The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 6,301–6,400 of 12,257
Telling tales from the queer periphery: heteronormative discourses in Australian primary schools
Milenkovic, J., & Vicars, M. (2025) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2025.2479670 · Cited by 2
Orphanopoulos, C. M. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16040448 · Cited by 1
Historical and Cultural Contexts of Non-Recent Institutional Abuses on the Island of Ireland
McAlinden, A., Keenan, M., & Gallen, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191967399.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Black Gaze Cinema in Portugal: a transnational counterpublic against erasure
Pereira, A. C. (2025) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2025.2478570 · Cited by 3
What is the characteristic wrong of testimonial injustice?
Pettigrew, R. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf034 · Cited by 1
Critical Contextual Empiricism for Busy People: Scientific Argumentation as Epistemic Exchange
Novaes, C. D., & Dede, Ç. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10198-0 · Cited by 1
Spaulding, S. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.13 · Cited by 1
Addressing organisational elder abuse using the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework
Drolet, M.-J., Gaudet, R., Lord, M.-M., Pageau, F., Viscogliosi, C., Genesse, J. C., & Whiteford, G. E. (2025) · Journal of Occupational Science · doi:10.1080/14427591.2025.2463685 · Cited by 1
Gaza: an indictment of critical philosophy
MacKenzie, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2502382 · Cited by 1
Inference and the Presentational Conception of Knowing
Sylvan, K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0009 · Cited by 1
Humanising Universities through Ubuntu
Oelofsen, R., & Mqalo, S. (2025) · Utafiti · doi:10.1163/26836408-15020113 · Cited by 1
An Artist’s Voice: Expressive Achievement, Experiential Content, and Authority
León, M. J. A. (2024) · The British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayae058 · Cited by 1
Deliberative methods for cultural ecosystem services
Khirfan, L. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003414896-29 · Cited by 1
Martínez, V. A., & Villarreal, A. (2025) · Communication and Democracy · doi:10.1080/27671127.2025.2486168 · Cited by 1
Non-epileptic attack disorder (NEAD): trauma and life events, context and meaning
Peacock, M., Bissell, P., Reuber, M., Gray, C., Grünewald, R. A., & Dickson, J. M. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100578 · Cited by 1
Rouat, S., & Castel, D. (2024) · Le travail humain · doi:10.3917/e.th.874.0241 · Cited by 1
Cudina, J. N., & Mejía-Castro, A. F. (2025) · Revista de historia de la psicología · doi:10.5093/rhp2025a13 · Cited by 1
Shaw, M., & Barry, T. L. (2025) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979251322950 · Cited by 4
Rudick, C. K., Dobosh, M. A., & Sullivan, A. D. O. (2025) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2025.2505906 · Cited by 1
Justice enablers of climate-health adaptation in South America
Rekers, R., Gerbaldo, M. V., Yabar, C. A., Garat, C. D. R., & Rekers, L. (2025) · The Journal of Climate Change and Health · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100459 · Cited by 1
The introduction of AI into OpenNotes and the prospects for dialogue
Murphy, J. W., & Miles, C. I.-A. (2025) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101059 · Cited by 1
Faugère, C. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6070147 · Cited by 2
Bullock, L. (2025) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxaf032 · Cited by 1
Communal philosophy? A possible framework for academia-community interaction
Silver, Y., & Shavit, A. (2025) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.010 · Cited by 1
The Testimonial Double Bind for Disabled People
Hiller, A. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2525227 · Cited by 1
The Eternal Allure of the Panacea: How Narratives and Biases Sustain Pseudocures
Bacchi, A. D. (2025) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10912-025-09971-4 · Cited by 1
Hynes, D., & Dreher, T. (2025) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x251359743 · Cited by 1
dos Santos, A. (2025) · Nordic Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1080/08098131.2025.2525566 · Cited by 1
Connection and Complexity: On Two Kinds of Social Injustice and Responsibility
Hope, P. B. (2024) · Phenomenology and Mind · doi:10.17454/pam-2703 · Cited by 1
Cooper, L. (2025) · DIY Alternative Cultures & Society · doi:10.1177/27538702251360939 · Cited by 1
Les enjeux du consentement dans un contexte d’inaptitude : une étude de la portée
Royer-Tremblay, G., & Gonin, A. (2025) · Canadian social work review · doi:10.7202/1119014ar · Cited by 1
Li, D., Xu, G., & Qin, J. F. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103795 · Cited by 2
Storytelling through long COVID
Löwy, I., & Segata, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197778982.003.0013 · Cited by 1
Ncube, M. (2025) · JORMA International Journal of Health and Social Sciences · doi:10.64074/qwtkrn56 · Cited by 1
Moving Towards Design Justice Through Multivocal Design in Health Education
