Cited by 62Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Depersonalization Disorder: A Functional Neuroanatomical Perspective

Open access
Phillips, Mary L., Sierra, Mauricio·2003·Stress

Abstract

Clinical reports of depersonalization suggest that attenuated emotional experience is a central feature of the condition. Patients typically complain of emotional numbness and some patients ascribe their feelings of unreality to a lack of affective "colouring" in things perceived. Recent neuroimaging and psychophysiological studies support these assumptions as they show both attenuated autonomic responses in depersonalization, and decreased activity within neural regions important for the generation of affective responses to emotive stimuli. Furthermore, findings from neuroimaging studies indicate increased prefrontal cortical activity in depersonalised patients, particularly within regions associated with contextualization and appraisal of emotionally-salient information rather than mood induction per se. Taken together, these finding suggest that symptoms of depersonalization, and in particular emotional numbing, may be related to a reversal of normal patterns of autonomic and neural response to emotive stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1025389031000138538

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • States of detachment may be associated with reduced reactivity in the amygdala.

    “States of detachment (e.g., numbing) may thus be associated with reduced reactivity in this area [70].”

    From Dissociation and Alterations in Brain Function and Structure: Implications for Borderline Personality Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [70]

    The sections “Emotional Numbing in Depersonalization” and “Towards an Understanding of the Functional Neuroanatomical Basis of Depersonalization” describe blunted emotional responses and reduced insula activation to aversive scenes in depersonalized patients. They do not establish reduced amygdala reactivity in detachment states; the claim specifies a brain region the reported finding does not support. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mineness can be lost locally, for aspects of bodily functioning, such as pain.

    “What this shows is that “mineness” can be lost locally, for aspects of bodily functioning, such as pain (Phillips et al., 2001; Phillips and Sierra, 2003; Medford et al., 2006; Simeon and Abugel, 2006; Simeon et al., 2008; Stein and Simeon, 2009; Sierra et al., 2012; Michal et al., 2013; Sedeño et al., 2014; Medford et al., 2016; Gogolla, 2017; Gerrans, 2019).”

    From Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account (2020) · cites this paper as Phillips and Sierra, 2003

    The DEPERSONALIZATION section describes somatosensory distortions and a feeling that one's body does not belong to oneself, supporting a loss of bodily ‘mineness.’ The paper's passages about pain concern its neural processing, not a loss of ownership specifically for pain, so that example is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Cahill, L., Haier, R.J., Fallon, J., Alkire, M.T., Tang, C., Keator, D., Wu, J. and McGaugh, J.L. (1996) Amygdala activity at encoding correlated with long-term, free recall of emotional information, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8016-8021.
  2. Gusnard, D.A., Akbudak, E., Sulman, G.L. and Raichle, M. (2001) Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4259-4264.
  3. Lader, M.H. (1975) The Psychophysiology of Mental Illness (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).
  4. Lambert, M.V., Sierra, M., Phillips, M.L. and David, A.S. (2002) The spectrum of organic depersonalization: a review plus four new cases, J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 14, 141 -154.
  5. Morris, J.S., Friston, K.J., Buchel, C., Frith, C.D., Young, A.W., Calder, A.J., et al. (1998a) A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions, Brain 12, 47-57.
  6. Phillips, M.L., Young, A.W., Scott, S.K., Calder, A.J., Andrew, C., Giampietro, V., et al. (1998) Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1809-1817.
  7. Phillips, M.L., Drevets, W.C., Rauch, S.L. and Lane, R.D. (2003a) The neurobiology of emotion perception I: towards an understanding of the neural basis of normal emotion perception, Biol. Psychiatry, In press.
  8. Phillips, M.L., Drevets, W.C., Rauch, S.L. and Lane, R.D. (2003b) The neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for under- standing the neural basis of emotion perceptual abnormalities in schizophrenia and affective disorders, Biol. Psychiatry, In press.
  9. Shorvon, H.J. (1946) The depersonalization syndrome, Proc. R. Soc. Med. 39, 779-792.
  10. Simpson, J.R., Drevets, W.C., Snyder, A.Z., Gusnard, D.A. and Raichle, M.E. (2001) Emotion-induced changes in human medial prefrontal cortex: II. During anticipatory anxiety, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 688 -693.
  11. Sprengelmeyer, R., Rausch, M., Eysel, U.T. and Przuntek, H. (1998) Neural structures associated with recognition of facial expressions of basic emotions, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 265, 1927-1931.
  12. Zald, D.H. and Pardo, J.V. (1997) Emotion, olfaction, and the human amygdala: amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4119-4124.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, M. L., & Sierra, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Mary L.
Venue
Stress
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
157-165
ISSN
  • 1025-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-8888
OpenAlex
W1971502526
Cited by
62
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
depersonalization disorder, emotional numbing, autonomic responses, prefrontal cortex, contextualization, neuroimaging findings
MeSH terms
Affect, Brain, Depersonalization, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review