Cited by 109Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Receptors, Ion Channels, and Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Microglial Dynamics

Open access
Madry, Christian, Attwell, David·2015·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Microglia, the innate immune cells of the CNS, play a pivotal role in brain injury and disease. Microglia are extremely motile; their highly ramified processes constantly survey the brain parenchyma, and they respond promptly to brain damage with targeted process movement toward the injury site. Microglia play a key role in brain development and function by pruning synapses during development, phagocytosing apoptotic newborn neurons, and regulating neuronal activity by direct microglia-neuron or indirect microglia-astrocyte-neuron interactions, which all depend on their process motility. This review highlights recent discoveries about microglial dynamics, focusing on the receptors, ion channels, and signaling pathways involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.r115.637157

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Striatal microglia are enriched in mRNAs encoding mature microglia-specific homeostatic surveillance proteins, including those mediating G-protein-coupled chemosensing, chemotaxis, GTP signaling, and actin polymerization.

    “In contrast, stMg are enriched in mRNAs encoding mature microglia-specific homeostatic surveillance proteins14,15, including those that mediate G-protein-coupled chemosensing, chemotaxis, GTP signaling, and actin polymerization20 (Fig. 1d,e, Supplementary Fig. 5a,b, Supplementary Table 3).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madry, C., & Attwell, D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
290
Issue
20
Pages
12443-12450
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081351019
Cited by
109
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (099222/Z/12/Z, 99222)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
microglia, microglial motility, microglial receptors, ion channels, signaling pathways, brain injury, synaptic pruning, microglia-neuron interaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain Injuries, Cell Communication, Cell Movement, Humans, Ion Channels, Neurons, Phagocytosis, Receptors, Cell Surface, Synapses, Apoptosis, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review