez, J., Lemieux, J. E., Zerbe, C. S., Bresnick, E. H., et al. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-08-452763 · Cited by 251
Initial Diversification of Living Amphibians Predated the Breakup of Pangaea
Mauro, D. S., Vences, M., Alcobendas, M., Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A. (2005) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/429523 · Cited by 255
“Limited taxon sampling or calibration points can seriously affect molecular dating estimates (Douzery et al. 2004).”
Relaxed molecular clocks for dating historical plant dispersal events
Renner, S. S. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.010 · Cited by 241
Modern proteomes contain putative imprints of ancient shifts in trace metal geochemistry
Dupont, C. L., Yang, S., Palenik, B., & Bourne, P. E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605798103 · Cited by 236
A genome-wide inventory of neurohormone GPCRs in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum
Hauser, F., Cazzamali, G., Williamson, M. P., Park, Y., Li, B., Tanaka, Y., Predel, R., Neupert, S., Schachtner, J., Verleyen, P., et al. (2007) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.10.003 · Cited by 239
Evolution and pathology in Chagas disease: a review
Teixeira, A. R., Nascimento, R. J., & Sturm, N. R. (2006) · Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · doi:10.1590/s0074-02762006000500001 · Cited by 237
“The constant accumulation of mutations affecting aminoacid change in proteins during evolution is thus accountable (Douzery et al. 2004).”
BackgroundPimanda, J. E., Ottersbach, K., Knezevic, K., Kinston, S., Chan, W. Y. I., Wilson, N. K., Landry, J.-R., Wood, A. D., Kolb-Kokocinski, A., Green, A. R., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707045104 · Cited by 228
Lücking, R., Huhndorf, S. M., Pfister, D. H., Plata, E. R., & Lumbsch, H. T. (2009) · Mycologia · doi:10.3852/09-016 · Cited by 232
“It was even suggested that it could fall outside the euascomycetes (Pezizomycotina), and possible links with the enigmatic taphrinomycete Neolecta (Landvik et al 2003) were discussed (Eriksson 2005, Taylor and Berbee 2006, Berbee and Taylor 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialRutschmann, F. (2005) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00210.x · Cited by 228
Molecular dating when rates vary
Welch, J. J., & Bromham, L. D. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.007 · Cited by 228
“The influence of the prior diminishes, however, with the amount of sequence data used [33,34, 42 ].”
MethodResultRooting the tree of life by transition analyses.
Cavalier‐Smith, T. (2006) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-19 · Cited by 224
“Roger and Hug [35] indeed reanalyzed those very data by a technically superior method estimating parameters for each gene separately, not concatenating them all; this yields an even younger date of ~900 My (not 1100 My as in [34]) for the eukaryote cenancestor – strictly speaking the divergence between Amoebozoa (the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEarly Diverging Fungi: Diversity and Impact at the Dawn of Terrestrial Life
Berbee, M. L., James, T. Y., & Strullu‐Derrien, C. (2017) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020324 · Cited by 232
“Somewhere between 1,481 and 900 Mya (26, 93) that common ancestor had a single flagellum that beat to propel it forward (92, 131).”
BackgroundEarly evolution of the Eukaryota
Butterfield, N. J. F. (2014) · Palaeontology · doi:10.1111/pala.12139 · Cited by 225
“…billion-year extrapolation error have precluded any consensus on the timing of LECA (Roger and Hug 2006; Eme et al. 2014): estimates range from less than 1200 Ma (Douzery et al. 2004; Berney and Pawlowski 2006; Chernikova et al. 2011; Shih and Matzke 2013) to more than 2300 Ma (Hedges et al. 2004).”
BackgroundThe Genomic and Cellular Foundations of Animal Origins
Richter, D. J., & King, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133456 · Cited by 196
Zhu, S., Zhu, M., Knoll, A. H., Yin, Z., Zhao, F., Sun, S., Qu, Y., Shi, M., & Liu, H. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11500 · Cited by 199
Marshall, C. P., Javaux, E., Knoll, A. H., & Walter, M. R. (2005) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2005.05.006 · Cited by 197
Szöllősi, G. J., Boussau, B., Abby, S. S., Tannier, É., & Daubin, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202997109 · Cited by 202
Evolutionary mysteries in meiosis
Lenormand, T., Engelstädter, J., Johnston, S. E., Wijnker, T. G., & Haag, C. R. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0001 · Cited by 188
“Meiosis is one of the ‘major innovations’ of eukaryotic life that evolved before their subsequent radiation over one billion years ago [3–5].”
