Cited by 52Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Beyond “oxytocin = good”: neural complexities and the flipside of social bonds

van Anders, Sari M., Goodson, James L., Kingsbury, Marcy A.·2013·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-013-0134-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Anders, S. M., Goodson, J. L., & Kingsbury, M. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2013-05-29
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1115-1118
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2006545139
Cited by
52
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, social bonding, neural mechanisms, prosocial behavior, social attachment
MeSH terms
Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review