The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 88 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
A new view of language acquisition
Open accessAbstract
At the forefront of debates on language are new data demonstrating infants' early acquisition of information about their native language. The data show that infants perceptually “map” critical aspects of ambient language in the first year of life before they can speak. Statistical properties of speech are picked up through exposure to ambient language. Moreover, linguistic experience alters infants' perception of speech, warping perception in the service of language. Infants' strategies are unexpected and unpredicted by historical views. A new theoretical position has emerged, and six postulates of this position are described.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Kuhl proposes a new view of language acquisition in which infants map ambient language through pattern detection, statistical learning, and experience-driven perceptual warping, rather than Skinnerian reinforcement or Chomskyan selection of innate universal grammar/phonetics. Six postulates are offered, including that motherese is instructive and that the critical period depends on neural commitment from experience, not just time.
Key findings
- Infants initially parse phonetic units universally, but this capacity is not speech-specific or species-specific: categorical perception occurs in infants and animals and for nonspeech stimuli; by 12 months infants no longer discriminate non-native phonetic contrasts even though they did so at 6 months.
- Infants exploit statistical properties of speech: 7-month-olds discriminated target syllables better when the transitional probability between /ko/ and /ga/ was 1.0 than when it was reduced to 0.3; 8-month-olds listened longer to new pseudowords formed from parts of original words, indicating statistical word segmentation.
- Language experience warps perception: 6-month-old US and Swedish infants showed the perceptual magnet effect only for native vowel prototypes; Japanese listeners’ multidimensional scaling map for /r-l/ showed no magnet or boundary effects, unlike American listeners.
- Vocal imitation and motherese are linked to learning: by 20 weeks infants clearly imitate /a/, /i/, and /u/ with appropriate relative formant values; infant-directed speech exaggerates vowels in the US, Russia, and Sweden; six tenets include that the critical period is influenced by neural commitment resulting from experience.
Methods
- Theoretical review/colloquium paper, not a new empirical study; it synthesizes behavioral, brain, comparative, and cross-linguistic infant studies.
- No new sample is reported; cited experiments include infants at ages such as 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 months and 12–20 weeks, plus adults and nonhuman animals.
- Main analysis is narrative synthesis and proposal of six postulates and the Native Language Magnet model; no primary statistical analysis is reported.
Limitations
- Stated: further tests are needed to determine the constraints on categorization, statistical learning, and prototype effects in infants using linguistic and nonlinguistic events; whether constraints for physical objects and speech are identical or different “remains to be examined”; animal/human differences “can be resolved with empirical tests.”
- Evident: as a review, it reports no new experimental data or formal meta-analysis, so conclusions rest on cited studies; some claims, such as bilingual separation effects, are described as anecdotal or hypothetical.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 88 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“At this age, infants clearly imitate the model, and their vowels have appropriate formant frequency values in relation to one another, even though infants' vowels occur in a much higher frequency range (93).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Kuhl P K, Meltzoff A N. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100:2425–2438. doi: 10.1121/1.417951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“At this age, infants clearly imitate the model, and their vowels have appropriate formant frequency values in relation to one another, even though infants' vowels occur in a much higher frequency range (93).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Kuhl P K, Meltzoff A N. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100:2425–2438. doi: 10.1121/1.417951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Infant-directed speech also is altered at the phonetic level and these alterations are argued to help infants learn.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The results demonstrated that the phonetic units of infant-directed speech are acoustically exaggerated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Kuhl P K, Andruski J E, Chistovich I A, Chistovich L A, Kozhevnikova E V, Ryskina V L, Stolyarova E I, Sundberg U, Lacerda F. Science. 1997;277:684–686. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5326.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results show a stretching of the acoustic space encompassing speech (Fig. 8).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Infants discriminated only between stimuli from different phonetic categories (12–14).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Eimas P D, Siqueland E R, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. Science. 1971;171:303–306. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3968.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Eimas P D. Percept Psychophys. 1974;16:513–521. [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Eimas P D. Percept Psychophys. 1975;18:341–347. [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, infants detect patterns in language input.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“These data, indicating that there is not an immutable loss of phonetic abilities for non-native units (32), did not refute the selectionist position.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Werker J F. In: An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language. Gleitman L R, Liberman M, editors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. pp. 87–107. [Google Scholar]
