Cited by 251Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Cropland/pastureland dynamics and the slowdown of deforestation in Latin America

Open access
Graesser, Jordan, Aide, T Mitchell, Grau, H Ricardo, Ramankutty, Navin·2015·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Latin America has the planet's largest land reserves for agriculture and had the most rapid agricultural expansion during the twenty-first century. A large portion of the expansion replaced forests, as shown by many local and regional studies. However, expansion varied regionally and also replaced other land covers. Further, it is important to distinguish between changes in cropland and pastureland as they produce food at different levels of efficiency and intensity. We used thirteen years (2001–2013) of MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer satellite imagery to characterize cropland and pastureland expansion at multiple scales across Latin America. From 2001 to 2013, 17% of new cropland and 57% of new pastureland replaced forests throughout Latin America. Cropland expansion from 2001 to 2013 was less (44.27 Mha) than pastureland (96.9 Mha), but 44% of the 2013 cropland total was new cropland, versus 27% of the 2013 pastureland total, revealing higher regional expansion rates of row crop agriculture. The majority of cropland expansion was into pastureland within core agricultural regions of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Uruguay. On the contrary, pastureland largely expanded at frontiers, such as central Brazil, western Paraguay, and northern Guatemala. As others have suggested, regional agriculture is strongly influenced by globalization. Indeed, we find an overall decrease in agricultural expansion after 2007, coinciding with the global economic slowdown. The results illustrate agricultural cropland and pastureland expansion across Latin America is largely segregated, and emphasize the importance of distinguishing between the two agricultural systems, as they vary in land use intensity and efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034017

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Brazilian Amazon frontier becomes fully integrated into the formal market economy as well as in a globalized and increasingly consolidated agri-food system, where a few traders dominate.

    “It becomes fully integrated into the formal market economy as well as in a globalized and increasingly consolidated agri-food system, where a few traders dominate (Graesser et al., 2015;Reis et al., 2024).”

