The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 6,701–6,800 of 12,257
On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction ModelPreprint
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05598 · Cited by 2
Trotter-Simons, B.-E. (2023) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.24667824 · Cited by 1
Gaakeer, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_989 · Cited by 1
Alkemade, E., Deeg, N., Almiñana, C. G., Khan, S. N., Hernández, O. M., Delgado, A. N., Schure, E., Whittle, M., & Wouters, H. (2023) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-023-09660-7 · Cited by 1
Praeliminierende Ungerechtigkeit
Goldbeck, E. (2023) · doi:10.47952/gro-publ-190 · Cited by 1
Participatory Dialogues in Landscapes of Care
Aussems, K. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.546 · Cited by 1
Kröger, L. C. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.547 · Cited by 1
Lived experience evidence in disability policy making
Williams, K. (2024) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · doi:10.54454/20240307 · Cited by 1
Engaging knowers in the design and implementation of digital health innovations
Henry, S. B. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae051 · Cited by 1
Thomson, G., & Gill, S. R. (2024) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111240596-010 · Cited by 1
Negotiating the nature of water- and miningscapes
Schoderer, M. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.560 · Cited by 1
DifficultyPreprint
Hendrickx, M. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9v8pf · Cited by 1
Harrison, R. (2024) · International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/02662426241259959 · Cited by 1
Urban Living Labs in times of post-pandemic epistemic injustices: a speculative realist revisionPreprint
Pijpers, K. (2024) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rh6fc · Cited by 1
Gerolin, E. C. (2024) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.48.2024.tde-25072024-110515 · Cited by 1
Materialised and Imagined Urban Connectivity
Kristensen, N. G. (2024) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · doi:10.54337/aau738875064 · Cited by 1
Limitations of Patient-Physician Co-Reasoning in AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems
Kostick, K. M., & Ayaz, S. S. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2377124 · Cited by 1
Anti-Racism in Clinical Ethics Fellowships: Rising to the Occasion
Dougherty, R., Hossain, F., & Mukherjee, D. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2388760 · Cited by 1
Thinking Through How Race, Disability, and Gender Work Together
Garland‐Thomson, R., & Valentine, D. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2388994 · Cited by 1
Introduction for special issue on “Excellence, diversity, and the philosophy exception”
Jenkins, F., & Catala, A. (2024) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12588 · Cited by 1
Autoethnography in language education: Tensions, characteristics, and methods
Lu, X. (2024) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-024-10116-3 · Cited by 1
Trans Autistic Experiences of Gender-Affirming Care in Ontario
Jacobsen, K. V. G. (2024) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16318 · Cited by 1
Barton, B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56681-3_6 · Cited by 1
Biomedical, Neurodiverse, and Mad Affinities: The Constraints of Collective Epistemic Resources
Respess, S., & D’Alessandro, A. (2025) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2024.2438047 · Cited by 1
Invisible Advocates: The Gendered Burden of Autism Care in KazakhstanPreprint
Foster, F., Kanderzhanova, A., Tolegenova, A., Tazhibay, M., Colet, P. C., Stolyarova, V., & Noble, J. G. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5268068 · Cited by 1
Just Knowledge and Treatment: Formal and Epistemic Injustice in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care
Jackson, G. R., Moses, J. D., & Campo‐Engelstein, L. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2497988 · Cited by 1
Mavroudis, I. A., ALEXIOU, P., Petridis, F., & Ciobica, A. S. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6843432/v1 · Cited by 1
Reinhardt, K. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394238651.ch19 · Cited by 1
Listening is a tool for health equity, not just a soft skill
Dhairyawan, R. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.r1164 · Cited by 1
Fisher, E., MacLennan, K., Mullally, S. L., Rodgers, J., & Tzemou, E. (2025) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/849gd_v1 · Cited by 1
