Cited by 308Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesPharmaceutical studies and practices

An Open Trial of Guanfacine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Hunt, Robert D., Arnsten, Amy F.T., Asbell, Matthew D.·1995·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Medications such as clonidine have been shown to facilitate calming, to enhance frustration tolerance, and to reduce aggression in hyperactive children. The use of guanfacine (Tenex), an alpha 2 noradrenergic agonist similar to clonidine, was studied as an alternative because of its longer excretion half-life, decreased sedative side effects, and more selective binding profile. Method Thirteen psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with ADHD were rated at baseline and while taking guanfacine to determine its efficacy as a treatment for ADHD. Comparisons of Conners parent ratings within subject were used to measure behavioral changes in the subjects. Results During guanfacine treatment, patients' mean scores improved significantly overall (1.27 off, 0.85 on, t = 2.55, p Conclusions This preliminary study indicates that guanfacine is a beneficial and useful treatment of ADHD, reducing hyperactive behaviors and enabling greater attentional ability with minimal side effects. We are currently collecting data in a double-blind study measuring guanfacine's efficacy with and in comparison to methylphenidate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199501000-00013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guanfacine relieves cardinal symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents, including improved impulse control and better regulation of attention, in early small trials and later large Phase III studies.

    “Guanfacine has been shown to relieve cardinal symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents, including improved impulse control and better regulation of attention, in early, small trials (Hunt et al., 1995, Scahill et al., 2001), and later in multiple, large Phase III studies”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunt, R. D., Arnsten, A. F. T., & Asbell, M. D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Hunt, Robert D.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
50-54
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982166376
Cited by
308
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
guanfacine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, ADHD medication, hyperactivity, inattention, sedative side effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Guanfacine, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review