Cited by 661Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStress Responses and CortisolChild Abuse and Trauma

Cortisol and post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Meewisse, Marie-Louise, Reitsma, Johannes B., De Vries, Giel-Jan, Gersons, Berthold P. R., Olff, Miranda·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has inconsistently been associated with lower levels of cortisol. Aims: To compare basal cortisol levels in adults with current PTSD and in people without psychiatric disorder. Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (SMD) in basal cortisol levels were calculated and random-effects models using inverse variance weighting were applied. Results: Across 37 studies, 828 people with PTSD and 800 controls did not differ in cortisol levels (pooled SMD = −0.12, 95% C1= −0.32 to 0.080). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies assessing plasma or serum showed significantly lower levels in people with PTSD than in controls not exposed to trauma. Lower levels were also found in people with PTSD when females were included, in studies on physical or sexual abuse, and in afternoon samples. Conclusions: Low cortisol levels in PTSD are only found under certain conditions. Future research should elucidate whether low cortisol is related to gender or abuse and depends on the measurement methods used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024877

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have suggested that women's monthly hormonal fluctuations sensitize the HPA-axis.

    “Some studies have suggested that women's monthly hormonal fluctuations sensitize the HPA-axis (73, 74).”

    From Where Sex Meets Gender: How Sex and Gender Come Together to Cause Sex Differences in Mental Illness (2022) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Gender section says women appear to have a more sensitised HPA axis than men. It does not attribute that difference to monthly hormonal fluctuations; the Study characteristics section mentions menstrual cycle only as a factor for which few studies matched participants. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have found increased or no differences in basal glucocorticoid levels in individuals with PTSD.

    “However, studies have also found increased or no differences in basal glucocorticoid levels (Meewisse et al, 2007) and diurnal cortisol rhythms in individuals with PTSD (Freidenberg et al, 2010;Maes et al, 1998)”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Meewisse et al, 2007

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports no overall difference in basal cortisol between adults with PTSD and controls across 37 studies. It does not establish increased basal levels; the subgroup findings reported in Main findings are lower levels in some comparisons. The paper measures cortisol specifically, rather than basal glucocorticoids generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hypocortisolemia has been widely reported in PTSD, but findings are mixed.

    “Hypocortisolemia has also been reported widely in PTSD; however, here too the findings have been mixed5.”

    From Neurobiology of resilience (2012) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meewisse, M.-L., Reitsma, J. B., De Vries, G.-J., Gersons, B. P. R., & Olff, M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Meewisse, Marie-Louise
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-11
Volume
191
Issue
5
Pages
387-392
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1990652217
Cited by
661
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 35
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, cortisol, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, trauma exposure, physical abuse, sexual abuse, sex differences, plasma cortisol, serum cortisol, diurnal cortisol rhythm
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Circadian Rhythm, Depression, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review