The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 10,101–10,200 of 12,257
The Abandonment and Evolving Legacies of the English Common Law in the United States
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0008
Strengthening the Citizen-Victim’s Role Within a Public Conception
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0011
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0002
A Private and Novel Conception Under the United States’ Federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0009
From Citizens to Private Entities
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0007
Cultura de la calidad e inclusión educativa:
Millar, G. Z. (2026) · Espila · doi:10.61454/6vsnxt69
A Typology of Victim Participation Across Private–Public Conceptions
Manikis, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.003.0003
Digital Health Humanity for Universal Health Coverage
Matsumoto, E., & Andrès, F. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1330-6.ch006
Inclusive Innovation and a Participatory Future
Stojčić, N. (2026) · Applied innovation and technology management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14900-8_8
Garneau, A. B., Ward, C. L., Lavoie, P., Petiquay-Dufresne, J., Bélisle, M., Smylie, D., & Nepton, C. (2026) · International Medical Education · doi:10.3390/ime5010018
Takae, K., & Tanaka, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2394-8_28
Empathy and Ethos: Care Ethics and Virtue Epistemology in Non-Ideal Worlds
Dalmiya, V. (2026) · Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09411-7_6
Ball, D. (2025) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onaf030
5 Mapping the educational experiences of LESLLA learners from their homelands to Australia
Kempster, J. R. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111403878-006
173Kulturelle Anosmie in exotischen Geruchswelten
Diaconu, M. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111396040-009
Toward Establishing Intellectual Receptivity as an Epistemic Good
Iizuka, R. (2026) · Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09411-7_10
Enacting Epistemic Respect: Reconciling Care and Respect
Miyahara, K. (2026) · Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09411-7_14
What Makes Academic Writing Human(e)
Molinari, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009572859.006
Seeing with others: Participatory media, spectatorship, and the afterlife of representation
Abazeri, M. (2026) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437261417434
10. Etterord – rådgivning i komplekse velferdskontekster
Ness, O. (2026) · Universitetsforlaget eBooks · doi:10.18261/9788215070575-26-10
Selective Humanitarianism: Western Media Bias and the Silencing of Gaza
Doğutaş, A. (2026) · TRT Akademi · doi:10.37679/trta.1827180
Epistemic injustice in the clinical care of practitioners of Afro-Brazilian religions
Porcher, J. E., & Santaella, F. J. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2623889
Decolonizing Spiritual Inclusion
April, K. A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76750-0_263
Review of the Book ‘Under the Gaze of Global Mental Health: A Critical Reflection’
Mosto, D. D., & Negrogno, L. (2026) · Culture Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-026-09970-7
As fragments of a vessel: On anonymisation and the ethics of clinical case writing
Lingiardi, V., & Liotti, M. (2025) · The International Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/00207578.2025.2585387
Galbraith, E. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05946-8_15
The Ethics of Developing Social Structural Explanations of Injustice
Gâlgău, C. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2610495
Schenke, K. C., Foster, J., & Stephens-Lewis, D. (2026) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053251410690
Stereotypes and Forms of Injustice. A Non-atomistic Analysis
Martino, V., & Onnis, E. (2026) · Gender, justice and legal feminism · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63905-0_3
Still Inessential—Women with Disabilities, (Gender) Stereotypes, and Law
Bernardini, M. G. (2026) · Gender, justice and legal feminism · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63905-0_6
Women Before the Law in Italy: A Picture from the CEDAW Committee’s View in the Case A. F. v. Italy
Boiano, I. (2026) · Gender, justice and legal feminism · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63905-0_15
On Being “Blameless Among One’s Contemporaries”
Arpaly, N. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197510926.003.0032
Wong, D. B. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197510926.003.0013
Why committing epistemic injustice against close friends can be distinctively bad
Surtees, G. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05449-5
Sobre dos variantes de desobediencia civil transnacional
Trelles, J. E. S. (2026) · Daímon · doi:10.6018/daimon.528061
Morality and Epistemic Rationality
Stroud, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197510926.003.0024
Poonia, M., & Dixit, S. (2025) · Towards Excellence · doi:10.37867/te170334
Trust-based beneficence and relational autonomy in neonatal ethics
Can, E., Karakurt, Y., & Gök, Ç. C. (2026) · Bioethics News · doi:10.1007/s40592-026-00282-5
Maurya, S. K. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2752-5.ch017
Self-fulfilling testimonial injustice
de Bruin, B. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.10052
Challenging epistemic injustices in the 2020 Environmental Performance Index: an engagement
Ballesteros-Figueroa, J. A. (2025) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2025.2537956
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0008
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0007
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0009
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0003
Lima, L. D. S. (2026) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764251411847
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0001
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0005
Not Saying That On Preventing Communication
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0006
Krones, T., & Sauer, T. (2026) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-026-00902-y
Endogenous innovation and change: community agency in two case studies in Ghana
Peddi, B., Kwoyiga, L., Ludwig, D., & Dessein, J. (2026) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2026.2619223
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0004
Castillo, A., Castrillón, P. A., López-Erazo, L. J., Mónica Patricia Caicedo, V., Tamayo, L. A., Ascanio, M. M., Borda, J. P., & Lasso, E. (2026) · Public Health in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2026.100742
