The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Load and Working Memory in Multimedia Learning: Conceptual and Measurement Issues
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews contemporary research on multimedia learning that uses cognitive load theory as the major theoretical framework. In particular, we address the extent to which working memory has been conceptualized and measured in this research, what kind of subjective measures of cognitive load have been used and whether such measures are combined with other measures of cognitive load, and how results from subjective measures have been related to learning and achievement. The findings show that most of the reviewed studies did not include any clear conceptualization or measurement of working memory, used only general subjective measures containing one or very few items, and did not report findings consistent with the hypothesized relationship between cognitive load and multimedia learning. The findings are discussed in relation to the broader goal of improving research on cognitive load in the context of multimedia learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This finding may reflect the cognitive demands of critical evaluation, as students who prioritise reasoning must allocate significant cognitive resources to assess the reliability and consistency of information (Anmarkrud et al., 2019).”
From “ ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.” Epistemic beliefs and metacognitive accuracy in students' integration of ChatGPT content into academic writing (2025) · cites this paper as Anmarkrud et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048 · cited 2×
“Sweller (1988) hypothesized that if learners treat problem solving as the primary task, learning becomes a secondary task, and poorer learning could result from high-demand problem solving.”
BackgroundBaddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 1×
“According to this model, working memory consists of four components: the central executive, the phonological loop, the visuo-spatial sketchpad, and the episodic buffer (Baddeley, 2000).”
MethodCognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205 · Cited by 6,023
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2 · Cited by 2,894
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 · Cited by 2,206
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 · Cited by 2,150
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Sweller, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5 · Cited by 2,020
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
(2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819 · Cited by 1,595
Working Memory: The Multiple-Component Model
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999) · Models of Working Memory · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174909.005 · Cited by 1,374 · cited 3×
“Although cognitive load theory often refers to Baddeley’s (1992, 1999; Baddeley & Logie, 1999) model of working memory as an important foundation, it has also been argued that the link between cognitive load theory and models of working memory is “loose and appears at least partly inconsistent”…”
BackgroundMethodPaas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122 · Cited by 1,198
Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought
de Jong, T. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 · Cited by 1,180
Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1 · Cited by 1,066
When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715 · Cited by 1,051 · cited 1×
“…2014).1 Of note is that “multimedia” may be conceptualized more narrowly, such as simple combinations of text and graphic content within the same document, as exemplified by the work of Mayer and colleagues (e.g., Mayer, 1989; Mayer, Bove, Bryman, Mars, & Tapangco, 1996; Mayer & Gallini, 1990).”
BackgroundMayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187 · Cited by 1,029
Baddeley, A. D. (1999) · doi:10.4324/9780203345160 · Cited by 816
Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?
Kalyuga, S. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7 · Cited by 725
When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579 · Cited by 548
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020 · Cited by 412
The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations
Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., & Laimay, C. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.009 · Cited by 137
Timing and Frequency of Mental Effort Measurement: Evidence in Favour of Repeated Measures
van Gog, T., Kirschner, F., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2883 · Cited by 130
Measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning: a comparison of different objective measures
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9413-5 · Cited by 98
Measuring physician cognitive load: validity evidence for a physiologic and a psychometric tool
Szulewski, A., Gegenfurtner, A., Howes, D. W., Sivilotti, M. L. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9725-2 · Cited by 94
Eitel, A., Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3004 · Cited by 85
Measuring cognitive load during procedural skills training with colonoscopy as an exemplar
Sewell, J. L., Boscardin, C. K., Young, J. Q., ten Cate, O., & O'Sullivan, P. S. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12965 · Cited by 64 · cited 3×
“The results were consistent with their hypothesis: Participants in the condition with visual representations rated their cognitive load as lower during the learning phase and obtained better results on the posttest compared to participants in the control condition. In other studies, however, the intervention in questi…”
BackgroundResultRoelle, J., Lehmkuhl, N., Beyer, M.-U., & Berthold, K. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000010 · Cited by 42
Research works printed but not linked: 146
- 10.1080/00220973.2016.1143793 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00048-0 · DOI
- 10.1027/1015-5759.25.2.92 · DOI
- Amadieu F., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 100
- 10.1111/1541-4329.12067 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Ayres P., 2008, Proceedings of the eight international conference for the learning sciences, 1, 68
- Baddeley A. D, 1986, Working memory
- 10.1126/science.1736359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.56.11.851 · DOI
- Bralfish O., 1972, Perceived item-difficulty in three tests of intellectual performance capacity (Report No. 29
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.96911.c5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1027//1618-3169.49.2.109 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.014 · DOI
- 10.3389/feduc.2018.00059 · DOI
- 10.2190/MG7X-4J8N-CKYR-P06T · DOI
- 10.1007/s13384-011-0023-y · DOI
- 10.14742/ajet.942 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.042 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Cheng P.-Y., 2014, New horizons in web based learning, 122, 10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_14 · DOI
- Cheng T. S., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 128
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10956-011-9316-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11251-015-9352-y · DOI
