Cited by 294Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

“I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self- and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults

Open access
Pfeifer, Jennifer H., Lieberman, Matthew D., Dapretto, Mirella·2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging research with adults suggests that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and the medial posterior parietal cortex (MPPC) are engaged during self-knowledge retrieval processes. However, this has yet to be assessed in a developmental sample. Twelve children and 12 adults (average age = 10.2 and 26.1 years, respectively) reported whether short phrases described themselves or a highly familiar other (Harry Potter) while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. In both children and adults, the MPFC was relatively more active during self- than social knowledge retrieval, and the MPPC was relatively more active during social than self-knowledge retrieval. Direct comparisons between children and adults indicated that children activated the MPFC during self-knowledge retrieval to a much greater extent than adults. The particular regions of the MPPC involved varied between the two groups, with the posterior precuneus engaged by adults, but the anterior precuneus and posterior cingulate engaged by children. Only children activated the MPFC significantly above baseline during self-knowledge retrieval. Implications for social cognitive development and the processing functions performed by the MPFC are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1323

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bilateral TPJ, mPPC, and mPFC are centrally implicated in self-referential processing.

    “All three regions are also centrally implicated in self-referential processing (D’Argembeau et al., 2007; Northoff et al., 2011; Pfeifer et al., 2007; Pfeifer et al., 2009; Pfeifer & Peake, 2011), raising the possibility that making safe decisions in such an amplified social-evaluative context may be more salient to adolescents’ social self-concept, although perhaps in a sample of high-risk teens”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Manual for the child behavioral checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  2. Frey KS, Ruble DN. Strategies for comparative evaluation: Maintaining a sense of competence across the life span. In: Sternberg RJ, Kolligan J Jr, editors. Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall GS. Adolescence. Vol. 2. New York: D. Appleton; 1904. [Google Scholar]
  4. Harter S. The self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  5. Marsh HW. Self description questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mutti M, Sterling H, Martin N, Spalding N. Quick neurological screening test ii. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeifer, J. H., Lieberman, M. D., & Dapretto, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
1323-1337
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2097816537
Cited by
294
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
27.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH075299, F31MH075299)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642, RR 13642, RR00865, M01RR000865, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, social cognition development, children versus adults, self-other distinction, autobiographical memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Brain Mapping, Child, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Parietal Lobe, Mental Recall, Self Concept, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review