    From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Graesser et al., 2015

    Section 4.2, “Drivers of agricultural change” (page not provided), describes export-oriented agriculture, global economic influences, and supply chains in the Brazilian Amazon. It does not say the frontier is fully integrated into the formal market economy or that a few traders dominate a consolidated agri-food system. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Foley J A et al 2011 Solutions for a cultivated planet Nature 478 337-42 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J and Befort B L 2011 Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 20260-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Deininger K and Byerlee D 2012 The rise of large farms in land abundant countries: do they have a future? World Dev. 40 701-14 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, da Fonseca G A and Kent J 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 403 853-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ramankutty N, Gibbs H K, Achard F, Defries R, Foley J A and Houghton R 2007 Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation Glob. Change Biol. 13 51-66 · DOI
  6. Saatchi S S et al 2011 Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 9899-904 · DOI
  7. Wright S 2010 The future of tropical forest species Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1195 1-27 · DOI
  8. DeFries R S, Houghton R A, Hansen M C, Field C B, Skole D and Townshend J 2002 Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 14256-61 · DOI
  9. Karstensen J, Peters G P and Andrew R M 2013 Attribution of CO 2 emissions from Brazilian deforestation to consumers between 1990 and 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024005 · DOI
  10. Grau H R, Gasparri N I and Aide T M 2005 Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north- west Argentina Environ. Conservation 32 140-8 · DOI
  11. Laurance W F 2007 Switch to corn promotes Amazon deforestation Science 318 1721-1721 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Walker R, Browder J, Arima E, Simmons C, Pereira R, Caldas M, Shirota R and Zen S d 2009 Ranching and the new global range: Amazônia in the 21st century Geoforum 40 732-45 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bianchi C A and Haig S M 2013 Deforestation trends of Tropical Dry Forests in central Brazil Biotropica 45 395-400 · DOI
  14. Brown J C, Koeppe M, Coles B and Price K P 2005 Soybean production and conversion of tropical forest in the Brazilian Amazon: The case of Vilhena, Rondôpnia AMBIO: A J. Hum. Environ. 34 462-9 · DOI
  15. Pacheco P 2009 Agrarian change, cattle ranching and deforestation: assessing their linkages in southern Pará Environ. Hist. 15 493-520 · DOI
  16. Rudorff B F T, Adami M, Aguiar D A, Moreira M A, Mello M P, Fabiani L, Amaral D F and Pires B M 2011 The Soy Moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images Remote Sens. 3 185-202 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Müller R, Müller D, Schierhorn F, Gerold G and Pacheco P 2012 Proximate causes of deforestation in the Bolivian lowlands: an analysis of spatial dynamics Reg. Environ. Change 12 445-59 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marsik M, Stevens F R and Southworth J 2011 Amazon deforestation: rates and patterns of land cover change and fragmentation in Pando, northern Bolivia, 1986-2005 Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 353-74 · DOI
  19. Grau H R, Aide T M and Gasparri N I 2005 Globalization and soybean expansion into semiarid ecosystems of Argentina AMBIO: A J. Hum. Environ. 34 265-6 · DOI
  20. Zak M R, Cabido M, Cáceres D and Díaz S 2008 What drives accelerated land cover change in central Argentina? synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic, and technological factors Environ. Manage. 42 181-9 · DOI
  21. Richards P D 2011 Soy, cotton, and the final Atlantic Forest frontier Prof. Geogr. 63 343-63 · DOI
  22. Caldas M M, Goodin D, Sherwood S, Campos Krauer J M and Wisely S M 2015 Land-cover change in the Paraguayan Chaco: 2000-2011 J. Land Use Sci. 10 1-18 · DOI
  23. Huang C et al 2009 Assessment of Paraguayʼs forest cover change using Landsat observations Glob. Planet. Change 67 1-12 · DOI
  24. Etter A, McAlpine C, Wilson K, Phinn S and Possingham H 2006 Regional patterns of agricultural land use and deforestation in Colombia, Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 114 369-86 · DOI
  25. Portillo-Quintero C, Sanchez A, Valbuena C, Gonzalez Y and Larreal J 2012 Forest cover and deforestation patterns in the Northern Andes (Lake Maracaibo Basin): a synoptic assessment using MODIS and Landsat imagery Appl. Geogr. 35 152-63 · DOI
  26. Roy Chowdhury R 2006 Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels Appl. Geogr. 26 129-52 · DOI
  27. López-Carr D 2012 Agro-ecological drivers of rural out- migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala Environ. Res. Lett. 7 045603 · DOI
  28. Pacheco P, Aguilar-Støen M, Börner J, Etter A, Putzel L and Diaz M D C V 2010 Landscape transformation in Tropical Latin America: assessing trends and policy implications for REDD+ Forests 2 1-29 · DOI
  29. Richards P D, Myers R J, Swinton S M and Walker R T 2012 Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America Glob. Environ. Change 22 454-62 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Martinelli L A and Filoso S 2008 Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges Ecol. Appl. 18 885-98 · DOI
  31. Gasparri N, Grau H and Gutierrez Angonese J 2013 Linkages between soybean and neotropical deforestation: coupling and transient decoupling dynamics in a multi-decadal analysis Glob. Environ. Change 23 1605-14 · DOI