Extended Will, Epistemic Care, and Motivational Barriers to Care
Shussett, D., & Respess, S. (2025) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2025.2519456 · Cited by 1
Cleverly, C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5359658 · Cited by 1
AI-Driven Health Messaging and Epistemic Justice in the Global South
Addie, Y. O., & McNealy, J. E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0195 · Cited by 1
When I Sing, I Think Brighter: Neurodivergence and the Performing Arts
Crown, N. J. (2025) · Journal of Infant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/15289168.2025.2527150 · Cited by 1
The Coming Epistemological Crisis and the Revival of Philosophy in EducationPreprint
Gerardi, B. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5353770 · Cited by 1
Mahajan, P. T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5386814 · Cited by 5
Chirima, R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7384456/v1 · Cited by 2
Recontextualizing SFL in EAP: Enhancing Critical Literacy in the Age of Generative AIPreprint
Chen, D., & Liu, X. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5549074 · Cited by 1
The Credibility Economy and Its Limits
Worsnip, A. (2025) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anaf067 · Cited by 1
Setter, J. E., Dovchin, S., & Ramjattan, V. A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.002.0008 · Cited by 1
The Role of Farmers and the Place of Their Knowledge in European Agro Living Labs. A ReviewPreprint
gentiletti, M. G., Barcellini, F., & Chizallet, M. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7818061/v1 · Cited by 1
That's (Also) Racist! Entity Type Pluralism, Responsibility, and Liberatory Norms
Davidson, L. J. (2019) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · doi:10.25394/pgs.8985791 · Cited by 1
Downs, J. L. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01523-y · Cited by 1
AI Psychotherapy and Epistemic Harms
Pozzi, G. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2608633 · Cited by 1
Musa, M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8749108/v1 · Cited by 1
Mariyono, D. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8437389/v1 · Cited by 1
Identité narrative et justice ethnoculturelle. L’exemple israélien
Tommasi, J. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/abc3116bz1083z4f21zbb20z400b85f41cb7 · Cited by 1
Dorion, L. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/66f27d60zafddz44e3z9a90za37acf12d690 · Cited by 1
Berthelot-Raffard, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197852668.003.0022 · Cited by 1
Extractivist Boundary Work in Sápmi
Mels, T. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945222.003.0232 · Cited by 1
Autenrieth, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0246 · Cited by 1
Epistemic injustice in sports medicine: framing return-to-play beyond hard data
Gandini, S., & Sesa, G. (2026) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2026-111587 · Cited by 1
Acevedo, H., AL-Louzi, R., Celi, L. A., Chowdhury, M., Hernandez‐Boussard, T., Hendl, T., Kabede, A. A., Lucas, M. M., & Savary, M. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2690955 · Cited by 1
Thorne, S. E. (2026) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/17449871261495480 · Cited by 1
Speech Acts and Silencing: A Social Account of Speech Action and Restrictions on Speech
Johnson, C. R. (2015) · OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 1
Dhunpath, R. (2026) · Transformation in Higher Education · doi:10.4102/the.v11i0.800
Dark, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1826284
Cabañeros, J. S. (2026) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-026-02790-4
Küçükuncular, A. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02318-5 · Cited by 1
TAN, K. H. (2026) · International Journal of Law Management & Humanities · doi:10.63108/ijlmh.12783
Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project
(2026) · University of Maribor Press · doi:10.18690/um.feri.2.2026
Lecturer and PhD Scholar University of Fiji, F. I., & Sharma, D. (2026) · International journal of social sciences, language and linguistics · doi:10.55640/ijssll-06-02-02
Department of Philosophy Research Center for Culture, A., & Alvarez-Abarejo, C. J. (2025) · Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.25138/19.1.a2 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Epistemic Outsourcing and Epistemic Corruption
Dacles, N. (2026) · Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.46992/pijp.27.2.a.11
Virginia Woolf and The Judicial ImaginationPreprint
