The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mammalian monogamy is not controlled by a single gene
Open accessAbstract
Complex social behavior in Microtus voles and other mammals has been postulated to be under the direct genetic control of a single locus: the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor (avpr1a) gene. Using a phylogenetic approach, we show that a repetitive element in the promoter region of avpr1a, which reportedly causes social monogamy, is actually widespread in nonmonogamous Microtus and other rodents. There was no evidence for intraspecific polymorphism in regard to the presence or absence of the repetitive element. Among 25 rodent species studied, the element was absent in only two closely related nonmonogamous species, indicating that this absence is certainly the result of an evolutionarily recent loss. Our analyses further demonstrate that the repetitive structures upstream of the avpr1a gene in humans and primates, which have been associated with social bonding, are evolutionarily distinct from those in rodents. Our evolutionary approach reveals that monogamy in rodents is not controlled by a single polymorphism in the promoter region of the avpr1a gene. We thus resolve the contradiction between the claims for an evolutionarily conserved genetic programming of social behavior in mammals and the vast evidence for highly complex and flexible mating systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it is now known that length per se does not predict social organization of other Microtus species [29, 32], and sequence variation within the microsatellite may have a greater influence on expression than length itself [3].”
From The prairie vole: An emerging model organism for understanding the social brain (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,959
Thompson, J. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 · Cited by 38,685
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,156
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I. B., & Nei, M. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244 · Cited by 6,046
Grau, J. M. G., & Sáiz‐Jiménez, C. (2002) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00362.x · Cited by 1,707
The neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523
Kleiman, D. G. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409721 · Cited by 1,436
Inferring Coalescence Times From DNA Sequence Data
Tavaré, S., Balding, D. J., Griffiths, R., & Donnelly, P. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/145.2.505 · Cited by 941
Lim, M. M., Wang, Z., Olazábal, D. E., Ren, X., Terwilliger, E. F., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02539 · Cited by 628
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- T. A. Hall Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95–98 (1999).
- N. Saitou, M. Nei Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158668 · Cited by 1,645
Robinson, G. E., Fernald, R. D., & Clayton, D. F. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159277 · Cited by 595
Vasopressin: Behavioral roles of an “original” neuropeptide
Caldwell, H. K., Lee, H.-J., Macbeth, A. H., & Young, W. S. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.10.007 · Cited by 504
The prairie vole: An emerging model organism for understanding the social brain
McGraw, L. A., & Young, L. J. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.006 · Cited by 276
The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates
Fernandez-Duque, E., Valeggia, C. R., & Mendoza, S. P. (2009) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164334 · Cited by 232
Experimental EvolutionConcepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments
Garland, T., & Rose, M. R. (2009) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/california/9780520247666.001.0001 · Cited by 221
Deconstructing sociality, social evolution and relevant nonapeptide functions
Goodson, J. L. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.005 · Cited by 206
“However, the monogamous pine and prairie voles are much more closely related to each other than they are to the nonmonogamous montane and meadow voles (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAlbers, H. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.07.001 · Cited by 200
“non-monogamous species (Fink et al., 2006; Turner et al., 2010) (Fig.”
BackgroundYoung, K. A., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2008) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.02.004 · Cited by 163
The vasopressin system — From antidiuresis to psychopathology
Frank, E., & Landgraf, R. (2008) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.063 · Cited by 162
“However, a recent study questioned the hypothesis of the polymorphisms in the V1A receptor gene as critical in the evolution from poly- to monogamy in this species relying on only one gene (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSocial Mating System and Sex-Biased Dispersal in Mammals and Birds: A Phylogenetic Analysis
Mabry, K. E., Shelley, E. L., Davis, K. E., Blumstein, D. T., & Vuren, D. H. V. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057980 · Cited by 150
“townsendii, which is not represented in a recent Microtus phylogeny [27].”
BackgroundAnholt, R. R. H., & Mackay, T. F. C. (2012) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155514 · Cited by 139
“However, this correlation does not hold up across the vole phylogeny (44).”