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding supported the view that domain-general mechanisms were responsible for infants' initial partitioning of the phonetic units of language.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, unlike adults, infants demonstrated the effect for the phonetic units of all languages (15, 16).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Lasky R E, Syrdal-Lasky A, Klein R E. J Exp Child Psych. 1975;20:215–225. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(75)90099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Streeter L A. Nature (London) 1976;259:39–41. doi: 10.1038/259039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The results demonstrate developmental change between 12 and 20 weeks—by 20 weeks, there is clear separation between the three vowel categories for infants (Fig. 7).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Adults discriminated phonetic units that crossed the “phonetic boundary” between categories but not stimuli that fell within a category.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Liberman A M, Cooper F S, Shankweiler D P, Studdert-Kennedy M. Psychol Rev. 1967;74:431–461. doi: 10.1037/h0020279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, however, the data also demonstrated that the kind of partitioning seen for speech is not limited to humans or limited to speech.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Werker and her colleagues demonstrated that, by 12 months of age, infants no longer discriminate non-native phonetic contrasts, even though they did so at 6 months of age (31).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Werker J F, Tees R C. Inf Behav Dev. 1984;7:49–63. [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Infants' strategies are unexpected and unpredicted by historical views.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The phenomenon was language-specific; Japanese adults, for example, failed to show a peak in discrimination at the phonetic boundary of an American English/ra-la/series (as in “rake” vs. “lake”) (11).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman A M, Jenkins J J, Fujimura O. Percept Psychophys. 1975;18:331–340. [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Research on cognitive development confirms the fact that categorization (83), statistical learning (84), and prototype effects (85) are not unique to speech.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Younger B A, Cohen L B. In: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Bower G H, editor. Vol. 19. San Diego: Academic; 1985. pp. 211–247. [Google Scholar]
- Not checked yetcites [84] Saffran J R, Johnson E K, Aslin R N, Newport E L. Cognition. 1999;70:27–52. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [85] Quinn P C, Eimas P D. J Exp Child Psychol. 1998;69:151–174. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two systems are thus tightly coupled early on, but the coupling is seen as a coregistration of auditory and motor information, a polymodal mapping, rather than one in which the representation is specified in motor terms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Perceptual experience that guides sensory-motor learning also is seen in infants' imitation of nonspeech oral movements (94, 95) and in sign language (96).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Early Dev Parent. 1977;6:179–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Not checked yetcites [95] Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Inf Behav Dev. 1994;17:83–99. doi: 10.1016/0163-6383(94)90024-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Petitto L A, Marentette P F. Science. 1991;251:1493–1496. doi: 10.1126/science.2006424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A model reflecting this developmental sequence from universal perception to language-specific perception, called the Native Language Magnet model, proposes that infants' mapping of ambient language warps the acoustic dimensions underlying speech, producing a complex network, or filter, through which language is perceived (39, 40, 82).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Kuhl P K. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:812–822. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [40] Kuhl P K. In: The New Cognitive Neurosciences. 2nd Ed. Gazzaniga M S, editor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. pp. 99–115. [Google Scholar]
- Not checked yetcites [82] Kuhl P K. In: Mechanistic Relationships Between Development and Learning. Carew T J, Menzel R, Shatz C J, editors. New York: Wiley; 1998. pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This universal contouring soon gives way to a language-specific mapping that distorts perception, completely revising the perceptual space underlying speech processing (65).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Kuhl P K, Williams K A, Lacerda F, Stevens K N, Lindblom B. Science. 1992;255:606–608. doi: 10.1126/science.1736364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Vocal learning critically depends on hearing the vocalizations of others and hearing oneself produce sound.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mothers addressing infants also increase the variety of exemplars they use, behaving in a way that makes mothers resemble many different talkers, a feature shown to assist category learning in second-language learners (107).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] Lively S E, Logan J S, Pisoni D B. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;94:1242–1255. doi: 10.1121/1.408177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They also present new words in a great variety of contexts, which would highlight the internal transitional probabilities of the new words against the backdrop of a variety of contexts (58).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Goodsitt J V, Morgan J L, Kuhl P K. J Child Lang. 1993;20:229–252. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900008266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies show that feedback and reinforcement are not necessary in this process; listeners simply need the right kind of listening experience (36, 113).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] McClelland J L, Thomas A, McCandliss B D, Fiez J A. In: Brain, Behavioral, and Cognitive Disorders: The Neurocomputational Perspective. Reggia J, Ruppin E, Glanzman D, editors. Oxford: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 75–80. [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [113] Pisoni D B. In: Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. Tohkura Y, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Sagisaka Y, editors. Tokyo: Ohmsha; 1992. pp. 143–151. [Google Scholar]
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When introducing new words, parents repeat the word often in sterotyped frames (“Where's the __ ,” “See the __ ,” “That's a __ ” (110), which would highlight the items in sentence-final position.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Peters A M. The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may be the case because it is easier to map two different sets of phonetic categories (one for each of the two languages) if they can be perceptually separated.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Infants exposed to two languages do much better if each parent speaks one of the two languages, rather than both parents speaking both languages.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hypothesis is that, for Japanese people, learning to process English requires the development of a new map, one more appropriate for English.”