Challenges and Future Directions
Rocco, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2251-4_11
Public Goods Governance and Management
Rocco, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2251-4_7
McGowan, M. K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197837320.003.0002
Flanagan, B., Fitzpatrick, D., McEwan, T., Debes, H., & Nudell, N. G. (2026) · Paramedicine · doi:10.1177/27536386261421198
Mechanistic Reasoning In-School Versus Mechanistic Reasoning In-Life
Stowe, R. L., Russ, R. S., & Wells, L. B. (2026) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10246-1_12
Democracy Distorted – Deepfakes as Political Weapons
Rakipi, G., Yousefi, Y., Caltagirone, C., Tumminelli, A., McIntyre, A., & Dimitrova, A. (2026) · doi:10.18690/um.feri.2.2026.5
Bentouhami-Molino, H. (2026) · Cahiers du Genre · doi:10.3917/cdge.079.0225
Psychiatrie et sciences sociales
Benarab, A. (2026) · Le Journal des psychologues · doi:10.3917/jdp.420.art026
Computational Basis of Large Language Models’ Decision Making in Social Simulation
Ma, J. (2026) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1177/00811750261421220 · Cited by 1
Epistemic suicide: self-inflicted knowledge suppression and the African development predicaments
Dimonye, S. C., & Okeke, N. M. (2026) · African Identities · doi:10.1080/14725843.2026.2628127
Reclaiming voice: poetry as identity repair in the works of Dalit women poets
KAUSHIK, M. (2026) · Journal of Poetry Therapy · doi:10.1080/08893675.2026.2629542
The Garden and the Necropolis: Ethics as Pilgrimage from the Buddha to the Posthuman
Hawkins, J. N. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17020221
Power and Paradox in Mental Health Social Work: Mapping the Terrain
Whitaker, L., Reid, K., Tseris, E. J., Ballingall, H., Borg, A., Jones, B., Olsen, A., Pitt, A., & Thorpy, L. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in social work · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08306-7_2
Examining Mental Health Social Work: From Power Analysis to Practice
Whitaker, L., Reid, K., Tseris, E. J., Ballingall, H., Borg, A., Jones, B., Olsen, A., Pitt, A., & Thorpy, L. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in social work · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08306-7_1
Shute, T. (2026) · Advances in mental health and addiction · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10166-2_3
Whitaker, L., Reid, K., Tseris, E. J., Ballingall, H., Borg, A., Jones, B., Olsen, A., Pitt, A., & Thorpy, L. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in social work · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08306-7_3
Khan, N. A., Coventry, P. A., Ali, H., Fulbright, H., & Brown, J. V. E. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109567
The phantom cells: an autoethnography of medical uncertainty, bodily betrayal and loss
Vaughton, L. (2026) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-01-2026-0033
Lightfoot, S., Kia, H., Foran, E., Gifford, W., O’Byrne, P., & Vandyk, A. D. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2026.2628316
Cultivating the Creativity of Neurodivergent Thinking
Moynihan, C. D. (2026) · Aigne Journal · doi:10.33178/aigne.vol11.c5
Refugee Status Determination in Brazil: Enacting Injustice
de Castro, F. R. (2026) · Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · doi:10.1080/15562948.2026.2629337
Patton, C. (2026) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494251407557
A pedagogy of the assessed: On knowing between credential and conviction
Zukowski, I. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2625025
Advancing Management Knowledge and Practice in Africa: A Decolonial Perspective
Adekoya, O. D., Ajonbadi, H. A., & Mordi, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14851-3_6
Ferreira, C. S., & Ribeiro, M. A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.12.26346209
Conceptual economics Contra conceptual engineering
Podosky, P. C. (2026) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2026.2617389
377Rebuilding Knowledge: Epistemology and Knowledge Organization for Information Practice
Kelly, M. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111346519-020
A Primer on Epistemic Injustice and Patients with Non-English Language Preference
Chipman, S. A., Meagher, K. M., Felder, R. M., & Barwise, A. K. (2026) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/739005
Lanteigne, I., Lavoie, L., Savoie, E., Albert, H., & Breau, J. (2025) · Recherches féministes · doi:10.7202/1122780ar
Schneider, J., & Godrie, B. (2025) · Recherches féministes · doi:10.7202/1122785ar
Shifting the Paradigm: Inclusive Plurilingual Education as a (Re)positioning Journey
Guarda, M. (2026) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16440-7_8
Estudios sobre injusticia epistémica: una revisión sistemática de la literatura académica en español
Aguilar, I. E. G., Eraña, Á., Manus, S. G. M., Murguía, A., Jerade, M., Lozano, M. V., Lozano, A. F., Lozano, H. D. V., Velásquez, D. M. R., Palafox-Hernandez, A. F., et al. (2025) · Crítica (México D F En línea) · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761
Temps compté, temps valorisé : enjeux éthiques de la quantification du travail des consultants
Stenger, S., Laszczuk, A., & Bourgoin, A. (2026) · Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit · doi:10.3917/cca.pa.0002
Uştuk, Ö., & Selvi, A. F. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6253747
du Mérac, É. R., & Favella, A. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70518
Lewis, K. R., Taylor, K., Watson, T. L., & Cummings, J. L. (2026) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968261424937
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.002.0003
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.002.0005
Invisible and unheard: epistemic injustice at the intersection of migration and disability
Dibia, C. H., & Dibia, C. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2629891
Paschen, J. (2026) · Geo Geography and Environment · doi:10.1002/geo2.70060
Trauma-informed narrative inquiry: A dual-role method for reflexive, relational research
Ramaswamy, D. (2026) · Methodological Innovations · doi:10.1177/20597991261420416
Pandit, N. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197828915.003.0007
Carlson, M. (2026) · Action in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/01626620.2026.2628168
Pandit, N. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197828915.001.0001
Home in the Shadow of Violence
Pandit, N. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197828915.003.0004
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
