Cited by 187Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: Pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task

Open access
Silk, Jennifer S., Stroud, Laura R., Siegle, Greg J., Dahl, Ronald E., Lee, Kyung Hwa, Nelson, Eric E.·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

We developed an ecologically valid virtual peer interaction paradigm--the Chatroom Interact Task in which 60 pre-adolescents and adolescents (ages 9-17 years) were led to believe that they were interacting with other youth in a simulated internet chatroom. Youth received rejection and acceptance feedback from virtual peers. Findings revealed increased pupil dilation, an index of increased activity in cognitive and affective processing regions of the brain, to rejection compared to acceptance trials, which was greater for older youth. Data from a cell-phone Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) protocol completed following the task indicated that increased pupillary reactivity to rejection trials was associated with lower feelings of social connectedness with peers in daily life. Eyetracking analyses revealed attentional biases toward acceptance feedback and away from rejection feedback. Biases toward acceptance feedback were stronger for older youth. Avoidance of rejection feedback was strongest among youth with increased pupillary reactivity to rejection, even in the seconds leading up to and following rejection feedback. These findings suggest that adolescents are sensitive to rejection feedback and seek to anticipate and avoid attending to rejection stimuli. Furthermore, the salience of social rejection and acceptance feedback appears to increase during adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsr044

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Steinberg, L., Silk, J.S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In: Bornstein, M.H., editor. Handbook of Parenting: Vol. 1: Children and Parenting. 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 103-33.
  2. Szabadi, E., Bradshaw, C.M. (1996). Autonomic pharmacology of 2-adrenoceptors. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 10(Suppl. 3); 6-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silk, J. S., Stroud, L. R., Siegle, G. J., Dahl, R. E., Lee, K. H., & Nelson, E. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2011-08-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
93-105
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2139616223
Cited by
187
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh (UL1RR024153, RR024153)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL‐1 RR024153)
  • National Institutes of Health (RR024153)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091327)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024144)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-024153, UL1RR024153)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social rejection, social acceptance, peer acceptance, peer rejection, pupil dilation, pupil reactivity, attentional bias, adolescents, preadolescents, social connectedness, ecological momentary assessment, rejection avoidance, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Attention, Brain, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Pupil, Psychological Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review