The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research
Open accessAbstract
Drawing on a specific scenario from a contemporary workplace, I review some of the dominant ways that management scholars have addressed technology over the past five decades. I will demonstrate that while materiality is an integral aspect of organisational activity, it has either been ignored by management research or investigated through an ontology of separateness that cannot account for the multiple and dynamic ways in which the social and the material are constitutively entangled in everyday life. I will end by pointing to some possible alternative perspectives that may have the potential to help management scholars take seriously the distributed and complex sociomaterial configurations that form and perform contemporary organisations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Self-citationOrlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Self-citationTrist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607081138 · Cited by 3,248
Self-citation10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Self-citationBarley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
Technologies, texts and affordances.
Hutchby, I. (2001) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/s0038038501000219 · Cited by 2,012
Cited by
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392
The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts1
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.02 · Cited by 780
The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network
Pagani, M., & Pardo, C. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.009 · Cited by 618
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13747 · Cited by 576
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y · Cited by 448
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178
The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work
Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998105 · Cited by 171
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10 · Cited by 121
Hislop, D., Axtell, C., Collins, A., Daniels, K., Glover, J., & Niven, K. (2015) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.10.001 · Cited by 83
Greenhalgh, T., Swinglehurst, D., & Stones, R. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02390 · Cited by 71
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., Papoutsi, C., Vijayaraghavan, S., & Stones, R. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16093 · Cited by 63
Phygital customer journey: a practice-based approach
Mele, C., Di Bernardo, I., Ranieri, A., & Russo Spena, T. (2024) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-08-2023-0102 · Cited by 53
Jacob, C., Sanchez-Vazquez, A., & Ivory, C. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/13555 · Cited by 46
Digital analytics in professional work and learning
Edwards, R., & Fenwick, T. (2016) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2015.1074894 · Cited by 30
Revising the “science of the organisation”: Theorising AI agency and actorhood
van Rijmenam, M., & Logue, D. (2021) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2020.1816833 · Cited by 30
Islam, N., Mäntymäki, M., & Turunen, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.556 · Cited by 24
(2014) · Electronic Journal of e-Government · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W. J.
- Venue
- Cambridge Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-141
- ISSN
- 0309-166X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3545
- OpenAlex
- W1965827746
- Cited by
- 963
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 116.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