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
In the paper
“Data gathered by using functional MRI techniques indicate that adult bilinguals who acquire both languages early in life activate overlapping regions of the brain when processing the two languages, whereas those who learn the second language later in life activate two distinct regions of the brain for the two languages (114).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Kim K H S, Relkin N R, Lee K M, Hirsch J. Nature (London) 1997;388:172–174. doi: 10.1038/40623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Early in life, interference effects are minimal and two different mappings can be acquired, as is the case for infants learning two languages.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“New training studies suggest that exaggerating the dimensions of foreign language contrasts (36), as well as providing listeners with multiple instances spoken by many talkers (113), are effective training methods.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] McClelland J L, Thomas A, McCandliss B D, Fiez J A. In: Brain, Behavioral, and Cognitive Disorders: The Neurocomputational Perspective. Reggia J, Ruppin E, Glanzman D, editors. Oxford: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 75–80. [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [113] Pisoni D B. In: Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. Tohkura Y, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Sagisaka Y, editors. Tokyo: Ohmsha; 1992. pp. 143–151. [Google Scholar]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exaggerating speech not only makes it more discriminable for infants, it highlights critical parameters used in the native language.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The learning strategies used by infants may themselves have influenced the nature of language, in much the same way that general auditory processing influenced the selection of phonetic units for language during its evolution.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Infants are neither the tabula rasas that Skinner described nor the innate grammarians that Chomsky envisioned.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(iv) vocal imitation links speech perception and production early, and auditory, visual, and motor information are coregistered for speech categories;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(v) adults addressing infants unconsciously alter their speech to match infants' learning strategies, and this is instrumental in supporting infants' initial mapping of speech;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Language is thus innately discoverable, but not innate in the way that selectionist models suggested.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Infants' performance in laboratory speech perception tasks reflects the mechanisms underlying natural language acquisition.
“The data show that infants perceptually “map” critical aspects of ambient language in the first year of life before they can speak.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Listening preferences in infancy indicate language-specific learning.
“American infants tested at 6 months show no listening preference for words with the strong/weak as opposed to the weak/strong pattern, but by 9 months they exhibit a strong preference for the pattern typical of their native language (55).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The statistical learning demonstrated with artificial speech stimuli generalizes to natural language acquisition.
“New research shows that infants detect and exploit the statistical properties of the language they hear to find word candidates in running speech before they know the meanings of words.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Children learn language more naturally and efficiently than adults.
“There is no doubt that children learn language more naturally and efficiently than adults, a paradox given adults' superior cognitive skills.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Infants exposed to two languages do much better if each parent speaks one of the two languages, rather than both parents speaking both languages.
“Anecdotal evidence suggests that infants exposed to two languages do much better if each parent speaks one of the two languages, rather than both parents speaking both languages.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Humans are easily able to acquire huge amounts of biologically primary knowledge outside of educational contexts and without a discernible working memory load.”
From An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks (2012) · cites this paper as Kuhl 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reference 94 has conflicting publication years
MinorReference 94 lists 1977 as its publication year, but the date encoded in its DOI is September-December 1997.
“94.Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Early Dev Parent. 1977;6:179–192.”
“doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R.”
Citations
Cites
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
Skinner, B. F. (1957) · doi:10.1037/11256-000 · Cited by 5,759
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,082
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Chomsky (1959) · doi:10.2307/411334 · Cited by 3,425
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Gallistel, C. R. (1990) · Cited by 2,571
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Bizzi, E. (2000) · Cited by 2,547
Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7375928 · Cited by 2,317
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- K Wexler, P W Culicover Formal Principles of Language Acquisition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980).
- K N Stevens Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
- J M Pickett The Acoustics of Speech Communication (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1999).
- N Gross, P C Judge, O Port, S H Wildstrom BusinessWeek, February 23, 60–72. (1998).
- J F Werker An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language, eds L R Gleitman, M Liberman (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 87–107 (1995).