BackgroundSocial but not genetic monogamy is associated with greater breeding success in prairie voles
Ophir, A. G., Phelps, S. M., Sorin, A. B., & Wolff, J. O. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.022 · Cited by 132
“A more systematic documentation of species differences in behaviour and neurobiology promise a more complete understanding of social attachment and its variations (e.g. Insel & Shapiro 1992; Bester-Meredith et al. 1999; Insel & Young 2001; Ribble 2003; Fink et al. 2006).”
The Neurobiology of Social Affiliation and Pair Bonding
Carter, C. S., & Keverne, E. B. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008088783-8.00004-8 · Cited by 130
Simple sequence repeats: genetic modulators of brain function and behavior
Fondon, J. W., Hammock, E. A. D., Hannan, A. J., & King, D. G. (2008) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.03.006 · Cited by 132
Monogamy Evolves through Multiple Mechanisms: Evidence from V1aR in Deer Mice
Turner, L. M., Young, A. R., Römpler, H., Schöneberg, T., Phelps, S. M., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq013 · Cited by 125
“1999) was not consistent among a larger sample of Microtus species (Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundResultNeuropeptide regulation of social behavior in a monogamous cichlid fish
Oldfield, R. G., & Hofmann, H. A. (2010) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.022 · Cited by 120
“Such changes in mating system have been proposed to occur as a result of a change in the gene for the V1a receptor, but it is likely that other mechanisms or an interaction of pathways are involved in the formation of the pair-bond [52,53].”
Backgroundκ-Opioid Receptors within the Nucleus Accumbens Shell Mediate Pair Bond Maintenance
Resendez, S. L., Kuhnmuench, M., Krzywosinski, T., & Aragona, B. J. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5779-11.2012 · Cited by 110
“, 1993; Solomon and Jacquot, 2002), and the biological basis of this variation continues to be studied (Fink et al., 2006; Young and Hammock, 2007; Ophir et al., 2008; Mabry et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPrimate paternal care: Interactions between biology and social experience
Storey, A. E., & Ziegler, T. E. (2015) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.07.024 · Cited by 111
“While this role is well established in rodents (Parker & Lee, 2001; Bales et al., 2004), it appears that the AVPR1a is not homologous between rodents and great apes (Fink et al., 2006) and it is not known whether it is homologous across primates.”
BackgroundBarrett, C. E., Keebaugh, A. C., Ahern, T. H., Bass, C. E., Terwilliger, E. F., & Young, L. J. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.01.005 · Cited by 100
“However, the exact contributions of the microsatellite to both inter and intra-specific regional V1aR expression and behavior remain controversial (Fink et al., 2006; Hammock and Young, 2005; Hammock et al., 2005; Ophir et al., 2008a, Young and Hammock, 2007).”
Fine‐scale genetic structure and dispersal in the common vole ( Microtus arvalis )
Schweizer, M., Excoffier, L., & Heckel, G. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03284.x · Cited by 101
Extensive Host Sharing of Central European Tula Virus
Schmidt‐Chanasit, J., Essbauer, S. S., Petraitytė-Burneikienė, R., Yoshimatsu, K., Tackmann, K., Conraths, F. J., Sasnauskas, K., Arikawa, J., Thomas, A., Pfeffer, M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01226-09 · Cited by 89
GENETIC REGULATION OF COLONY SOCIAL ORGANIZATION IN FIRE ANTS: AN INTEGRATIVE OVERVIEW
Gotzek, D., & Ross, K. G. (2007) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/519965 · Cited by 90
“Even so, an apparent precedent of such a major effect of variation at a single gene on complex social behavior has been reported in voles (e.g., Lim et al. 2004, 2005; but see Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundEstrogen receptors in the medial amygdala inhibit the expression of male prosocial behavior
Cushing, B. S., Perry, A., Musatov, S., Ogawa, S., & Papademetriou, E. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1928-08.2008 · Cited by 95
“…length of this microsatellite is the key element in prosocial behavior has recently been challenged with the finding that many other species in the genus Microtus that do not express high levels of social behavior also display significant variation in V1aR microsatellite length (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAntisocial oxytocin: Complex effects on social behavior
Beery, A. K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.11.006 · Cited by 74
Beating the boojum: Comparative approaches to the neurobiology of social behavior
Phelps, S. M., Polly Campbell, A., Zheng, D., & Ophir, A. G. (2009) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.06.043 · Cited by 73
“Evolutionary analyses that examined the distribution of avpr1a microsatellites across species provided valuable context for interpreting the complex, seemingly contradictory data provided in different association studies (Donaldson et al., 2008; Fink et al., 2006; Rosso et al., 2008).”