Dilkes, D., & Casserly, C. S. (2025) · The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Journal · doi:10.18357/otessaj.2024.4.3.85 · Cited by 1
The Problem (and the Value) of Radical Moral Disagreement
Lyreskog, D. M., Wilkinson, D. J. C., Atuire, C., Farrell, M., Francis, E., Harrison, M., Kingori, P., Savulescu, J., Singh, I., & Parker, M. J. (2025) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24721.1 · Cited by 1
Three short stories of kidney disease in South Africa
Richards, R. (2025) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1683 · Cited by 1
AI may be systematically adversarial to adversarial cooperation
Burns, T. F. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2025-111196 · Cited by 1
‘Navigating the Fog’: A reflection on epistemic injustice in epilepsy treatment and care
Keikelame, M. J. (2025) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1698 · Cited by 1
Singular Vulnerability: Notes on the Apprehension of Precarious Life
Huzar, T. J. (2025) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksaf083 · Cited by 1
Sperling, D., & Hleihel, N. N. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251385439 · Cited by 1
Elections for direction, sortition for judgment: a new model of bicameral democracy
Bruzzone, V. (2025) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2025.2576945 · Cited by 1
Uehling, M. (2025) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100559 · Cited by 1
Khazai, Z., Muntinga, M. E., & Verdonk, P. (2025) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2025.2574000 · Cited by 2
Belief in Evidence in the Nineteenth-Century Novel
Baker, G. A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198944409.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Work-related suicide: an international social justice perspective
Bittle, S., Waters, S., Mills, C., & Lerouge, L. (2025) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-025-10237-2 · Cited by 1
Sarkar, D., & Roy, D. (2025) · Gender Studies · doi:10.2478/genst-2025-0006 · Cited by 1
Baines, D., & Brown, C. G. (2025) · Studies in Political Economy · doi:10.1080/07078552.2025.2475663 · Cited by 1
Novaes, C. D. (2025) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/15d8k · Cited by 1
Countering the Pathologies of Recognition
Casuso, G. (2025) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/15d8i · Cited by 1
Yan, Q., Alharbi, M. H., Deebani, W., & Liu, Y. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70425 · Cited by 1
Baleige, A., & Goï, C. (2023) · L’Année de la recherche en sciences de l’éducation · doi:10.3917/arse.231.0074 · Cited by 1
Gupta, V., Syrett, S., Gumley, A. I., Hardy, A., Ward, T., & Allan, S. (2026) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.25581.1 · Cited by 1
Reframing AI Literacy: Epistemic Injustice, Generational Concerns, and Perceived Well-Being
Kanoh, H. (2025) · International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT) · doi:10.1145/3761843.3761844 · Cited by 1
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Researching to Transgress: The Epistemic Virtue of Research With
Nastasi, A. W. (2012) · Philosophy of education · doi:10.47925/2012.258 · Cited by 1
STENGEL, B. S. (2012) · Philosophy of education · doi:10.47925/2012.389 · Cited by 1
PETER J. KING AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL CANON: AN AFRICANIST APPRECIATION
Lamola, M. J. (2018) · Phronimon · doi:10.25159/2413-3086/3812 · Cited by 1
Jones, W. E. (2010) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2010.5712506 · Cited by 1
Horsthemke, K. (2014) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2014.890278 · Cited by 1
El rol de las heurísticas sociales en la deliberación
Navarro, M. G. (2015) · Bajo Palabra · doi:10.15366/bp2015.10.009 · Cited by 1
Shuster, D. J. (2012) · UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Feminist empiricism and the livestock industry
David, K. L. (2014) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 1
Agostino, A., & Dübgen, F. (2014) · Leviathan · doi:10.5771/0340-0425-2014-2-267 · Cited by 1
Three Kinds of Moral Imagination
Chappell, S. G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684854.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Trafford, J. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47205-8_4 · Cited by 1
Valadez-Blanco, O., & Manus, F. G. M. (2014) · Metatheoria – Revista de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia · doi:10.48160/18532330me5.136 · Cited by 1
Intersex: Intersectionality, Epistemic and Structural Violence
Carpenter, M. (2015) · Cited by 1
(2008) · Ethics Place & Environment · doi:10.1080/13668790802048357 · Cited by 1
De l’intervention à l’action : nouvelles avenues d’inclusion des communautés LGBTQI
Côté, I., Charlebois, J. B., & Bouchard, G. (2016) · Nouvelles pratiques sociales · doi:10.7202/1039171ar · Cited by 1
QUASI-EVIDENTIALISM: INTERESTS, JUSTIFICATION AND EPISTEMIC VIRTUE
Freedman, K. L. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2015.66 · Cited by 1
Addressing Barriers to Deliberative Participation in Adaptive Preference Interventions
Longair, H. (2017) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2017.1320419 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Sensibility: Third Dimension of Virtue Epistemology.
