Cited by 1,079Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research

Singer, Tania·2006·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Social neuro-science has recently started to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying our ability to understand the mental and emotional states of others. In this review, imaging research conducted on theory of mind (ToM or mentalizing) and empathy is selectively reviewed. It is proposed that even though these abilities are often used as synonyms in the literature these capacities represent different abilities that rely on different neuronal circuitry. ToM refers to our ability to understand mental states such as intentions, goals and beliefs, and relies on structures of the temporal lobe and the pre-frontal cortex. In contrast, empathy refers to our ability to share the feelings (emotions and sensations) of others and relies on sensorimotor cortices as well as limbic and para-limbic structures. It is further argued that the concept of empathy as used in lay terms refers to a multi-level construct extending from simple forms of emotion contagion to complex forms of cognitive perspective taking. Future research should investigate the relative contribution of empathizing and mentalizing abilities in the understanding of other people's states. Finally, it is suggested that the abilities to understand other people's thoughts and to share their affects display different ontogenetic trajectories reflecting the different developmental paths of their underlying neural structures. In particular, empathy develops much earlier than mentalizing abilities, because the former relys on limbic structures which develop early in ontogeny, whereas the latter rely on lateral temporal lobe and pre-frontal structures which are among the last to fully mature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both shared representations (SRs) and mental state attributions (MSAs) are involved in processing information about targets' internal states.

    “These 2 lines of research converge to suggest that both SRs and MSAs are involved in processing information about targets' internal states (14, 19, 20).”

    From The neural bases of empathic accuracy (2009) · cites this paper as [14]

  • The TPJ is engaged when assessing false beliefs, detecting deception, and more generally when shifting attention away from invalid cues.

    “The TPJ is engaged when assessing false beliefs (14), detecting deception (32), and more generally when shifting attention away from invalid cues (34).”

    From The neural bases of empathic accuracy (2009) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Singer, Tania
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
855-863
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139401165
Cited by
1,079
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 75
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
empathy, theory of mind, mentalization, neural basis of empathy, ontogeny, emotional contagion, perspective taking, limbic system, prefrontal cortex, temporal lobe, sensorimotor cortex, social cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Processes, Research, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Self Concept, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review