Solomon, N. G., Richmond, A. R., Harding, P. A., FRIES, A., Jacquemin, S., Schaefer, R. L., Lucia, K. E., & Keane, B. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04361.x · Cited by 70
“…important factor contributing to the inter- and 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd intraspecific differences in social attachment to a mate observed in males within this genus (Insel et al. 1994; Pitkow et al. 2001; Young et al. 1999; Phelps & Young 2003; Hammock & Young 2005; but see Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundOxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Gene Polymorphisms: Role in Social and Psychiatric Traits
Aspé-Sánchez, M., Moreno, M., Rivera, M. I., Rossi, A., & Ewer, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00510 · Cited by 71
“The early approaches that shed light on the genetic influences on human social behavior, namely the linkage/association studies and the quantitative traits loci (QTL) approach, are described below.”
BackgroundFink, S., Fischer, M. C., Excoffier, L., & Heckel, G. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq042 · Cited by 67
“We also obtained molecular data from an individual of Arvicola terrestris to use as outgroup—this species belongs to a sister genus of Microtus, with 18% sequence divergence for cytb (Fink et al. 2006; Galewski et al. 2006).”
MethodBraaker, S., & Heckel, G. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04189.x · Cited by 65
“The analyses were performed analogous to Fink et al. (2004, 2006, 2007).”
MethodDynamic mutations as digital genetic modulators of brain development, function and dysfunction
Nithianantharajah, J., & Hannan, A. J. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20589 · Cited by 65
“While this study provides some insight into the potential contributing factors in the evolution of different levels of social behaviour, a caveat is that complex behavioural phenotypes such as monogamy versus polygamy,((39)) clearly involve more than a single gene.”
BackgroundHomoplasy, homology, and the perceived special status of behavior in evolution
Drew Rendall, A., & Fiore, A. D. (2007) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.014 · Cited by 63
“Species differences in the distribution of avpr1a receptors within the brain have also been associated with social monogamy versus polygyny in closely related voles (Insel et al., 1994; but see Fink et al., 2006 ).”
BackgroundUlrich, R. G., Schmidt‐Chanasit, J., Schlegel, M., Jacob, J., Pelz, H. J., Mertens, M., Wenk, M., Büchner, T., Masur, D., Sevke, K., et al. (2008) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1054-9 · Cited by 61
“It is currently unclear whether deeper phylogenetic divergence within rodent species (Fink et al. 2004, 2006) is also related to similar divergence of the pathogens they carry.”
BackgroundDonaldson, Z. R., Kondrashov, F. A., Putnam, A. S., Bai, Y., Stoinski, T., Hammock, E. A. D., & Young, L. J. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-180 · Cited by 62
“Similar to our findings in primates, a recent study investigating the evolution of the vole avpr1a upstream repeat region in 21 species revealed that the presence or absence of this DNA element was not sufficient to predict social organization [26].”
ResultMabry, K. E., Streatfeild, C. A., Keane, B., & Solomon, N. G. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.021 · Cited by 60
Nonapeptides and the Evolution of Social Group Sizes in Birds
Goodson, J. L., & Kingsbury, M. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2011.00013 · Cited by 59
“What we do not yet know is whether neural mechanisms have evolved convergently in other monogamous or alloparental species, although this is a matter of substantial current interest (Fink et al., 2006; Goodson and Thompson, 2010; Turner et al., 2010).”
On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy
Young, L. J., & Hammock, E. A. D. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.010 · Cited by 58
First evidence for heritable variation in cooperative breeding behaviour
Charmantier, A., Keyser, A. J., & Promislow, D. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0012 · Cited by 56
“2005), although recent findings highlight a more complex genetic control than initially suggested (Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundA Neuroscientist’s Guide to the Vole
Kenkel, W. M., Gustison, M. L., & Beery, A. K. (2021) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.175 · Cited by 52
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003729 · Cited by 52
“However, a subsequent survey of the Avpr1a locus in several other vole species and, more recently, in Peromyscus species did not support the hypothesis that the presence or absence of the microsatellite element was associated with monogamy [64,69].”