- P K Kuhl Child Phonology: Vol. 2. Perception, eds G H Yeni-Komshian, J F Kavanagh, C A Ferguson (Academic, New York), pp. 41–66 (1980).
- K H S Kim, N R Relkin, K M Lee, J Hirsch Nature (London) 388, 172–174 (1997).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 769
Ching, T. Y. C., Zhang, V. W., Flynn, C., Burns, L., Button, L., Hou, S., McGhie, K., & Buynder, P. V. (2017) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1346307 · Cited by 94
Language Learning Disabilities
Tallal, P. A. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01263.x · Cited by 94
Developmental constraints on language development in children with cochlear implants
Tomblin, J. B., Barker, B. A., & Hubbs, S. (2007) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992020701383043 · Cited by 100
Marie, C., Kujala, T., & Besson, M. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.006 · Cited by 95
Simonet, M. (2010) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.002 · Cited by 92
Sensitivity of Turkish infants to vowel harmony
Hohenberger, A., Altan, A., Kaya, U., Tuncer, Ö. K., & Avcu, E. (2016) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.20.02hon · Cited by 93
Human speech and birdsong: Communication and the social brain
Kuhl, P. K. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1733998100 · Cited by 91
Self-citationCortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies
Obleser, J., Elbert, T. R., Lahiri, A., & Eulitz, C. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00193-3 · Cited by 91
Phonotactic acquisition in healthy preterm infants
Gonzalez‐Gomez, N., & Thierry Nazzi, A. (2012) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01186.x · Cited by 89
Detey, S. (2009) · Tokyo University of Foreign Studies · doi:10.1075/tufs.1.12det · Cited by 89
Falk, D. (2016) · PubMed · doi:10.4436/jass.94027 · Cited by 91
Vocal learning in birds and humans
Wilbrecht, L., & Nottebohm, F. (2003) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.10073 · Cited by 88
Atypical language lateralization in epilepsy patients
Möddel, G., Lineweaver, T. T., Schuele, S., Reinholz, J., & Loddenkemper, T. (2009) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.02000.x · Cited by 83
Adult English Language Learners with Limited Literacy.
Bigelow, M., & Schwarz, R. L. (2010) · Cited by 82
Choral speech: the amelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronal system
Kalinowski, J. S., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00063-0 · Cited by 85
The origins of babytalk: smiling, teaching or social convergence?
Kalashnikova, M., Carignan, C., & Burnham, D. K. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170306 · Cited by 79
Syntax without language: Neurobiological evidence for cross-domain syntactic computations
Tettamanti, M., Rotondi, I., Perani, D., Scotti, G., Fazio, F., Cappa, S. F., & Moro, A. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.014 · Cited by 78
A hybrid dynamic time warping-deep neural network architecture for unsupervised acoustic modeling
Thiollière, R., Dunbar, E., Synnaeve, G., Versteegh, M., & Emmanuel Dupoux, A. (2015) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2015-640 · Cited by 80
A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain
Changeux, J., Goulas, A., & Hilgetag, C. C. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa365 · Cited by 80
Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds
Woolley, S. M. N. (2012) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21014 · Cited by 79
Saito, K. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12015 · Cited by 75
L2 immersion causes non-native-like L1 pronunciation in German attriters
Bergmann, C., Nota, A., Sprenger, S., & Schmid, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.07.001 · Cited by 89
The Development of the Auditory System from Conception to Term
Lasky, R. E., & Williams, A. L. (2005) · NeoReviews · doi:10.1542/neo.6-3-e141 · Cited by 73
Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: implications for dyslexia
Parviainen, T. M., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. H. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh206 · Cited by 73
Mahdhaoui, A., Chétouani, M., Cassel, R., Saint‐Georges, C., Parlato-Oliveira, É., Laznik, M.-C., Apicella, F., Muratori, F., Maestro, S., & Cohen, D. (2011) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.332 · Cited by 77
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A., & Eulitz, C. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.019 · Cited by 71
The neural basis of non-native speech perception in bilingual children
Archila‐Suerte, P., Zevin, J. D., Ramos-Nuñez, A. I., & Hernández, A. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.023 · Cited by 72
Pierce, L. J., Genesee, F. H., Delcenserie, A., & Morgan, G. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000236 · Cited by 73
Second-language phonology: the role of perception
Escudero, P. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230625396_5 · Cited by 68
Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2011) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.005 · Cited by 67
