Cited by 651Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchOptical Coherence Tomography Applications

Near-infrared optical properties of ex vivo human skin and subcutaneous tissues measured using the Monte Carlo inversion technique

Simpson, C Rebecca, Kohl, Matthias, Essenpreis, Matthias, Cope, Mark·1998·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

The absorption and transport scattering coefficients of caucasian and negroid dermis, subdermal fat and muscle have been measured for all wavelengths between 620 and 1000 nm. Samples of tissue 2 mm thick were measured ex vivo to determine their reflectance and transmittance. A Monte Carlo model of the measurement system and light transport in tissue was then used to recover the optical coefficients. The sample reflectance and transmittance were measured using a single integrating sphere 'comparison' method. This has the advantage over conventional double-sphere techniques in that no corrections are required for sphere properties, and so measurements sufficiently accurate to recover the absorption coefficient reliably could be made. The optical properties of caucasian dermis were found to be approximately twice those of the underlying fat layer. At 633 nm, the mean optical properties over 12 samples were 0.033 mm(-1) and 0.013 mm(-1) for absorption coefficient and 2.73 mm(-1) and 1.26 mm(-1) for transport scattering coefficient for caucasian dermis and the underlying fat layer respectively. The transport scattering coefficient for all biological samples showed a monotonic decrease with increasing wavelength. The method was calibrated using solid tissue phantoms and by comparison with a temporally resolved technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/43/9/003

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, C. R., Kohl, M., Essenpreis, M., & Cope, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
2465-2478
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2029141895
Cited by
651
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 31
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
Keywords
near-infrared optical properties, human skin, dermis, subcutaneous adipose tissue, muscle, absorption coefficient, reduced scattering coefficient, Monte Carlo inversion, optical transmittance, wavelength dependence, tissue phantoms
MeSH terms
Biophysics, Female, Humans, Infrared Rays, Models, Biological, Monte Carlo Method, Scattering, Radiation, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Skin Pigmentation, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Muscle, Skeletal, Dermis, Biophysical Phenomena, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review