BackgroundBeyond “oxytocin = good”: neural complexities and the flipside of social bonds
van Anders, S. M., Goodson, J. L., & Kingsbury, M. A. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0134-9 · Cited by 52
Stress in groups: Lessons from non-traditional rodent species and housing models
Beery, A. K., Holmes, M. M., Lee, W., & Curley, J. P. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.033 · Cited by 55
“pine voles and Taiwan voles), as well as contrasts to promiscuous species, have contributed to our understanding of how monogamy is supported within a taxon (Fink et al., 2006; Gersten, 2008; Young, 1999).”
BackgroundHigh variability and non-neutral evolution of the mammalian avpr1a gene
Fink, S., Excoffier, L., & Heckel, G. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-176 · Cited by 46
“ochrogaster, [18,57-59]) identical AA alterations or protein types among each other that could potentially be associated with behavioural patterns.”
BackgroundWilley, A. (2016) · Signs · doi:10.1086/684238 · Cited by 44
“Here, the behavioral diversity that has been noted by critics but largely ignored in the laboratory’s research is explicitly named, so too is the complexity of that diversity ðFink, Excoffier, and Heckel 2006; Willey and Giordano 2011Þ.”
BackgroundComparative and developmental perspectives on oxytocin and vasopressin.
Bales, K. L. (2013) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14250-002 · Cited by 40
Hostetler, C. M., Hinde, K., Maninger, N., Mendoza, S. P., Mason, W. A., Rowland, D. J., Wang, G. B., Kukis, D. L., Cherry, S. R., & Bales, K. L. (2016) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22612 · Cited by 40
Deep mitochondrial introgression and hybridization among ecologically divergent vole species
Bastos‐Silveira, C., Santos, S., Monarca, R. I., Mathias, M. D. L., & Heckel, G. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12018 · Cited by 40
“The mating systems of the two taxa have not been studied in detail but limited data indicated social monogamy for M. duodecimcostatus (Paradis & Guédon 1993; Santos et al. 2010b) while Microtus species like most mammals are generally rather promiscuous or polygynous (Fink et al. 2006, 2007).”
Mating system and avpr1a promoter variation in primates
Rosso, L., Keller, L., Kaessmann, H., & Hammond, R. L. (2008) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0122 · Cited by 36
Beyond Neuroanatomy: Novel Approaches to Studying Brain Evolution
Pollen, A. A., & Hofmann, H. A. (2008) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000151474 · Cited by 34
“However, it should be noted that the presence or absence of this expanded microsatellite repeat does not correlate with the mating systems in other Microtus vole species [Fink et al., 2006].”
BackgroundPair bonds and parental behaviour
McGraw, L. A., Székely, T., & Young, L. J. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781360.023 · Cited by 37
Tecot, S. R., & Baden, A. L. (2015) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0263 · Cited by 36
Systematics of snow voles (Chionomys, Arvicolinae) revisited.
Yannic, G., Burri, R., Malikov, V., & Vogel, P. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.004 · Cited by 34
Chimpanzee Personality and the Arginine Vasopressin Receptor 1A Genotype
Wilson, V. A. D., Weiss, A., Humle, T., Morimura, N., Udono, T., Idani, G., Matsuzawa, T., Hirata, S., & Inoue‐Murayama, M. (2016) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-016-9822-2 · Cited by 37
“However, further analyses of AVPR1a across 21 Microtus species did not find an association between partner preferences and the AVPR1a genotype (Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSadino, J. M., & Donaldson, Z. R. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00475 · Cited by 30
Fitness, risk taking, and spatial behavior covary with boldness in experimental vole populations
Eccard, J. A., Herde, A., Schuster, A., Liesenjohann, T., Knopp, T., Heckel, G., & Dammhahn, M. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8521 · Cited by 30
“…characterized by a high reproductive potential balancing strong predation pressure, a promiscuous mating system (Borkowska & Ratkiewicz, 2010; Fink et al., 2006), larger home ranges of males than females (as other Microtus species: Borowski & Owadowska, 2010; Gliwicz, 1997; Solomon &…”
BackgroundMacManes, M. D., & Lacey, E. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045524 · Cited by 29
“This strategy has been used to explore differences in gene expression in relation to multiple aspects of behavior, including the formation of social bonds [18–20].”