Skulmowski, A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y · Cited by 84
Nagle, C. (2017) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12275 · Cited by 66
Neural plasticity in speech acquisition and learning
Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728907002908 · Cited by 66
Marcelli, D., & Cohen, D. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-2-294-10368-1.00001-2 · Cited by 65
The role of speech rhythm in language discrimination: further tests with a non‐human primate
Tincoff, R., HAUSER, M. D., Tsao, F., Spaepen, G. M., Ramus, F., & Mehler, J. (2004) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00390.x · Cited by 65
Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape
Oller, D. K., Ramsay, G., Bene, E. R., Long, H. L., & Griebel, U. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0255 · Cited by 64
Vocal imitation of song and speech
Mantell, J. T., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.008 · Cited by 65
Siegelman, N., & Arnon, I. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.003 · Cited by 65
Howard, I. S., & Messum, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110334 · Cited by 63
Auditory-motor integration during fast repetition: the neuronal correlates of shadowing
Peschke, C., Ziegler, W., Kappes, J., & Baumgaertner, A. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.061 · Cited by 59
Li, P. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01028.x · Cited by 59
Linguistic perception and second language acquisition
Boersma, P., Zonneveld, W., Kager, R., & Escudero, P. (2005) · Cited by 57
Irvine, D. R. F. (2007) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.006 · Cited by 57
Yildiz, I. B., von Kriegstein, K., & Kiebel, S. J. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003219 · Cited by 55
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & de Boer, B. (2001) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03478.x · Cited by 57
Self-citationThe role of left inferior frontal cortex during audiovisual speech perception in infants
Altvater‐Mackensen, N., & Großmann, T. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.061 · Cited by 56
Magnetoencephalography is feasible for infant assessment of auditory discrimination
Cheour, M., Imada, T., Taulu, S., Ahonen, A., Salonen, J., & Kuhl, P. (2004) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.030 · Cited by 53
Self-citationApparent phonetic approximation: English loanwords in Old Quebec French
Paradis, C., & LaCharité, D. (2008) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226707004963 · Cited by 53
Partial productivity of linguistic constructions: Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption
Goldberg, A. E. (2016) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.17 · Cited by 53
Neonatal imitation in context: Sensorimotor development in the perinatal period
Keven, N., & Akins, K. A. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16000911 · Cited by 56
Advanced Second Language Segmental and Suprasegmental Acquisition
Saito, K. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119261650.ch15 · Cited by 54
Complex linguistic rules modulate early auditory brain responses
Sun, Y., Giavazzi, M., Adda‐Decker, M., Barbosa, L. S., Kouider, S., Bachoud‐Lévi, A., Jacquemot, C., & Peperkamp, S. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.06.009 · Cited by 50
Speech Sound Production in 2-Year-Olds Who Are Hard of Hearing
Ambrose, S. E., Berry, L., Walker, E. A., Harrison, M. F., Oleson, J., & Moeller, M. P. (2014) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2014_ajslp-13-0039 · Cited by 50
Audio–Visual Interactions with Intact Clearly Audible Speech
Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980343000701 · Cited by 50
Toward a New Scientific Visualization for the Language Sciences
Onnis, L., & Spivey, M. J. (2012) · Information · doi:10.3390/info3010124 · Cited by 49
Word learning can be achieved without feedback: Implications for aphasia therapy
Breitenstein, C., Kamping, S., Jansen, A., Schomacher, M., & Knecht, S. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00275 · Cited by 49
Imitation of second language sounds in relation to L2 perception and production
Hao, Y.-C., & de Jong, K. J. (2015) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.10.003 · Cited by 48
Singing with yourself: Evidence for an inverse modeling account of poor-pitch singing
Pfordresher, P. Q., & Mantell, J. T. (2014) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.005 · Cited by 48
Peter, V., Kalashnikova, M., Santos, A., & Burnham, D. K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34273 · Cited by 48
Bilingual Infants Demonstrate Advantages in Learning Words in a Third Language
Singh, L. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12852 · Cited by 48
COMMUNICATIVE FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE SUPRASEGMENTAL LEARNING
Saito, K., & Wu, X. (2014) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263114000114 · Cited by 50
Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology.