Bradley, J. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2184185
The milestones project : how ex-offenders may collectively negotiate reentry barriers
Balliro, M. S. (2011) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Meijer, D. J. W. (2015) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Epistemología Social y democracia deliberativa
Lores, A. M. (2014) · Acta Sociológica · doi:10.1016/s0186-6028(14)70477-3
Christine Battersby and the Law
Richardson, J. (2011) · Women a Cultural Review · doi:10.1080/09574042.2011.561118
The state, the activists and the islanders. Language policy on Corsica
Riley, P. (2010) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434630903497996
Kant et le renouveau de la pratique « analytique » dans la philosophie contemporaine
Anderson, P. S. (2012) · Théorèmes · doi:10.4000/theoremes.290
Lean, S. (2012) · Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling)
The Epistemic Relevance of the Virtue of Justice
Clem, S. D. (2013) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-013-9433-6
8.1 Hermeneutics of Linguistic Ethnography: Teachers and Students Losing and Finding Their Voices
Davis, R. A. (2014) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_69
Facilitating positive counselling outcomes for clients with an intellectual disability
Raffensperger, M. K. (2010) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/9594
Grass-fed Meats: Peri-urban Rancher Strategies to Resist Dispossession in the San Francisco Bay Area
Amirebrahimi, J., & Strategies, P.-U. R. (2013)
The Contribution Of Ecofeminism Philosophy In Environmental Management Research
Ismail, H., Hussain, T. P. R. S., & Subhan, M. (2016) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1s1p335
Cracking the Code: Navigating and Subverting Dominant Class Rule in Computer Science and Engineering
Carrigan, C. M. (2013) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Some Key Topics in Feminist Philosophies of Science: An Introduction
Amoretti, M. C., & Vassallo, N. (2015) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9_1
Northway, R. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.13048
The Power of Social Imaginaries: Fact, Fiction, and the Politics of Knowledge
Code, L. B. (2010) · Trans-Humanities · doi:10.1353/trh.2010.0001
Giving an account of oneself amongst others: Hegel, Judith Butler and social ontology
Disley, L. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139626682.015
La réappropriation de la démocratie : vers de nouvelles formes de participation politique
Zamora, J. S. (2016) · Participations · doi:10.3917/parti.013.0205
Negotiating the ethics of trust and addiction in chronic pain management
Buchman, D. Z. (2014) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0103409
The Success of Skillfully Knowing
Padilla, M. A. (2013)
The Receiving Function: Ethics, Communication, and Reading
Schweickart, P. P. (2008) · Reception Texts Readers Audiences History · doi:10.5325/reception.1.1.0024
Journaling engagements with literature on racism: a critical race theoretic approach
Conradie, M. S., & Brooks, M. (2015) · African Identities · doi:10.1080/14725843.2015.1128804
Tesitmony as Significance Negotiation
Epp, J. F. (2016) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Nature, feminism, and flourishing: Human nature and the feminist ethics of flourishing
Harvey, C. D. (2016) · e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)
Restructuring Intellectual Authority: Affective Democratic Friction
Sayles-Hannon, S. J. (2015) · Philosophy of education · doi:10.47925/2015.522
A Small But Important Point About e-Books and Academic Referencing
Papanikitas, A. N., & McKenzie-Edwards, E. (2015) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2015.11494328
PERFORMATIVITY, SOCIAL ONTOLOGY, AND THE USES OF NARRATIVES IN LATIN AMERICA
Márquez, I. (2015) · Comparative Philosophy An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy · doi:10.31979/2151-6014(2015).060109
Politicologie 2.0: Gender in het kerncurriculum
Bonjour, S., Mügge, L. M., & Roggeband, C. (2016) · Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies · doi:10.5117/tvgn2016.2.bonj
Shared Ethnography of Shared Cities
Potts, R., Sharma, D., & Lindley, J. (2015) · Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1111/1559-8918.2015.01042
Barbieri, W. A. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137263254_7
Toward a Theory of Constitutive Justice
Barbieri, W. A. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137263254_8
Chappell, S. G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684854.003.0013
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
