CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,324Mental Health and PsychiatrySchizophrenia research and treatmentPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Schizophrenia, Consciousness, and the Self

Sass, L. A., Parnas, J.·2003·Schizophrenia Bulletin
DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years, there has been much focus on the apparent heterogeneity of schizophrenic symptoms. By contrast, this article proposes a unifying account emphasizing basic abnormalities of consciousness that underlie and also antecede a disparate assortment of signs and symptoms. Schizophrenia, we argue, is fundamentally a self-disorder or ipseity disturbance (ipse is Latin for "self" or "itself") that is characterized by complementary distortions of the act of awareness: hyperreflexivity and diminished self-affection. Hyperreflexivity refers to forms of exaggerated self-consciousness in which aspects of oneself are experienced as akin to external objects. Diminished self-affection or self-presence refers to a weakened sense of existing as a vital and self-coinciding source of awareness and action. This article integrates recent psychiatric research and European phenomenological psychiatry with some current work in cognitive science and phenomenological philosophy. After introducing the phenomenological approach along with a theoretical account of normal consciousness and self-awareness, we turn to a variety of schizophrenic syndromes. We examine positive, then negative, and finally disorganization symptoms-attempting in each case to illuminate shared distortions of consciousness and the sense of self. We conclude by discussing the possible relevance of this approach for identifying early schizophrenic symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,324

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Parnas, J.
ORCID
Parnas, J.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
427-444
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017
OpenAlex
W2159675987
Cited by
1,324
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 51
FWCI
65.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
schizophrenia, consciousness
MeSH terms
Affect, Consciousness, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review