The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 10,501–10,600 of 12,257
Trans-Babelism Theory: English, AI, and the Transformation of Global Linguistic Order
Tran, H.-N. (2026) · Southeast Asian Conference on Arts & Humanities (SEACAH) · doi:10.22492/issn.2760-5698.2026.14
Porrovecchio, A. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2663439
Forever young, forever helpable: The performative submissiveness catch in juvenile courts
Cohen‐Rimer, Y. (2026) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639261441761
Shan, H., & Yoo, J. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s40955-026-00335-6
Ylhäinen, M., & Mustasaari, S. (2025) · Retfærd · doi:10.18261/ret.48.1.5
Mähringer, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-06014-3_59-1
Restorying Ageing: Amplifying Older Women’s Voices Through Creative Life Writing
Schrage-Früh, M., O’Neill, M., & Hanrahan, K. (2026) · Life Writing · doi:10.1080/14484528.2026.2659095
Adewojo, A. A., Ogbonna, O. P., Nallah, B. J., & Fadare, C. D. (2026) · African Identities · doi:10.1080/14725843.2026.2661070
Ameh, S. S., & Emmanuel, N. O. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8816392/v1
Beyond Mistrust: A Semi-Systematic Review of Black Women’s Health Care Decision-Making
Sledge, R., Williams, S.-L. L., Granger, D. D., & Knight, J. (2026) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-026-02984-2
Secrecy: An Epistemological Account
Navarro, J. S. (2026) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.70047
Almashour, M., Aldamen, H. A. K., & Jarrah, M. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1800770
Affective self-respect and affective injustice
Edlich, A. (2026) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-026-02526-w
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0002
Shrestha, H. L., Shrestha, L., Rosich, R., Splaine, M., & Petahtegoose, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1800362
How Do We Understand Other Minds?
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0004
Eneev, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6544538
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0001
Roelofs, L. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.001.0001
Is Empathy a Good Basis for Morality?
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0006
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0019
Fragkaki, M., & Κρασά, Μ. (2026) · Advances in wireless technologies and telecommunication book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1190-6.ch001
What Does Imaginative Simulation Justify?
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0003
Chin, S. (2026) · Journal of Universal Language · doi:10.22425/jul.2026.27.1.1
Hermanussen, C., & Uda, S. K. (2026) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70072
Roelofs, L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197519967.003.0005
Algorithmic Bias and AI: A Humanities Perspective
P, A. M. (2026) · The Review of Contemporary Scientific and Academic Studies · doi:10.55454/rcsas.6.04.2026.001
Shan, Y., & Pan, N. (2026) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-026-01453-z
Davies, S., Mohamed, A. K. A., Bahri, R., Elmubarak, A., Turner, E., & Wright, P. (2026) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/bjb.2026.10234
Developing an evidence‐based model to implement co‐governance
Bates, S. M., Smyth, C., Katz, I., Li, B., & Haigh, F. (2026) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.70041
Professionalism and communication policy in motorsport: language, legitimacy, and ethics
Rodriguez-Armendariz, A. G. (2026) · International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics · doi:10.1080/19406940.2026.2663095
Academic Spaces, Invisible Harms
Parmar, M. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4903-9.ch010
Ashmore, L., Stewart, H., Kragh-Furbo, M., Hutton, D., Salisbury, L., Singleton, C., & Singleton, V. (2026) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057261444152
do Carmo, R. F. R., Rodrigues, A. A. D. B., de Moura, J. M. G., Silva, C. A., de Oliveira, C. D., da Mata, P. T., Neto, J. A., da Costa, M. O., & Soldati, G. T. (2026) · Ethnobiology and Conservation · doi:10.15451/ec2026-04-15-10-1-17 · Cited by 1
An epistemology of inclusion for nursing: Lessons from male infertility
Abdullahzadeh, M. (2026) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330261424356
Vlachou, A., Tsermidou, L., & Andreou, E. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2659097
Moving Beyond the Poles: A Larger Space for Respect in Bioethics?
