Cited by 158Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and DisordersRetinal and Macular Surgery

MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE MACULA IN EYES WITH DISCIFORM AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

KIM, S. Y., SADDA, S., PEARLMAN, J., HUMAYUN, M. S., de JUAN, E., MELIA, B. M., GREEN, W. R.·2002·Retina

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the extent of neural cell death in eyes with disciform age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Six eyes with disciform degeneration at various stages and five age-matched control eyes were selected for morphometric analysis using digitized light microscopic images. Disciform scars were classified as subneurosensory retinal, subretinal pigment epithelial, or combined lesions. The nuclei of the ganglion cell, inner nuclear, and outer nuclear layers were counted in contiguous 100 microm segments spanning a distance from 1,500 microm nasal to 1,500 microm temporal to the fovea. RESULTS: The outer nuclear layer was most severely attenuated in eyes with disciform scars, demonstrating a 69.4% reduction in cell number relative to control eyes. A loss in retinal ganglion cells (by 7.3%) and an increase in inner nuclear layer cells (by 10%) were observed, but these changes were not significant. Photoreceptor loss was most pronounced when the disciform scar was not covered by the retinal pigment epithelium. CONCLUSION: The nuclei of the outer nuclear layer are significantly attenuated in eyes with disciform age-related macular degeneration, while the ganglion cell and inner nuclear layers are relatively preserved. These findings suggest that replacement of outer nuclear function, by either retinal transplantation or implantation of the intraocular retinal prosthesis, might be a feasible therapeutic option for patients with this condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006982-200208000-00012

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KIM, S. Y., SADDA, S., PEARLMAN, J., HUMAYUN, M. S., de JUAN, E., MELIA, B. M., & GREEN, W. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Retina
Published
2002-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
471-477
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992625034
Cited by
158
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Retina (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
photoreceptor loss, outer nuclear layer, retinal ganglion cells, inner nuclear layer, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal cell death, retinal transplantation
MeSH terms
Aged, Cell Count, Cell Nucleus, Female, Humans, Interneurons, Macula Lutea, Macular Degeneration, Male, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Cell Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review