- 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3325 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11423-015-9392-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.035 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcal.12086 · DOI
- 10.3102/0002831209340235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00710 · DOI
- 10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.934 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021809.10236.71 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10648-008-9096-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hartman D. K., 2010, The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice, 131
- 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.013 · DOI
- Hsu Y., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 113
- 10.14742/ajet.538 · DOI
- Huang K., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 159
- 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.034 · DOI
- 10.1093/iwc/iwu011 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjet.12129 · DOI
- 10.1177/0735633115621921 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsep.18.1.17 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcal.12078 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.020 · DOI
- Jung J., 2016, Educational Technology and Society, 19, 75
- 10.14742/ajet.1829 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-007-9051-6 · DOI
- 10.1518/001872098779480587 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4 < 351::AID-ACP589>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.126 · DOI
- Kamil M. L., 2009, Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 289
- 10.1037/edu0000013 · DOI
- Klepsch, E. M. & Seufert, T. (2012, April). Subjective differentiated measurement of cognitive load . Paper presented at the fifth International Cognitive Load Theory Conference, Tallahassee, FL.
- 10.1111/medu.13066 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.030 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-017-9404-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.system.2015.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11251-015-9362-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/01443410.2013.860217 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.3123 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11409-015-9149-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13673-017-0089-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/10494820.2016.1155160 · DOI
- Lin J. J. H., 2016, Educational Technology and Society, 19, 47
- List A., 2018, Learning and Instruction, 57, 1, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.004 · DOI
- Lunts E, 2002, Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1, 59
- 10.1080/17452007.2012.683244 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.28945/3568 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.64 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.715 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1021/ed400805p · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.016 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-0663.87.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000893 · DOI
- 10.1111/medu.12732 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11423-017-9511-8 · DOI
- Paas F., 2008, Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning, 11
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-0663.86.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419 · DOI · Paper page
- Paivio A, 1971, Imagery and verbal processes
- Paivio A, 1986, Mental representations: A dual-coding approach
- 10.1002/acp.3100 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.016 · DOI
- Park B., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 24
- 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.022 · DOI
- Park S, 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 211
- 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00741.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.009 · DOI
- 10.2298/ZIPI16002264R · DOI
- Renkl A., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 185
- Ryu J. H., 2009, The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15, 1
- 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11251-014-9328-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.025 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10648-011-9168-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/09297040802220029 · DOI
- Shadiev R., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 53
- 10.1037/edu0000127 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/acp.2884 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:101443480 · DOI
- 10.1037/13273-012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.343 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/000709904322848824 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//1076-898X.3.4.257 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02724980343000189 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.1247 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_10 · DOI
- 10.1080/00461520701756248 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang Z., 2017, Educational Technology and Society, 20, 47
- 10.1111/bjet.12476 · DOI
- Woo J.-C, 2014, Educational Technology and Society, 17, 291
- Yung H. I., 2015, Educational Technology and Society, 18, 70
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review
Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12617 · Cited by 496
“From the CLT perspective, it would be necessary to include other factors in the study design, such as measurements of working memory capacity (Anmarkrud et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review
Bayraktar, D. M., Çoşğun, V., & Altan, T. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618 · Cited by 364
Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review
Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2 · Cited by 348
“For example, the recent systematic reviews focused mainly on the working memory (Anmarkrud et al., 2019), cognitive load (Mutlu-Bayraktar et al., 2019), eye tracking (Alemdag & Cagiltay, 2018), and trends and issues (Li et al., 2019).”
Souchet, A. D., Philippe, S., Lourdeaux, D., & Leroy, L. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1976509 · Cited by 225
“Eye tracking allows collecting several features that are similarly used to investigate both visual fatigue (Park & Mun, 2015) and cognitive load (Anmarkrud et al., 2019).”
MethodKrieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09683-4 · Cited by 167
“For this purpose, CLT proposes design principles for instructional materials and procedures that aim at reducing unnecessary load on working memory and freeing up capacity for learning-related processing (Anmarkrud et al., 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., & Bråten, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Bråten, Ivar
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-83
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2912199704
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 19.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Keywords
- cognitive load, working memory, multimedia learning, academic performance, cognitive load theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review