Belbase, S. (2012) · Cited by 1
Buffam, B. (2017) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2017.1354043 · Cited by 1
Landweer, H., & Newmark, C. (2017) · Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie · doi:10.1515/dzph-2017-0032 · Cited by 1
Politics of Knowledge in Community-Based Work
Peralta, K. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61557-8_6 · Cited by 1
Kantian Ethics, Well-Being, and Disability
Flanigan, J. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95303-5_6 · Cited by 1
Teaching and Learning Philosophical “Special” Topics: Black Feminism and Intersectionality
Gines, K. T., Ranjbar, A. M., O’Byrn, E., Ewara, E., & Paris, W. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65789-9_8 · Cited by 1
On being and care. Joining the conversation on the symmetries/asymmetries of human–thing relations
Rizvi, U. Z. (2017) · Archaeological Dialogues · doi:10.1017/s1380203817000174 · Cited by 1
‘Reflections on Little Rock’ and Reflective Judgment
Palazzi, F. (2017) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2017.1392258 · Cited by 1
The seeing place: Talking theatre and medicine
Bowman, D., & Bowman, J. (2018) · Arts and Humanities in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1474022217732873 · Cited by 1
What Really Matters to Patients? Digital Storytelling as Qualitative Research
Haigh, C. A., & Miller, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64146-1_17 · Cited by 1
Vidmar, I. (2017) · Synthesis philosophica · doi:10.21464/sp32115 · Cited by 1
Transgressions, Demosprudence, and Justice
Baxi, U. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7557-5_2 · Cited by 1
Western and/or universal social sciences?
Széll, G. (2018) · Asian Journal of German and European Studies · doi:10.1186/s40856-018-0029-6 · Cited by 1
Cassam, Q. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198826903.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Genealogia epistêmica e normas de credibilidade
Santos, B. R. G. (2018) · Sofia · doi:10.47456/sofia.v7i1.19387 · Cited by 1
Disruption, Technology, and Time
Walker, A. M. (2018) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3272973.3272976 · Cited by 1
Constructing a global theology: An assessment of the Christian dogmatics of Veli‐Matti Kärkkäinen
Urvas, S., & Vainio, O. (2018) · Dialog · doi:10.1111/dial.12439 · Cited by 1
Nacionalidade e democracia: pensando com e contra Marilena Chaui
Dalaqua, G. H. (2018) · Intuitio · doi:10.15448/1983-4012.2018.2.31912 · Cited by 1
Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant?
Ballantyne, A., & Schaefer, G. O. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105318 · Cited by 1
Unwillingness and Imagination in Frederick Douglass'sThe Heroic Slave
Bennett, N. (2019) · The Review of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0034670519000020 · Cited by 1
Filosofía de las ciencias sociales: ¿Para qué?
Aguilar, I. E. G. (2019) · Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales · doi:10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.236.63526 · Cited by 1
"Forget About Justice:" Survivance and Resistance in Teacher Education
Vásquez, R. (2019) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 1
Is Inquiry Learning Unjust? An Ethical Defense of Deweyan Instructional Design
Tanchuk, N. (2019) · doi:10.7916/d8-9evz-qq73 · Cited by 1
Samaržija, H. (2018) · Croatian Journal of Philosophy · Cited by 1
Implicit Bias, Colorblindness and Institutional Racism
Mitchell, M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/53k9-yd21 · Cited by 1
Between Perspectives: Narratives, Lived Experience, and Culture
Junior, O. D. D. S., Leal, E. M., & Muñoz, N. M. (2019) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2019.0024 · Cited by 1
Koggel, C. M. (2019) · Ética, economía y bienes comunes · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
