Cited by 177Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareRisk Perception and ManagementAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A Little Uncertainty Goes a Long Way: State and Trait Differences in Uncertainty Interact to Increase Information Seeking but Also Increase Worry

Rosen, Natalie O., Knäuper, Bärbel·2009·Health Communication

Abstract

This study examines the effect of an interaction between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and situational uncertainty (SU) on worry due to uncertainty and on information seeking. Health providers may benefit from knowing when communicating uncertain information is beneficial. The study was a 2 (IU condition: high vs. low) x 2 (SU condition: high vs. low) experimental design resulting in four conditions to which university students (N = 153) were randomly assigned. IU was manipulated through a linguistic manipulation of responses to an IU questionnaire coupled with written false feedback. SU was manipulated by modifying the information participants read about a fictitious infection. Individuals in the high IU and high SU condition sought the most information and worried most due to uncertainty compared to people in the low IU and low SU condition, who sought the least information and worried least. Findings suggest that high IU may increase positive health behaviors such as screening intentions when individuals are faced with an uncertain health threat, but that it also increases worries due to that uncertainty. Providing opportunities for discussing one's emotional response to uncertainty and providing instrumental support for managing uncertainty (e.g., booking the follow-up appointment) is essential when communicating uncertain information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410230902804125

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosen, N. O., & Knäuper, B.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • McGill University
Corresponding author
Rosen, Natalie O.
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2009-05-04
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
228-238
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W2059131762
Cited by
177
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, situational uncertainty, information seeking, worry, uncertainty communication, health information, health behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Health Behavior, Intention, Uncertainty, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review