  32. Macedo M N, DeFries R S, Morton D C, Stickler C M, Galford G L and Shimabukuro Y E 2012 Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 1341-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Friedl M A, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A and Huang X 2010 MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets Remote Sens. Environ. 114 168-82 · DOI
  34. Blanco P D et al 2013 A land cover map of Latin America and the Caribbean in the framework of the SERENA project Remote Sens. Environ. 132 13-31 · DOI
  35. Giri C and Long J 2014 Land cover characterization and mapping of South America for the year 2010 using Landsat 30 m satellite data Remote Sens. 6 9494-510 · DOI
  36. Aide T M, Clark M L, Grau H R, López-Carr D, Levy M A, Redo D, Bonilla-Moheno M, Riner G, Andrade-Núñez M J and Muñiz M 2013 Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001-2010) Biotropica 45 262-71 · DOI
  37. Hansen M C et al 2008 Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 9439-44 · DOI
  38. Clark M L, Aide T M and Riner G 2012 Land change for all municipalities in Latin America and the Caribbean assessed from 250 m MODIS imagery (2001-2010) Remote Sens. Environ. 126 84-103 · DOI
  39. Breiman L 2001 Random Forests Mach. learn. 45 5-32 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Mueller N D, West P C and Foley J A 2012 Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation Nat. Commun. 3 1293 · DOI
  41. Urioste M 2012 Concentration and foreignisation of land in Bolivia Can. J. Dev. Stud. 33 439-57 · DOI
  42. Macchi L, Grau H R, Zelaya P V and Marinaro S 2013 Trade- offs between land use intensity and avian biodiversity in the dry Chaco of Argentina: a tale of two gradients, agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 174 11-20 · DOI
  43. Cassidy E S, West P C, Gerber J S and Foley J A 2013 Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare Environ. Res. Lett. 8 034015 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ceddia M G, Bardsley N O, Gomez-y Paloma S and Sedlacek S 2014 Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 7242-7 · DOI
  45. Castiblanco C, Etter A and Aide T M 2013 Oil palm plantations in Colombia: a model of future expansion Environ. Sci. Policy 27 172-83 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Laurance W F, Sayer J and Cassman K G 2014 Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature Trends Ecol. Evol. 29 107-16 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Nepstad D et al 2014 Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains Science 344 1118-23 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Brown J C, Rausch L and Gronau Luz V 2014 Toward a spatial understanding of staple food and nonstaple food production in Brazil Prof. Geogr. 66 249-59 · DOI
  49. McAlpine C A, Etter A, Fearnside P, Seabrook L and Laurance W 2009 Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: a call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil Glob. Environ. Change 19 21-33 · DOI
  50. Pacheco P 2012 Soybean and oil palm expansion in South America: a review of main trends and implications CIFOR Working Paper 90 (Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research CIFOR)
  51. Bernard E, Penna L and Araújo E 2014 Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil Conservation Biol. 28 939-50 · DOI
  52. Galeano L A 2012 Paraguay and the expansion of Brazilian and Argentinian agribusiness frontiers Can. J. Dev. Stud. 33 458-70 · DOI
  53. Leguizamón A 2014 Modifying Argentina: GM soy and socio- environmental change Geoforum 53 149-60 · DOI
  54. Laurance W F, Goosem M and Laurance S G 2009 Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 659-69 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Licker W F, Johnston M, Foley J A, Barford C, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C and Ramankutty N 2010 Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the yield gap of croplands around the world? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19 769-82 · DOI
  56. Mueller N D, Gerber J S, Johnston M, Ray D K, Ramankutty N and Foley J A 2012 Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management Nature 490 254-7 · DOI
  57. Arvor D, Jonathan M, Meirelles M S P, Dubreuil V and Durieux L 2011 Classification of MODIS EVI time series for crop mapping in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil Int. J. Remote Sens. 32 7847-71 · DOI
  58. Galford G L, Mustard J F, Melillo J, Gendrin A, Cerri C C and Cerri C E 2008 Wavelet analysis of MODIS time series to detect expansion and intensification of row-crop agriculture in Brazil Remote Sens. Environ. 112 576-87 · DOI
  59. Roy D P, Ju J, Kline K, Scaramuzza P L, Kovalskyy V, Hansen M, Loveland T R, Vermote E and Zhang C 2010 Web- enabled Landsat data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States Remote Sens. Environ. 114 35-49 · DOI

Authors
Graesser, J., Aide, T. M., Grau, H. R., & Ramankutty, N.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR)
  • National University of Tucumán (AR)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Graesser, Jordan
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
034017
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162912845
Cited by
251
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 6
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • National Science Foundation: (0709598)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
cropland expansion, agricultural expansion, land use change, row crop agriculture, agricultural frontier, globalization, global economic slowdown, land use intensity, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review