Yang, Y., Yang, E., An, Z., & Liu, X. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702770104 · Cited by 192
Evolutionary conservation of early mesoderm specification by mechanotransduction in Bilateria
Brunet, T., Bouclet, A., Ahmadi, P., Mitrossilis, D., Driquez, B., Brunet, A., Henry, L., Serman, F., Béalle, G., Ménager, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3821 · Cited by 199
Michel, G., Tonon, T., Scornet, D., Cock, J. M., & Kloareg, B. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03345.x · Cited by 188
“…clock analyses calibrated by 5 paleontological constraints, Stramenopiles are thought to have diverged from other major 6 eukaryotic groups about 1 billion years ago and it is also thought that the secondary 7 endosymbiosis happened shortly after the primary endosymbiosis (Douzery et al., 2004).”
BackgroundDating the Diversification of the Major Lineages of Ascomycota (Fungi)
Prieto, M., & Wedin, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065576 · Cited by 189
“Most of the existing dating studies provide hypotheses on divergence times for major events in fungal evolution (e.g., the time for the origin of Fungi, Basidiomycota or Ascomycota), but not on the details of the radiation within a major group [26– 27,32,46–47].”
BackgroundDid an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?
Huang, J., & Gogarten, J. P. (2007) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r99 · Cited by 189
“Such an insect-to-plant transfer scenario would also push the emergence of insects to before the split of primary photosynthetic eukaryotes, which contradicts all available molecular and fossil evidence [47,48].”
Hayden, C. A., & Jorgensen, R. A. (2007) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-32 · Cited by 181
“netic relationships among these species [58], the most”
BackgroundGalewski, T., Mauffrey, J.-F., Leite, Y. L. R., Patton, J. L., & Douzery, E. (2005) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.015 · Cited by 182
“This approach has already permitted to highlight unsuspected biogeographical patterns within frogs (Bossuyt and Milinkovitch, 2001) and gave compatible results with the fossil record at various taxonomic levels (Douzery et al., 2004; Hassanin and Douzery, 2003).”
ResultSelf-citationChang, Y., Wang, S., Sekimoto, S., Aerts, A. L., Choi, C., Clum, A., LaButti, K. M., Lindquist, E. A., Ngan, C. Y., Ohm, R. A., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evv090 · Cited by 185
Cloning and identification of an oxytocin/vasopressin-like receptor and its ligand from insects
Stafflinger, E., Hansen, K. K., Hauser, F., Schneider, M., Cazzamali, G., Williamson, M. P., & Grimmelikhuijzen, C. J. P. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710897105 · Cited by 180
“A comparison with the mouse vasopressin and oxytocin and the Lymnaea stagnalis (mollusk) conopressin preprohormones shows that these proteins have conserved their structural organizations since the split of Proto- and Deuterostomia, 700 million years ago (18).”
BackgroundRoger, A. J., & Hug, L. A. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1845 · Cited by 180
“However, currently neither phylogenetics, discussed below, nor comparisons of cellular and genomic properties across eukaryotic diversity (see Embley 2006, this volume) provide compelling evidence for an early-branching status of these or any other eukaryote lineages.”
BackgroundHibbett, D. S., & Matheny, P. B. (2009) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-13 · Cited by 191
“Three other molecular clock studies that analyzed datasets with 37 to 129 genes have estimated the Dikarya to be 727 to 1208 million years old [16-18].”