MethodBabb, P. L., Fernández‐Duque, E., & Schurr, T. G. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-010-9383-6 · Cited by 29
“These findings coincide with levels of intraspecific sequence diversity observed in other studies of the AVPR1A coding region in mammalian taxa (Fink et al. 2006, 2007; Phelps et al. 2009; Turner et al. 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAnestis, S. F., Webster, T. H., Kamilar, J. M., Fontenot, M. B., Watts, D. P., & Bradley, B. J. (2014) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-013-9747-z · Cited by 30
“…B. Fontenot Behavioral Sciences Division, New Iberia Research Center, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70562, USA we had quantitative measures of personality (based on 15 behavioral style indices, calculated from 3 yr of observational data), dominance rank, and baseline testosterone levels.”
BackgroundMethodRen, D., Chin, K. R., & French, J. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111638 · Cited by 28
“is not predicted by a single polymorphism in the promoter region of the AVPR1a gene [12].”
BackgroundManinger, N., Hinde, K., Mendoza, S. P., Mason, W. A., Larke, R. H., Ragen, B., Jarcho, M. R., Cherry, S. R., Rowland, D. J., Ferrer, E. E., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.028 · Cited by 27
“However, this pattern was not found across a wider sample of mammalian species (Fink et al., 2006).”
Ophir, A. G., Crino, O. L., Wilkerson-Vidal, Q. C., Wolff, J. O., & Phelps, S. M. (2007) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000108609 · Cited by 26
“Allelic diversity in the genetic architecture of the V1aR coding sequence may further complicate the story [Hammock and Young, 2005; Fink et al., 2006].”
BackgroundSex-specific clines support incipient speciation in a common European mammal
Sutter, A., Beysard, M., & Heckel, G. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.124 · Cited by 26
Gene Regulation as a Modulator of Social Preference in Voles
Hammock, E. A. D. (2007) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(07)59004-8 · Cited by 26
Microsatellite markers for the common vole (Microtus arvalis) and their cross-species utility
Walser, B., & Heckel, G. (2007) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-007-9355-6 · Cited by 26
“The markers are currently being employed in studies of dispersal and reproductive success in natural and experimental populations (Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundEvolutionary diversity as a catalyst for biological discovery
JOHNSON, Z. V., & YOUNG, L. J. (2018) · Integrative Zoology · doi:10.1111/1749-4877.12339 · Cited by 25
Cushing, B. S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150373 · Cited by 26
“However this relationship does not exist in many other rodent taxa, and in fact it has been observed that outside the genus Microtus there is no correlation between microsatellite length and mating strategy [56].”
BackgroundBeysard, M., Krebs-Wheaton, R., & Heckel, G. (2015) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0455-5 · Cited by 26
“Given the polygynous mating system of the common vole with frequent multiple paternity [46, 47], the influence of mate choice of female M.”
BackgroundRhodes, J. S., & Kawecki, T. J. (2009) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/california/9780520247666.003.0011 · Cited by 23
“Despite all the positive evidence, a recent phylogenetic analysis failed to find the predicted association between expansion in this microsatellite region and affiliative behavior in a larger sample of twenty-three species of voles (Fink et al. 2006).”
BackgroundFrom endophenotypes to evolution: social attachment, sexual fidelity and the avpr1a locus
Phelps, S. M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.09.002 · Cited by 23
“[39] found that the promiscuous montane and meadow voles lacked the microsatellite, as previously reported, but the other 4 Microtus species known to be promiscuous all had long microsatellites.”
