Cited by 364Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing'

Parguel, Béatrice, Benoit-Moreau, Florence, Russell, Cristel Antonia·2015·International Journal of Advertising

Abstract

This paper examines the ‘executional greenwashing’ effect, defined as the use of nature-evoking elements in advertisements to artificially enhance a brand's ecological image. Using classic models of information processing and persuasion, the research tests whether ‘executional greenwashing’ differs as a function of consumer knowledge about environmental issues in the product category and whether environmental performance information can counterbalance the effect by helping consumers form an accurate evaluation of the brand's ecological image. Three experiments with French consumers reveal that evoking nature does mislead consumers in their evaluation of a brand's ecological image, especially if they have low knowledge of environmental issues. Two indicators of environmental performance, based on current international policies, are tested to counteract ‘executional greenwashing’. Whereas a raw figure is not sufficient to help non-expert consumers revise their judgment, accompanying the figure with a traffic-light label eliminates ‘executional greenwashing’ amongst both experts and non-experts. Theoretical and regulatory implications are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02650487.2014.996116

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1177/002224299706100106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gillespie, E. 2008. Stemming the tide of greenwash. Consumer Policy Review 18, no. 3: 79–83.
  4. 10.2307/1251903 · DOI
  5. Horiuchi, R., and R. Schuchard. 2009. Understanding and preventing greenwash: A business guide. London: Futerra Sustainability Communications.
  6. Orange, E. 2010. From eco-friendly to eco-intelligent. Futurist 44, no. 5: 28–42.
  7. Oslo Symposium on Sustainable Consumption. 1994. Retrieved 5 January 2013 from http://www.iisd.ca/consume/oslo004.html.
  8. 10.1080/00218499.1998.12466580 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., & Russell, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • , ,
  • American University (US)
Corresponding author
Parguel, Béatrice
Venue
International Journal of Advertising
Published
2015-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
107-134
ISSN
  • 0265-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-3948
OpenAlex
W1535652297
Cited by
364
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
21.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Keywords
greenwashing, consumer deception, environmental knowledge, traffic light labels, persuasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review