Cited by 94Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Pathways of chronic pain in survivors of intimate partner violence

Open access
Wuest, Judith, Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn, Merritt-Gray, Marilyn, Wilk, Piotr, Campbell, Jacquelyn C., Lent, Barbara, Varcoe, Colleen, Smye, Victoria·2010·Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the roles of lifetime abuse-related injury, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity, and depressive symptom severity in mediating the effects of severity of assaultive intimate partner violence (IPV), psychological IPV, and child abuse on chronic pain severity in women survivors of IPV. METHODS: Structural equation modeling of data from a community sample of 309 women survivors of IPV was used to test partial and full theoretical models of the relationships among the variables of interest. RESULTS: The full model had good fit and accounted for 40.2% of the variance in chronic pain severity. Abuse-related injury, PTSD symptom severity, and depressive symptom severity significantly mediated the relationship between child abuse severity and chronic pain severity, but only abuse-related injury significantly mediated the relationship between assaultive IPV severity and chronic pain severity. Psychological IPV severity was the only abuse variable with significant direct effects on chronic pain severity but had no significant indirect effects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can inform clinical care of women with chronic pain in all areas of healthcare delivery by reinforcing the importance of assessing for a history of child abuse and IPV. Moreover, they highlight the relevance of routinely assessing for abuse-related injury and PTSD and depressive symptom severity when working with women who report chronic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2009.1856

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other neuroimaging work has highlighted maladaptive activity or connectivity in the amygdala.

    “Other neuroimaging work has highlighted maladaptive activity or connectivity in the amygdala 396, 398, 399.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [10]10. Coker A, Smith P, Fadden MP. Intimate partner violence and disabilities. J Womens Health 2005;14:829-838.
  2. [38]38. Parker B, McFarlane J. Nursing assessment of the battered pregnant woman. Am J Matern Child Nurs 1991;16:161-164.
  3. [56]56. Carr D, Goudas L. Acute pain. Lancet 1999;353:2051-2058.
  4. [9]9. assessment of four different forms of abuse. Violence Women 2008;14:634-654.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., Wilk, P., Campbell, J. C., Lent, B., Varcoe, C., & Smye, V.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • The University of Western Ontario, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
  • Western University (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Wuest, Judith
Venue
Journal of Women's Health
Published
2010-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1665-1674
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W2086085337
Cited by
94
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (10605_4)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042854)
  • Institute of Gender and Health (15156, 106054)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
chronic pain, intimate partner violence, women survivors, post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive symptoms, child abuse, psychological violence, assaultive violence, mediation, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Battered Women, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review