Galvagni, L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10422-9_14
Conditionality, Reciprocity, and Capabilities
Rossiter, E. (2026) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15255-8_12
45„Ihr Körper wurde noch nie verletzt“
Fallis, D. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783112238653-003
23Chapter 3 Rethinking Innovation in Developing Countries: Tailored Strategies for Latin America
Almanzar, A. D. R. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111630120-003
Allix-Desfautaux, E., & Luca, V. D. (2026) · International Conference on Gender Research · doi:10.34190/icgr.9.1.4651
Conspiracy Hinges, Delusions, and Mystical Experiences
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0016
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0007
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0009
Hysteria, Hermeneutical Injustice, and Conceptual Engineering
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0012
Reyes, A. M. T. (2026) · Páginas de Educación · doi:10.22235/pe.v19i1.5003
Huang, J. (2026) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/742027
Hinges and Common and Procedural Knowledge
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0004
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0001
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.002.0005
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0013
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0015
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0017
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0003
The logic trap: How LLM “Helpfulness” becomes a mechanism of psychological harm
Sophia, F. P. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01148-6
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0008
Hinges, Prejudices, and Testimonial Injustice
Coliva, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834022.003.0011
Young female offenders in context: adversity, mental health and risk in a community forensic sample
Coyle, A., Rodriguez, C., Busse, A., & Marshall, S. (2026) · Journal of Forensic Practice · doi:10.1108/jfp-07-2025-0072
Valkenburg, Z. V. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6598760
Parsapoor, A., & Sayyah, M. (2026) · Case Reports in Psychiatry · doi:10.1155/crps/3752206
From Fiction to Fiduciary: Reframing AI Trust in Mental Healthcare
Yang, Y. T. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2645574
Chen, Y.-N. K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6669055
Quist, F., Dwamena, E., & Acquah, S. (2026) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2026.2664966
Zhang, Y., & Mbah, M. F. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18094378
Yildiz, G. (2026) · Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1821139
Centering Survivor Agency in AI for Violence Prevention
Conrad, A. (2026) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/742111
Heffernan, K., Cesnales, N. I., Lane, M., & Wood, J. I. (2026) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2026.2658515
Rethinking Tribal Education: From Alienation to Localization through National Education Policy 2020
Gadilkar, A., & Set, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21339-6_5
Strategies for sustainable multilingual education across HEIs: insights from the legacy of BAQONDE
Álvarez-Mosquera, P., Nosilela, B., Motinyane, M., Seshoka, K., & Mngadi, K. (2026) · Educational Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eduling-2025-0029
Sassaro, M. (2026) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2026.2654812
(Ph.D), U. N. N. (2026) · Niger Delta Journal of Philosophy & African Values · doi:10.66286/ndjop.cim015w9
Differential Disruption and Epistemic Injustice
Hopster, J. K. G., & Proost, M. D. (2026) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-026-00257-3
Fradelos, Ε. C., & Tzavella, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1853323
La clinica riscopre la giustizia sociale: il Power Threat Meaning Framework
Bessone, M., & Sassoon, M. (2026) · RICERCA PSICOANALITICA · doi:10.4081/rp.2026.1137
Countering the Narrative of Gender Diverse Youth in Heartbreak High and Sex Education
Meek, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14843-8_5
Documentary film in medical ethics education: Take Care of Maya as a resource for ethical reflection
Řebíková, B. (2026) · International Journal of Ethics Education · doi:10.1007/s40889-026-00242-x
Lopes, D. M. (2026) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2026.2659882
Managing People and Algorithms
Bose, V., Shanmugam, V., Srinivas, M., Perumal, D., Kannirajalingam, T., & Karthikkumar, C. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6390-5.ch011
Obstetric Violence in the Spanish Prison Context: A Feminist Bioethical Approach
Jubany-Roig, P., & Guijarro, E. M. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2025-0018
Heilinger, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-06014-3_36-1
Naming the familiar: The power of emancipatory terms
Maiese, M. L. (2026) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-026-10157-z
Manhire, R., & Salskov, S. A. (2026) · Philosophical Investigations · doi:10.1111/phin.70029
Exploring temporal-hermeneutical (in)justice in the Øyfjellet wind power development
Ellingsen, H. S. (2026) · Time & Society · doi:10.1177/0961463x261446699
Alanazi, B., & Alsaleh, A. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11030073
Loftis, S. F. (2026) · Literary disability studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08897-0_11
Elhinnawy, H. (2026) · Palgrave studies in race, inequality and social justice in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14335-8_1
From Division to Dialogue: AI-Mediated Peacebuilding in Turkey’s Digital Conflict Narratives
Uzunoğlu, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16800-9_9
Bjartveit, C. J., Henderson-Dekort, E., DeCecco, E., & Bagshaw, A. (2026) · Journal of Childhood Studies · doi:10.18357/jcs512202621879
I Love Us For Real: Black Mother Leadership and Early Learning Spaces
Fearon, S. (2026) · Journal of Childhood Studies · doi:10.18357/jcs512202621974
Ioannidis, C. (2026) · Journal of Child Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/0075417x.2026.2638387
Welbeck, E. E. S., & Kudzordzi, D. D. (2026) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-01-2025-0035
Examining diversity, equity and inclusion policies in academic publishing through a decolonial lens
Wendt, S. P. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Ethnography · doi:10.1108/joe-09-2025-0124
English language education as public and education policies
Terasawa, T. (2026) · Language Problems & Language Planning · doi:10.1075/lplp.25025.ter
Inclusivity in AI-Enhanced Democracy
Edmond, J., Mariani, I., Sacco, S., Rizzo, F., Concilio, G., Ojanen, A., Björk, A., Manias, G., Papageorgiou, X. S., Kalantzis, N., et al. (2026) · Springer series in design and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23948-8_6
Eight-Dimensional Persuasive Respect and the Walter Sobchak Fallacy
Marshall, C. R. (2026) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-026-10427-0
Eneev, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6565019
Social Media Algorithm and the Moderation of Vulgarity in Political Text: An Afrocentric Perspective
Motingwa, O., Motsamai, G. C., Mokgothu, P. W., & Mathe, L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09629-6_12
Psikoterapide sosyal adalet yaklaşımı: Türkiye bağlamında olası etik sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri
Demirci, S., & Kaya, C. (2026) · Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi · doi:10.57127/kpd.26024438.1803644
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
