The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Abstract
The diffusion and rapid evolution of new communication technologies has created a pressing need to understand the complex forces reshaping media and politics. Who is emerging as powerful in this new context? Written by a leading scholar in the field, this book provides a new, holistic interpretation of how political communication now works. In The Hybrid Media System Andrew Chadwick reveals how political communication is increasingly shaped by interactions among older and newer media logics. Organizations, groups, and individuals in this system are linked by complex and ever-evolving relationships based on adaptation and interdependence. Chadwick shows how power is exercised by those who create, tap, and steer information flows to suit their goals, and in ways that modify, enable, and disable the agency of others across and between a range of older and newer media settings. The [CE1][NN2]book examines a range of examples of this systemic hybridity in flow in political communication contexts ranging from news making in all of its contemporary “professional” and “amateur” forms, to parties and election campaigns, to activist movements and government communication. Compelling stories bring the theory to life. From American presidential campaigns to WikiLeaks, from live prime ministerial debates to hotly contested political scandals that evolve in real time, from historical precedents stretching back five hundred years to the author's unique ethnographic data gathered from recent insider fieldwork among journalists, campaign workers, bloggers, and activist organizations, this wide-ranging book maps the emerging balance of power between older and newer media technologies, genres, norms, behaviors, and organizational forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3144139 · Cited by 1,222
Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., et al. (2017) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 · Cited by 974
Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817724170 · Cited by 738
Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12087 · Cited by 570
Kreiss, D., & MCGREGOR, S. C. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814 · Cited by 398
Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness
Ananny, M. (2016) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915606523 · Cited by 395
Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation
Boulianne, S. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650218808186 · Cited by 383
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign
Keller, F. B., Schoch, D., Stier, S., & Yang, J. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888 · Cited by 378
“Social media also have the potential to set the news agenda (Chadwick, 2013; Neuman, Guggenheim, Jang, & Bae, 2014) as journalists pay close attention to social media buzz (Lukito et al.”
BackgroundMisinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.003 · Cited by 284
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305116664221 · Cited by 188
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817744390 · Cited by 155
Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1945938 · Cited by 119
Karpf, D. (2017) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1316675 · Cited by 83
Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests
Spaiser, V., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Russmann, F., & Helbing, D. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288 · Cited by 77
Witnessing in the new memory ecology: Memory construction of the Syrian conflict on YouTube
Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815604618 · Cited by 71
Earl, J. (2018) · The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9781119168577.ch16 · Cited by 68
Berg, S., & Hofmann, J. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.4.1612 · Cited by 64
Between Mainstream and Alternative – Co-orientation in Right-Wing Populist Alternative News Media
Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12 · Cited by 57
The Theory of Hypermediation: Anti-Gender Christian Groups and Digital Religion
Evolvi, G. (2022) · Journal of Media and Religion · doi:10.1080/15348423.2022.2059302 · Cited by 55
Twitter and Television in a Hybrid Media System: The 2013 Italian election campaign
Marchetti, R., & Ceccobelli, D. (2016) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1040051 · Cited by 32
Contesting #StopIslam: The Dynamics of a Counter-narrative Against Right-wing Populism
Poole, E., Giraud, E., & de Quincey, E. (2019) · Open Library of Humanities · doi:10.16995/olh.406 · Cited by 30
Masip, P., Suau, J., & Ruiz-Caballero, C. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i4.3146 · Cited by 25
Dourado, T., & Salgado, S. (2021) · The Communication Review · doi:10.1080/10714421.2021.1981705 · Cited by 23
“The current connotation of fake news has emerged as part of a disintermediated and fragmented social media environment and in a context of low trust in political institutions (Chadwick, 2013; Hermida, 2010; Humprecht, 2018; Salgado, 2018 ; Van Aelst et al., 2017).”
BackgroundThe Role of Personality in Political Talk and Like-Minded Discussion
Boulianne, S., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2022) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161221994096 · Cited by 23
Jiménez-Martínez, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220923984 · Cited by 22
Exploring the Challenges of Generative AI on Public Sector Communication in Europe
Lovari, A., & De Rosa, F. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9644 · Cited by 22
Adam, S., Häussler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., & Reber, U. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819855966 · Cited by 19
Super-amplifiers! The role of Twitter extended party networks in political elections
Yoon, N., Hemsley, J., Smith, A., Simpson, E., & Eakins, J. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.295 · Cited by 18
Bucy, E. P., & Groshek, J. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817709281 · Cited by 12
(2024) · doi:10.3390/socsci13050266 · Cited by 11
Redefining Publics: Mosireen, State Crime and the Rise of a Digital Public Sphere
Kasm, S. (2018) · State Crime Journal · doi:10.13169/statecrime.7.1.0100 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chadwick, A.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-09-03
- OpenAlex
- W4210996135
- Cited by
- 1,550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.