Cited by 152Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sleep disorders in African Americans and Caucasian Americans: a meta-analysis

Ruiter, Megan E., DeCoster, Jamie, Jacobs, Lindsey, Lichstein, Kenneth L.·2010·Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Previous research suggests that ethnic groups differ in the prevalence and severity of disordered sleep symptoms. This study used meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of ethnic differences between African Americans (AAs) and Caucasian Americans (CAs) in insomnia symptoms and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). It also used moderator analyses to explore the variability in these effect sizes. Thirteen studies measuring insomnia symptoms and 10 studies measuring SDB met inclusion criteria and represented thousands of adult AAs and CAs. Results indicate AAs have a higher prevalence and greater severity of SDB, but CAs report more insomnia symptoms. These results indicate a need for a multi-ethnic approach to the assessment and treatment of sleep disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15402002.2010.509251

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • African-Americans were more likely to have sleep disordered breathing, of greater severity, compared to Whites.

    “Regarding sleep disorders, Ruiter and colleagues(226) found that African-Americans were more likely to have sleep disordered breathing, of greater severity, compared to Whites.”
  • Sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea may be more common, go undiagnosed more frequently and may be treated less efficaciously in African American patients.

    “sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be more common, go undiagnosed more frequently and may be treated less efficaciously in African American patients [18, 19]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiter, M. E., DeCoster, J., Jacobs, L., & Lichstein, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Published
2010-09-23
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
246-259
ISSN
  • 1540-2002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-2010
OpenAlex
W2023920590
Cited by
152
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep disorders, ethnic differences, African Americans, White Americans, insomnia symptoms, sleep-disordered breathing, prevalence, symptom severity, racial disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Wake Disorders, United States, Prevalence, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review