Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toxicity of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate in Male Cynomolgus Monkeys after Oral Dosing for 6 Months

Butenhoff, J.·2002·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) is a processing aid in the production of fluoropolymers that has been shown to have a long half-life in human blood. To understand the potential toxicological response of primates, groups of male cynomolgus monkeys were given daily po (capsule) doses of either 0, 3, 10, or 30 (reduced to 20) mg/kg/day for 26 weeks. Two monkeys from each of the control and 10 mg/kg/day dose groups were observed for 90 days after the last dose. Clinical observations, clinical chemistry, determination of key hormones, gross and microscopic pathology, cell proliferation, peroxisomal proliferation, bile-acid determination, and serum and liver perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations were monitored. Toxicity, including weight loss and reduced food consumption, was noted early in the study at the 30 mg/kg/day dose; therefore, the dose was reduced to 20 mg/kg/day. The same signs of toxicity developed in 3 monkeys at 20 mg/kg/day, after which treatment of these monkeys was discontinued. One 30/20 mg/kg/day monkey developed the signs of toxicity noted above and a possible dosing injury, and this monkey was sacrificed in extremis on Day 29. A 3 mg/kg/day dose-group monkey was sacrificed in extremis on Day 137 for reasons not clearly related to APFO treatment. Dose-dependent increases in liver weight as a result of mitochondrial proliferation occurred in all APFO-treated groups. Histopathologic evidence of liver injury was not observed at either 3 or 10 mg/kg/day. Evidence of liver damage was seen in the monkey sacrificed in moribund condition at the highest dose. Body weights were decreased at 30/20 mg/kg. PFOA concentrations in serum and liver were highly variable, were not linearly proportional to dose, and cleared to background levels within 90 days after the last dose. A no observable effect level was not established in this study, and the low dose of 3 mg/kg/day was considered the lowest observable effect level based on increased liver weight and uncertainty as to the etiology leading to the moribund sacrifice of one low-dose monkey on Day 137. Other than those noted above, there were no APFO-related macroscopic or microscopic changes, changes in clinical chemistry, hormones, or urinalysis, or hematological effects. In particular, effects that have been associated with the development of pancreatic and testicular toxicity in rats were not observed in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/69.1.244

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Butenhoff, J.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
244-257
ISSN
1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105954461
Cited by
259
References
3
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.