BackgroundVasopressin Proves Essential: Vasopressin and the Modulation of Sensory Processing in Mammals
Bester‐Meredith, J. K., Fancher, A. P., & Mammarella, G. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2015.00005 · Cited by 24
Towards an integrative model of sociality in caviomorph rodents
Hayes, L. D., Burger, J. R., Soto-Gamboa, M. R., Sobrero, R., & Ebensperger, L. A. (2011) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/10-mamm-s-039.1 · Cited by 21
“Towards an integrative model of sociality in caviomorph rodents”
BackgroundGlobal Microsatellite Content Distinguishes Humans, Primates, Animals, and Plants
Galindo, C. L., McIver, L. J., McCormick, J. F., Skinner, M. A., Xie, Y., Gelhausen, R., Ng, K.-M. E., Kumar, N., & Garner, H. R. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp192 · Cited by 21
“This is the first description of a method for evaluating microsatellite content to classify individual genomes.”
BackgroundMethodOxytocin, vasopressin, and the evolution of mating systems in mammals
Freeman, S. M., & Young, L. J. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139017855.011 · Cited by 19
Voles, vasopressin, and infidelity: a molecular basis for monogamy, a platform for ethics, and more?
McKaughan, D. J. (2011) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-011-9303-1 · Cited by 19
“Not only do these results cast doubt on the claim that a single gene, V1aR, controls monogamy in any straightforward way, reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships (based on comparative cytochrome b sequencing) demonstrate that the longer microsatellites (STRs) are actually the ancestral state in voles (Fink et…”
BackgroundResultFreeman, A. R., Aulino, E. A., Caldwell, H. K., & Ophir, A. G. (2020) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.12828 · Cited by 18
Tougard, C. (2016) · Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research · doi:10.1111/jzs.12152 · Cited by 19
“…AY513842 AY513844 JN019765 JN019766 JN019773 JN019775 JN019778 JN019780 JN019762 JN019763 AY513840 JN019760 JN019761 JN019767 JN019764 JN019768 JN019771 NM H E E H H H H H H H H E H H H H H H a A: Bastos-Silveira et al. (2012); B: Castiglia et al. (2008); C: Fink et al. (2006); D: Haynes et 1 al.”
Borkowska, A., & Ratkiewicz, M. (2010) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00648.x · Cited by 19
Stetzik, L. A., Ganshevsky, D., Lende, M. N., Roache, L. E., Musatov, S. A., & Cushing, B. S. (2018) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2018.05.035 · Cited by 19
“Based upon the hypothesis that multiple mechanisms regulate social behavior [45], specifically involving an interaction between steroids and the neuropeptides oxytocin and vasopressin [4,34,46], the intermediate expression of ERα may explain why, like prairie voles, but unlike montane voles, central administration of…”
The neuroendocrine action potential
Hofmann, H. A. (2010) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.012 · Cited by 18
“A comparative analysis of PEI across the genus Microtuswould be worthwhile, as some species are (either genetically or socially) monogamous and others are polygamous (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialOxytocin and vasopressin in non-human primates
Ragen, B., & Bales, K. L. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139017855.019 · Cited by 18
Modulating vertebrate physiology by genomic fine-tuning of GPCR functions
Schöneberg, T. (2024) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2024 · Cited by 18
Multiple paternity in free-living root voles (Microtus oeconomus)
Borkowska, A., Borowski, Z., & Krysiuk, K. (2009) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.003 · Cited by 17
On the origins of diversity in social behavior
YOUNG, L. J., & ZHANG, Q. (2021) · Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology · doi:10.2502/janip.71.1.4 · Cited by 13
Evolution of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor and implications for mammalian social behaviour
Heckel, G., & FINK, S. (2008) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)00426-3 · Cited by 13
From biology to management of Savi's pine vole (Microtus savii)
Ranchelli, E., Barfknecht, R., Capizzi, D., Riga, F., Mazza, V., Dell’Agnello, F., & Zaccaroni, M. (2015) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4212 · Cited by 13
The Neurobiology of Social Affiliation and Pair Bonding
Carter, C. S., & Keverne, E. B. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803592-4.00004-3 · Cited by 14
Has Simple Sequence Repeat Mutability Been Selected to Facilitate Evolution?