ETTLINGER, M., BRADLOW, A. R., & WONG, P. C. M. (2014) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716412000586 · Cited by 47
Altvater‐Mackensen, N., & Großmann, T. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12320 · Cited by 47
Vallabha, G. K., & McClelland, J. L. (2007) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.1.53 · Cited by 47
Arjmandi, M., Houston, D., & Dilley, L. C. (2021) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001136 · Cited by 16
Cheng, B., Zhang, X., Fan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01178 · Cited by 44
Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages
Chang, C. B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108766340.027 · Cited by 44
Saito, K. (2013) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716413000271 · Cited by 50
Behavioral and neuronal aspects of developmental sensitive periods
Bischof, H. (2007) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328014204e · Cited by 44
Shared Orthography: Do Shared Written Symbols Influence the Perception of L2 Sounds?
Pytlyk, C. (2011) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01244.x · Cited by 43
Saalfeld, A. K. (2012) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01191.x · Cited by 43
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1305 · Cited by 48
Liu, R., & Holt, L. L. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21392 · Cited by 43
Altun, D., Erden, F. T., & Snow, C. E. (2018) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22153 · Cited by 49
Family ASL: An Early Start to Equitable Education for Deaf Children
Lillo‐Martin, D., Gale, E., & Pichler, D. C. (2021) · Topics in Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.1177/02711214211031307 · Cited by 48
The Whorfian brain: Neuroscientific approaches to linguistic relativity
Athanasopoulos, P., & Casaponsa, A. (2020) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2020.1769050 · Cited by 42
Falandays, J. B., & Smaldino, P. E. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13183 · Cited by 43
Rendall, D., & Owren, M. J. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139003551.010 · Cited by 41
Language Organization in the Bilingual and Multilingual Brain
Maschio, N. D., & Abutalebi, J. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119387725.ch9 · Cited by 41
Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels
Vallabha, G. K., & Tuller, B. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1764832 · Cited by 40
Creativity, information, and consciousness: The information dynamics of thinking
Wiggins, G. A. (2018) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2018.05.001 · Cited by 45
Mottron, L., Ostrolenk, A., & Gagnon, D. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12081112 · Cited by 43
Teaching English Stress: A Case Study
Sadat‐Tehrani, N. (2017) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.332 · Cited by 39
Nonlinear Dynamics in Human Behavior
Tuller, B., Nguyen, N., Lancia, L., & Vallabha, G. K. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16262-6 · Cited by 39
Birdsong, D. P. (2003) · Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère · doi:10.4000/aile.1150 · Cited by 39
Cohen, D. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.011 · Cited by 44
Solomon, O. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444342901.ch5 · Cited by 39
Prosody and Second Language Teaching: Lessons from L2 Speech Perception and Production Research
Lengeris, Α. (2012) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_3 · Cited by 38
Abbs, B., Gupta, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2008) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716408080272 · Cited by 38
The role of language and communication impairments within autism
Gernsbacher, M. A., Geye, H. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2005) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.4.06ger · Cited by 39
Saito, K., Suzukida, Y., Tran, M. T. C., & Tierney, A. T. (2021) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12447 · Cited by 40
Bottlenose dolphin mothers modify signature whistles in the presence of their own calves
Sayigh, L. S., Haddad, N. E., Tyack, P. L., Janik, V. M., Wells, R. S., & Jensen, F. H. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2300262120 · Cited by 41
Bosmans, D., & Hurd, S. (2016) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1233049 · Cited by 40
Verbal labels facilitate tactile perception
Miller, T. M., Schmidt, T. T., Blankenburg, F., & Friedemann Pulvermüller, A. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.010 · Cited by 37
Speech Production From a Developmental Perspective
Redford, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0130 · Cited by 43
Peschke, C., Ziegler, W., Eisenberger, J., & Baumgaertner, A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.025 · Cited by 37
Blom, E., & Bosma, E. (2016) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000915000574 · Cited by 43
Navigating conflicting phonotactic constraints in bilingual speech perception
Carlson, M. T., Goldrick, M., Blasingame, M., & Fink, A. (2015) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000334 · Cited by 36
Shapiro, A. D., Tyack, P. L., & Seneff, S. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.020 · Cited by 36
Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2018) · Glossa a journal of general linguistics · doi:10.5334/gjgl.330 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhl, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhl, Patricia K.
- ORCID
- Kuhl, Patricia K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-10-24
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 11850-11857
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC34178
- OpenAlex
- W1972159947
- Semantic Scholar
- 4ea6e708012a19bcd4674f1607fd1e1a03b93eaf
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 42.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (HD 37954)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD037954, HD37954)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- language acquisition, infant speech perception, statistical learning, perceptual mapping, language experience, language bootstrapping, infant language development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Haplorhini, Humans, Infant, Language Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
