The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance
Abstract
The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the impact of speed of processing training on the cognitive and everyday abilities of older adults with initial processing speed or processing difficulty. Participants were randomized to either a speed of processing intervention or a social- and computer-contact control group. Results indicate that speed of processing training not only improves processing speed, as indicated by performance on the Useful Field of View test (UFOV), but also transfers to certain everyday functions, as indicated by improved performance on Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (Timed IADL). Transfer of speed of processing training to other cognitive domains was not evident. This study provides additional evidence that speed of processing training has the potential to enhance everyday functions that maintain independence and quality of life, particularly when the training is targeted toward individuals who most need it. Further study is needed to learn about the long-term effects of such training in relation to everyday abilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,902 · cited 1×
“This training approach arises from the theory that changes in cognitive function with age result from generalized, age-related slowing of processing speed (Birren, Woods & Williams, 1980; Salthouse, 1996).”
Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Smith, D. M., Tennstedt, S. L., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 · Cited by 2,049
Self-citationSpeed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance
Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., Ball, K. K., Wadley, V. G., & Edwards, J. D. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.218.27241 · Cited by 469
Self-citationTraining for attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and old adults.
Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.1.1.50 · Cited by 413
Age Differences in Attitudes Toward Computers
Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/53b.5.p329 · Cited by 380
Transfer of a Speed of Processing Intervention to Near and Far Cognitive Functions
Edwards, J. D., Wadley, V. G., Myers, R. S., Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., & Ball, K. K. (2002) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000065259 · Cited by 208
Self-citationImproved Digit Symbol Substitution by Older Women as a Result of Extended Practice
Beres, C. A., & Baron, A. (1981) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/36.5.591 · Cited by 53
Cited by
Smith, G. E., Housen, P., Yaffe, K., Ruff, R., Kennison, R. F., Mahncke, H. W., & Zelinski, E. M. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02167.x · Cited by 785
Cognitive Training Decreases Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement of Older Drivers
Ball, K., Edwards, J. D., Ross, L. A., & McGwin, Jr. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03138.x · Cited by 256
Self-citationThe useful field of view test: Normative data for older adults
EDWARDS, J., ROSS, L., WADLEY, V, CLAY, O., CROWE, M., ROENKER, D., & BALL, K. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001 · Cited by 231
Self-citationBallesteros, S., Prieto, A., Mayas, J., Toril, P., Pita, C., Ponce de León, L., Reales, J. M., & Waterworth, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00277 · Cited by 189
Wadley, V. G., Okonkwo, O., Crowe, M., & Ross-Meadows, L. A. (2008) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.jgp.0000310780.04465.13 · Cited by 187
Self-citationNoack, H., Lövdén, M., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2009) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2009-0496 · Cited by 180
Tetlow, A. M., & Edwards, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0051-2 · Cited by 69
Self-citationEffects of processing speed training on cognitive functions and neural systems
Takeuchi, H., & Kawashima, R. (2012) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2012-0035 · Cited by 67
Use It—and Keep It, Longer, Probably: A Reply to Salthouse (2006)
Schooler, C. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00026.x · Cited by 58
Gates, N. J., Rutjes, A. W., Di Nisio, M., Karim, S., Chong, L.-Y., March, E., Martínez, G., & Vernooij, R. W. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012278.pub2 · Cited by 46
Cognitive Training in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.
(2016) · PubMed · doi:10.3967/bes2016.046 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, J. D., Wadley, V. G., Vance, D. E., Wood, K., Roenker, D. L., & Ball, K. K.
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 262-271
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2002963113
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
