Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cooperative Folding and Ligand-binding Properties of LRP6 β-Propeller Domains

Liu, Chia-Chen, Pearson, Chelsea, Bu, Guojun·2009·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls cell growth during development, and its misregulation in adults can cause human diseases. LRP6, the essential co-receptor for the Wnt pathway, consists of four beta-propeller domains flanked by epidermal growth factor repeats in its extracellular region. To understand the maturation and ligand-binding properties of individual BP domains, we generated soluble receptor consisting of individual BPs, as well as combinations of these domains. We show that BP1, BP2, and BP4 each can be folded and secreted, and their secretion was enhanced by co-expression of Mesd, a molecular chaperone essential for LRP6 folding and maturation. BP3 is not secreted when expressed on its own or in combination with BP2 or BP1 and 2 (BP12); however, folding and secretion of BP3 is vastly enhanced when expressed together with BP4. Similar cooperative folding and maturation was observed between BP1 and BP2. These results suggest that BP1 forms a functional folding unit with BP2, whereas BP3 folds together with BP4. Using these BP constructs, we also found that BP12 and BP34 constitute independent ligand-binding domains capable of binding Wnt3a, Dkk1, and Mesd. The ability of Mesd to block the binding of both Wnt3a and Dkk1 to LRP6 enables this specialized chaperone to function as a Wnt signaling modulator. Together, our studies reveal unique properties of the LRP6 BP domains and provide novel tools to understand LRP6 function in ligand binding and Wnt signaling. Our re…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m807285200

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Wodarz, 1998, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 14, 59, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.59 · DOI
  2. Lustig, 2003, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 129, 199, 10.1007/s00432-003-0431-0 · DOI
  3. He, 2004, Development, 131, 1663, 10.1242/dev.01117 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clevers, 2006, Cell, 127, 469, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Pinson, 2000, Nature, 407, 535, 10.1038/35035124 · DOI
  6. Mani, 2007, Science, 315, 1278, 10.1126/science.1136370 · DOI
  7. Kubota, 2008, J. Bone Miner. Res., 23, 1661, 10.1359/jbmr.080512 · DOI
  8. Jeon, 2001, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 499, 10.1038/88556 · DOI
  9. Beglova, 2004, Mol. Cell, 6, 281, 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.038 · DOI
  10. Glinka, 1998, Nature, 391, 357, 10.1038/34848 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Mao, 2001, Nature, 411, 321, 10.1038/35077108 · DOI
  12. Semenov, 2001, Curr. Biol., 11, 951, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00290-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. MacDonald, 2004, Development, 131, 2543, 10.1242/dev.01126 · DOI
  14. Mao, 2002, Nature, 417, 664, 10.1038/nature756 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Semenov, 2008, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 21427, 10.1074/jbc.M800014200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Culi, 2004, EMBO J., 23, 1372, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600132 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Koduri, 2007, Biochemistry, 46, 6570, 10.1021/bi700049g · DOI · Paper page
  18. Li, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 17187, 10.1074/jbc.M000490200 · DOI
  19. Bu, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 22218, 10.1074/jbc.271.36.22218 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Brown, 1998, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 248, 879, 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9061 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lal, 2005, Mol. Cel. Probes, 19, 385, 10.1016/j.mcp.2005.06.007 · DOI
  22. Veeman, 2003, Curr. Biol., 13, 680, 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00240-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zi, 2005, Cancer Res., 65, 9762, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0103 · DOI
  24. Bafico, 2004, Cancer Cell, 6, 497, 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.032 · DOI
  25. Li, 2005, Future Oncol., 1, 673, 10.2217/14796694.1.5.673 · DOI
  26. Bu, 2001, Int. Rev. Cytol., 209, 79, 10.1016/S0074-7696(01)09011-8 · DOI
  27. Kohler, 2006, J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 7, 131, 10.1007/s10969-007-9016-5 · DOI
  28. Zhang, 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 4677, 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4677-4684.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. You, 2004, Cancer Res., 64, 5385, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1227 · DOI
  30. DeAlmeida, 2007, Cancer Res., 67, 5371, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0266 · DOI
  31. Reya, 2005, Nature, 434, 843, 10.1038/nature03319 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kuhnert, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 266, 10.1073/pnas.2536800100 · DOI
  33. Singh, 1990, EMBO J., 9, 631, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08155.x · DOI
  34. Tian, 2003, N. Engl. J. Med., 349, 2483, 10.1056/NEJMoa030847 · DOI
  35. Bafico, 1998, Oncogene, 16, 2819, 10.1038/sj.onc.1201797 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, C.-C., Pearson, C., & Bu, G.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
284
Issue
22
Pages
15299-15307
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
30
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review