Cited by 140Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Can the macro beat the micro? Integrated information across spatiotemporal scales

Open access
Hoel, Erik P., Albantakis, Larissa, Marshall, William, Tononi, Giulio·2016·Neuroscience of Consciousness

Abstract

Causal interactions within complex systems such as the brain can be analyzed at multiple spatiotemporal levels. It is widely assumed that the micro level is causally complete, thus excluding causation at the macro level. However, by measuring effective information—how much a system’s mechanisms constrain its past and future states—we recently showed that causal power can be stronger at macro rather than micro levels. In this work, we go beyond effective information and consider additional requirements of a proper measure of causal power from the intrinsic perspective of a system: composition (the cause–effect power of the parts), state-dependency (the cause–effect power of the system in a specific state); integration (the causal irreducibility of the whole to its parts), and exclusion (the causal borders of the system). A measure satisfying these requirements, called ΦMax, was developed in the context of integrated information theory. Here, we evaluate ΦMax systematically at micro and macro levels in space and time using simplified neuronal-like systems. We show that for systems characterized by indeterminism and/or degeneracy, Φ can indeed peak at a macro level. This happens if coarse-graining micro elements produces macro mechanisms with high irreducible causal selectivity. These results are relevant to a theoretical account of consciousness, because for integrated information theory the spatiotemporal maximum of integrated information fixes the spatiotemporal scale of consciousness. More generally, these results show that the notions of macro causal emergence and micro causal exclusion hold when causal power is assessed in full and from the intrinsic perspective of a system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nc/niw012

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchronization of micro-scale phenomena into larger groupings on meso- and macro-scales could be viewed as a kind of informational closure and coarse-graining.

    “This synchronization of micro-scale phenomena into larger groupings on meso- and macro-scales could be viewed as a kind of informational closure and coarse-graining (Hoel et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2019).”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Hoel et al., 2016

    The Coarse-graining section (p. 3) describes grouping micro elements into macro elements across spatial and temporal scales, supporting the coarse-graining part of the claim. Our copy does not describe those groupings as synchronization or call them informational closure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to IIT, the quality of an experience is fully accounted for by a complex's cause-effect structure, with no additional ingredients.

    “Finally, IIT claims that the quality of an experience-“what it is like to be” in a specific phenomenal state-is fully accounted for, with no additional ingredients, by that complex's cause-effect structure”
  • In principle, all possible grains should be considered.

    “In principle, however, all possible grains should be considered [33, 34].”
  • The grain is defined by the principle of maximal existence: across possible micro- and macroscopic levels, the winning grain is the one that ensures maximally irreducible existence for the entity to which the units belong.

    “Once again, the grain is defined by the principle of maximal existence: across the possible micro- and macroscopic levels, the “winning” grain is the one that ensures maximally irreducible existence () for the entity to which the units belong [33, 34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoel, E. P., Albantakis, L., Marshall, W., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tononi, Giulio
Venue
Neuroscience of Consciousness
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Issue
1
Pages
niw012
ISSN
2057-2107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514120153
Cited by
140
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience of Consciousness (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
integrated information theory, causal powers, spatial and temporal scales, coarse-graining, indeterminism, degeneracy, consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review