Nordström, K. J. V., Almén, M. S., Edstam, M. M., Fredriksson, R., & Schiöth, H. B. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr061 · Cited by 184
Ancient signals: comparative genomics of green plant CDPKs
Hamel, L., Sheen, J., & Séguin, A. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.009 · Cited by 177
Hibbett, D. S., Bauer, R., Binder, M., Giachini, A. J., Hosaka, K., Justo, A., Larsson, E., Larsson, K., Lawrey, J. D., Miettinen, O., et al. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9_14 · Cited by 176
A “Holistic” Kinesin Phylogeny Reveals New Kinesin Families and Predicts Protein Functions
Wickstead, B., & Gull, K. (2006) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1090 · Cited by 175
“with the most closely related believed to be the 2 kinetoplastids, T. brucei and L. major, which diverged ~250 Mya ( Douzery et al., 2004 ).”
BackgroundRice, D. W., & Palmer, J. D. (2006) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-4-31 · Cited by 19
“This rpl36 transfer and the rbcLS transfer described years ago [16] and revisited above share several features: (i) they both involve bacterial donors; (ii) they are both relatively ancient [56-58], having occurred in the common ancestor of red algae (rbcLS), perhaps 1.”
Philip, G. K., Creevey, C. J., & McInerney, J. O. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi102 · Cited by 169
Metabolic evolution and the self-organization of ecosystems
Braakman, R., Follows, M. J., & Chisholm, S. W. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619573114 · Cited by 165
Network dynamics of eukaryotic LTR retroelements beyond phylogenetic trees
Lloréns, C., Fuentes, A. M.-P., Bernad, L., Botella, H., & Moyá, A. (2009) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-41 · Cited by 161
“In view of the emergence of winged insects (380-325 Mya [70]), these LTR retroelements most probably emerged simultaneously with those of Retroviridae classes 2 and 3 in amniotes (again consistent with the three kings hypothesis).”
BackgroundInfluentialA molecular time-scale for eukaryote evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record
Berney, C., & Pawlowski, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3537 · Cited by 212
“In spite of recent criticisms (Blair & Hedges 2005), the maximum age limits used by Douzery et al. (2004) were apparently not too constraining, as the dates inferred in our time-scale are largely congruent with their estimations.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSong, X., Huang, Z., Duan, W., Ren, J., Liu, T., Li, Y., & Hou, X. (2013) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-013-0791-3 · Cited by 162
Diversity and evolution of marine phytoplankton
Simon, N., Cras, A.-L., Foulon, E., & Rodolphe Lemée, B. (2008) · Comptes Rendus Biologies · doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2008.09.009 · Cited by 162
“A secondary endosymbiosis event (0.8–1.2 Gy, [21,22]) with a primitive red algae gave rise to the cryptophytes, haptophytes, photosynthetic stramenopiles (or heterokontophytes) and peridinin-containing dinoflagellates.”
BackgroundInfluentialAmphioxus and tunicates as evolutionary model systems
Schubert, M., Escrivá, H., Xavier‐Neto, J., & Laudet, V. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.009 · Cited by 161
Symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution
López-García, P., Eme, L., & Moreira, D. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.031 · Cited by 154
Evolution of centralized nervous systems: Two schools of evolutionary thought
Northcutt, R. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201889109 · Cited by 141
Ancient collagen reveals evolutionary history of the endemic South American ‘ungulates’
Buckley, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2671 · Cited by 120
A soft-bodied mollusc with radula from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale
Caron, J., Scheltema, A. H., Schänder, C., & Rudkin, D. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04894 · Cited by 152
Wever, A. D., Leliaert, F., Verleyen, E., Vanormelingen, P., der Gucht, K. V., Hodgson, D. A., Sabbe, K., & Vyverman, W. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0994 · Cited by 151
“Owing to the lack of reliable green algal fossils, our phylogenetic tree is only calibrated at a single node, using a minimum and maximum age of the Chlorophyta– Streptophyta split at 700 and 1500 Ma, respectively (Douzery et al. 2004; Hedges et al. 2004; Yoon et al. 2004; Berney & Pawlowski 2006; Cavalier-Smith 2006;…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Douzery, E. J. P., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F., & Philippe, H.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-10-19
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 15386-15391
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC524432
- OpenAlex
- W2059383371
- Semantic Scholar
- 6a68deca477b58d5dc602813227badc0c34c5b9f
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- eukaryotic evolution, divergence time estimation, relaxed molecular clock, protein sequences, fossil calibration, choanoflagellates, protists, animals, fungi, plants
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review