Kashia, Y., & King, D. G. (2006) · Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1560/ijee_52_3-4_331 · Cited by 13
Mate Selection, Sexual Orientation, and Pair Bonding
Balthazart, J., & Young, L. J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397175-3.00048-x · Cited by 12
The neural circuits of monogamous behavior
López-Gutiérrez, M. F., Mejía-Chávez, S., Alcauter, S., & Portillo, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2022.978344 · Cited by 12
“Hence, the complexity of social monogamy has led to the conclusion that no single gene, brain structure, or neurotransmitter system can be the sole modulator of the observed behaviors (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundKeane, B., Parsons, S., Smucker, B. J., & Solomon, N. G. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1801-0 · Cited by 11
The Neurobiology and Genetics of Affiliation and Social Bonding in Animal Models
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3777-6_4 · Cited by 12
Phylogeny and phylogeography of arvicoline and lagurine voles of Mongolia
Bannikova, A. A., Lebedev, V. S., Poplavskaya, N. S., Simanovsky, S. A., Undrakhbayar, E., Adiya, Y., & Суров, А. В. (2019) · Folia Zoologica · doi:10.25225/fozo.002.2019 · Cited by 11
Henterly, A. C., Mabry, K. E., Solomon, N. G., Chesh, A. S., & Keane, B. (2011) · The American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.1674/0003-0031-165.2.412 · Cited by 9
“…species-specific genetic polymorphism in avpr1a allele length between Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus, with M. ochrogaster containing an expanded segment of repetitive microsatellite DNA in the avpr1a gene that is absent in M. pennsylvanicus (Young et al., 1999; Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialPost‐fertilization Reproductive Strategies
van Dijk, R. E., & Székely, T. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0003665 · Cited by 9
“Studies beyond these well-studied voles, however, in other species of voles and in primates found no consistent relationship between microsatellite length and mating system (Fink et al., 2006).”
BackgroundComparative neurobiology and genetics of mammalian social behavior
Beery, A. K., Kamal, Y., Sobrero, R., & Hayes, L. D. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118846506.ch3 · Cited by 9
Medial amygdala ERα expression influences monogamous behaviour of male prairie voles in the field
Lambert, C. T., Lichter, J. B., Perry, A. N., Castillo, S. A., Keane, B., Cushing, B. S., & Solomon, N. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0318 · Cited by 7
“Although laboratory studies have indicated a major influence of AVP, attempts to translate these studies to other socially monogamous mammals [26] or field settings have either not produced the predicted results or produced conflicting results [27–33].”
ResultRethinking the Architecture of Attachment: New Insights into the Role for Oxytocin Signaling
Berendzen, K. M., & Manoli, D. S. (2022) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-022-00142-5 · Cited by 9
“Numerous reviews and studies over the last decade have expressed caution in attributing widespread, functional necessity to oxytocinergic signaling in social behavior (Fink et al., 2006; Goodson, 2013; Guastella & Hickie, 2016).”
BackgroundAdvancing avian behavioral neuroendocrinology through genomics
Clayton, D. F., & London, S. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.09.004 · Cited by 7
“EventhecaseoftheV1areceptorpolymorphismismorecom- plexthaninitialreportsimplied,asaphylogeneticanalysisof25 rodentspeciesfailedtoconfirmtheassociationofthisparticular polymorphismwithsocialmonogamymorebroadly(Fink,2006).”
Anderson, N. K., Goodwin, S. E., Schuppe, E. R., Dawn, A., Preininger, D., Mangiamele, L. A., & Fuxjager, M. J. (2022) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105248 · Cited by 7
Social Games and Genic Selection Drive Mammalian Mating System Evolution and Speciation
Sinervo, B., Chaine, A. S., & Miles, D. B. (2019) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/706810 · Cited by 7
“…monogamy and polygyny in rodents have been linked to a point mutation in a vasopressin receptor gene (V1aR; Lim and Young 2004; Lim et al. 2004; Fink et al. 2006), and this gene is also linked to increased paternal behavior and reduced aggression (i.e., filiative behavior) inmonogamous species…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, S., Excoffier, L., & Heckel, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-07-18
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 10956-10960
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1544156
- OpenAlex
- W2012695658
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- social monogamy, Microtus voles, social behavior genetics, gene loss, social bonding
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Rodentia, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Behavior, Receptors, Vasopressin, Cytochromes b
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
