CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of Glycosphingolipid Biosynthesis Reduces Secretion of the β-Amyloid Precursor Protein and Amyloid β-Peptide*[boxs]

Tamboli, Irfan Y., Prager, Kai, Barth, Esther, Heneka, Michael, Sandhoff, Konrad, Walter, Jochen·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m414525200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m414525200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cell viability was not significantly affected during stable expression of GGA1 variants.

    “Cell viability was assessed by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay as described previously (Tamboli et al., 2005), and was not significantly affected during stable expression of GGA1 variants (data not shown).”

    From GGA1 Is Expressed in the Human Brain and Affects the Generation of Amyloid β-Peptide (2006) · cites this paper as Tamboli et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Selkoe, 2001, Physiol. Rev., 81, 741, 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aguzzi, 2003, Science, 302, 814, 10.1126/science.1087348 · DOI
  3. Annaert, 2002, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 18, 25, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.020402.142302 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Walter, 2001, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 11, 585, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00253-1 · DOI
  5. Sisodia, 1990, Science, 248, 492, 10.1126/science.1691865 · DOI
  6. Haass, 1992, Nature, 357, 500, 10.1038/357500a0 · DOI
  7. Koo, 1996, J. Cell Sci., 109, 991, 10.1242/jcs.109.5.991 · DOI
  8. Steiner, 2000, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 1, 217, 10.1038/35043065 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wolozin, 2004, Neuron, 41, 7, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00840-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hartmann, 2001, Trends Neurosci., 24, S45, 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01990-1 · DOI
  11. Simons, 2002, J. Clin. Investig., 110, 597, 10.1172/JCI0216390 · DOI
  12. Kovacs, 1996, Nat. Med., 2, 224, 10.1038/nm0296-224 · DOI
  13. Puglielli, 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 905, 10.1038/ncb1001-905 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hutter-Paier, 2004, Neuron, 44, 227, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.043 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Abad-Rodriguez, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 167, 953, 10.1083/jcb.200404149 · DOI
  16. Kojro, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 5815, 10.1073/pnas.081612998 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Runz, 2002, J. Neurosci., 22, 1679, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01679.2002 · DOI
  18. Ehehalt, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 160, 113, 10.1083/jcb.200207113 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cutler, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 2070, 10.1073/pnas.0305799101 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Yanagisawa, 1995, Nat. Med., 1, 1062, 10.1038/nm1095-1062 · DOI
  21. Yanagisawa, 1998, Neurobiol. Aging, 19, S65, 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00032-3 · DOI
  22. Hayashi, 2004, J. Neurosci., 24, 4894, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-04.2004 · DOI
  23. Kolter, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 25859, 10.1074/jbc.R200001200 · DOI
  24. Sprong, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 504, 10.1038/35080071 · DOI
  25. Kolter, 1998, Brain Pathol., 8, 79, 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00138.x · DOI
  26. Brown, 1998, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 14, 111, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111 · DOI
  27. Marks, 2002, Trends Cell Biol., 12, 605, 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02399-1 · DOI
  28. Schuette, 1999, Biol. Chem., 380, 759, 10.1515/BC.1999.096 · DOI
  29. Walter, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 1896, 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1896 · DOI
  30. Rosenwald, 1994, J. Lipid Res., 35, 1232, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)39966-1 · DOI
  31. Kok, 1998, J. Cell Biol., 142, 25, 10.1083/jcb.142.1.25 · DOI
  32. Naslavsky, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 20763, 10.1074/jbc.274.30.20763 · DOI
  33. Mutoh, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 26001, 10.1074/jbc.273.40.26001 · DOI
  34. Puglielli, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 19777, 10.1074/jbc.M300466200 · DOI
  35. Fluhrer, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 5531, 10.1074/jbc.M211485200 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lee, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 4458, 10.1074/jbc.M210105200 · DOI
  37. Koo, 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 17386, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32449-3 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ichikawa, 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 91, 2703, 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2703 · DOI
  39. Sprong, 2001, J. Cell Biol., 155, 369, 10.1083/jcb.200106104 · DOI
  40. Rawat, 2004, Virology, 318, 55, 10.1016/j.virol.2003.08.042 · DOI
  41. Smith, 2003, FEBS Lett., 555, 199, 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01220-1 · DOI
  42. Spilsberg, 2003, Traffic, 4, 544, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00111.x · DOI
  43. Veldman, 2003, FASEB J., 17, 1144, 10.1096/fj.02-1053fje · DOI
  44. Komori, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 8981, 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8981 · DOI
  45. Opekarova, 2003, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1610, 11, 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00708-3 · DOI
  46. Matsuoka, 2003, J. Neurosci., 23, 29, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-01-00029.2003 · DOI
  47. Sawamura, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 11984, 10.1074/jbc.M309832200 · DOI
  48. Zha, 2004, Mol. Psychiatry
  49. Yamashita, 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 3445, 10.1073/pnas.0635898100 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Muniz, 2000, EMBO J., 19, 10, 10.1093/emboj/19.1.10 · DOI
  51. Sutterlin, 1997, J. Cell Sci., 110, 2703, 10.1242/jcs.110.21.2703 · DOI
  52. Watanabe, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 49538, 10.1074/jbc.M206209200 · DOI
  53. Chyung, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 51035, 10.1074/jbc.M304989200 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Koo, 1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 87, 1561, 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1561 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tamboli, I. Y., Prager, K., Barth, E., Heneka, M., Sandhoff, K., & Walter, J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
280
Issue
30
Pages
28110-28117
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m414525200
Cited by
110
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review