Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mouse brain proteomics establishes MDGA1 and CACHD1 as in vivo substrates of the Alzheimer protease BACE1

Rudan Njavro, Jasenka, Klotz, Jakob, Dislich, Bastian, Wanngren, Johanna, Shmueli, Merav D., Herber, Julia, Kuhn, Peer‐Hendrik, Kumar, Rohit, Koeglsperger, Thomas, Conrad, Marcus, Wurst, Wolfgang, Feederle, Regina, Vlachos, Andreas, Michalakis, Stylianos, Jedlicka, Peter, Müller, Stephan A., Lichtenthaler, Stefan F.·2020·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

The protease beta‐site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) has fundamental functions in the nervous system. Its inhibition is a major therapeutic approach in Alzheimer's disease, because BACE1 cleaves the amyloid precursor protein (APP), thereby catalyzing the first step in the generation of the pathogenic amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide. Yet, BACE1 cleaves numerous additional membrane proteins besides APP. Most of these substrates have been identified in vitro, but only few were further validated or characterized in vivo. To identify BACE1 substrates with in vivo relevance, we used isotope label‐based quantitative proteomics of wild type and BACE1‐deficient (BACE1 KO) mouse brains. This approach identified known BACE1 substrates, including Close homolog of L1 and contactin‐2, which were found to be enriched in the membrane fraction of BACE1 KO brains. VWFA and cache domain‐containing protein 1 (CACHD)1 and MAM domain‐containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor protein 1 (MDGA1), which have functions in synaptic transmission, were identified and validated as new BACE1 substrates in vivo by immunoblots using primary neurons and mouse brains. Inhibition or deletion of BACE1 from primary neurons resulted in a pronounced inhibition of substrate cleavage and a concomitant increase in full‐length protein levels of CACHD1 and MDGA1. The BACE1 cleavage site in both proteins was determined to be located within the juxtamembrane domain. In summary, this study identifies and validates CACHD1 and MDGA1 as novel in vivo substrates for BACE1, suggesting that cleavage of both proteins may contribute to the numerous functions of BACE1 in the nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.201902347r

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APP is a poor substrate for BACE1.

    “It is well acknowledged that APP is a poor substrate for BACE1”

    From BACE1: More than just a β‐secretase (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Nearly 70 BACE1 substrates have been identified to date.

    “through secretome enrichment experiments, nearly 70 BACE1 substrates have been identified to date.”

    From BACE1: More than just a β‐secretase (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

  • CACHD1 and NCAM1/2 are involved in synapse formation, maturation, and maintenance.

    “Cache domain containing protein‐1 (CACHD1) and neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM1 and 2) are involved in synapse formation, maturation, and maintenance.”

    From BACE1: More than just a β‐secretase (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.15252/embj.201899456 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-012944 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.01.002 · DOI
  4. Johnson N, 2017, Quantitative proteomics screen identifies a substrate repertoire of rhomboid protease RHBDL2 in human cells and implicates it in epithelial homeostasis, Sci Rep, 7283, 10.1038/s41598-017-07556-3 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.09.005 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.10.003 · DOI
  7. 10.1242/dev.076398 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.001 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/mcp.M115.048298 · DOI
  10. 10.15252/embj.201488375 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/emboj.2012.173 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1074/jbc.M112.444703 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008477 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.M112.377465 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1074/mcp.M114.041533 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.26508/lsa.201800026 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.286.5440.735 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.1072994 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Volloch V, 2018, Results of beta secretase‐inhibitor clinical trials support amyloid precursor protein‐independent generation of beta amyloid in sporadic Alzheimer's disease, Med Sci (Basel, Switzerland), 6, E45
  20. 10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/emboj.2013.146 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nn1797 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.018 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s00429-019-01836-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M112.415505 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00810-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04551.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2766-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00227-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1074/jbc.M505249200 · DOI
  34. Vassar R, 2019, Editorial: implications for BACE1 inhibitor clinical trials: adult conditional BACE1 knockout mice exhibit axonal organization defects in the hippocampus, J Prev Alzheimer's Dis, 6, 78, 10.14283/jpad.2019.3 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/85064 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nmeth.1322 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/nmeth.3901 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.091062498 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/256495a0 · DOI
  42. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-10.2010 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.7554/eLife.12748 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkm475 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.048 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1213677110 · DOI
  48. 10.1167/iovs.04-1503 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.12.013 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/pmic.201200582 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.033 · DOI
  52. Cottrell GS, 2018, CACHD1 is an alpha2delta‐like protein that modulates CaV3 voltage‐gated calcium channel activity, J Neurosci, 38, 9186, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3572-15.2018 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/jm049379g · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/375754a0 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/34910 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1038/19077 · DOI
  57. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00012.x · DOI
  58. 10.1074/jbc.M109266200 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092279 · DOI
  60. Nguyen QA, 2016, Distinct roles for extracellular and intracellular domains in neuroligin function at inhibitory synapses, eLife, 5, e19236, 10.7554/eLife.19236 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.conb.2019.01.002 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/emmm.201101084 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1002/dvdy.22496 · DOI
  64. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4935-05.2006 · DOI
  65. 10.1083/jcb.201206028 · DOI
  66. 10.1073/pnas.1219987110 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.109 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.034 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.009 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/ncb1602 · DOI
  71. 10.1074/jbc.M414648200 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/nature19321 · DOI
  73. Jay SD, 1991, Structural characterization of the dihydropyridine‐sensitive calcium channel alpha 2‐subunit and the associated delta peptides, J Biol Chem, 266, 3287, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)49986-3 · DOI
  74. De Jongh KS, 1990, Subunits of purified calcium channels. Alpha 2 and delta are encoded by the same gene, J Biol Chem, 265, 14738, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)77174-3 · DOI
  75. 10.1242/jcs.035683 · DOI
  76. 10.15252/emmm.201809695 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/313756a0 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90334-4 · DOI
  79. 10.15252/embj.201797390 · DOI
  80. 10.3233/JAD-2011-101065 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.3390/cells8030209 · DOI
  82. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000608 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.002 · DOI
  84. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30726 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rudan Njavro, J., Klotz, J., Dislich, B., Wanngren, J., Shmueli, M. D., Herber, J., Kuhn, P., Kumar, R., Koeglsperger, T., Conrad, M., Wurst, W., Feederle, R., Vlachos, A., Michalakis, S., Jedlicka, P., Müller, S. A., & Lichtenthaler, S. F.
Affiliations
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
  • Division of Neurogeriatrics Department of NVS Center for Alzheimer Research Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
  • Institute of Developmental Genetics Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
  • Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
  • Department of Neuroanatomy Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Germany
  • Department of Ophthalmology Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich Germany
  • Faculty of Medicine ICAR3R ‐ Interdisciplinary Centre for 3Rs in Animal Research Justus‐Liebig‐University Giessen Germany
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-27
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
2465-2482
ISSN
  • 0892-6638
  • 1530-6860
Cited by
28
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2145 SyNergy, project ID 390857198, JE 528/6‐1, FOR 2290)
  • Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (15038)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review