Cited by 51Endometriosis Research and TreatmentAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Proteomics Analysis of Plasma for Early Diagnosis of Endometriosis

Fassbender, Amelie, Waelkens, Etienne, Verbeeck, Nico, Kyama, Cleophas M., Bokor, Attila, Vodolazkaia, Alexandra, Van de Plas, Raf, Meuleman, Christel +6 more·2012·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that differential surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry protein or peptide expression in plasma can be used in infertile women with or without pelvic pain to predict the presence of laparoscopically and histologically confirmed endometriosis, especially in the subpopulation with a normal preoperative gynecologic ultrasound examination. METHODS: Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis was performed on 254 plasma samples obtained from 89 women without endometriosis and 165 women with endometriosis (histologically confirmed) undergoing laparoscopies for infertility with or without pelvic pain. Data were analyzed using least squares support vector machines and were divided randomly (100 times) into a training data set (70%) and a test data set (30%). RESULTS: Minimal-to-mild endometriosis was best predicted (sensitivity 75%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 63-89; specificity 86%, 95% CI 71-94; positive predictive value 83.6%, negative predictive value 78.3%) using a model based on five peptide and protein peaks (range 4.898-14.698 m/z) in menstrual phase samples. Moderate-to-severe endometriosis was best predicted (sensitivity 98%, 95% CI 84-100; specificity 81%, 95% CI 67-92; positive predictive value 74.4%, negative predictive value 98.6%) using a model based on five other peptide and protein peaks (range 2.189-7.457 m/z) in luteal phase samples. The peak with the highest intensity (2.189 m/z) was identified as a fibrinogen β-chain peptide. Ultrasonography-negative endometriosis was best predicted (sensitivity 88%, 95% CI 73-100; specificity 84%, 95% CI 71-96) using a model based on five peptide peaks (range 2.058-42.065 m/z) in menstrual phase samples. CONCLUSION: A noninvasive test using proteomic analysis of plasma samples obtained during the menstrual phase enabled the diagnosis of endometriosis undetectable by ultrasonography with high sensitivity and specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e31823fda8d

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combination of 5 peptide peaks discovered by SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry detected endometriosis with sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 84% in the menstrual phase.

    “A combination of 5 peptide peaks, discovered by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, detected endometriosis with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 84% in the menstrual phase [91].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Peptide fingerprinting using proteomic analysis of plasma may have utility as a noninvasive or semi-invasive diagnostic for endometriosis.

    “Peptide fingerprinting using proteomic analysis of plasma may also have utility as a noninvasive or semi-invasive diagnostic for endometriosis.20”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. triosis using artificial neural networks and protein fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2460-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fassbender, A., Waelkens, E., Verbeeck, N., Kyama, C. M., Bokor, A., Vodolazkaia, A., Van de Plas, R., Meuleman, C., Peeraer, K., Tomassetti, C., Gevaert, O., Ojeda, F., De Moor, B., & DʼHooghe, T.
Affiliations
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2012-02
Volume
119
Issue
2, Part 1
Pages
276-285
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158537745
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
endometriosis, plasma proteomics, early diagnosis, infertility, pelvic pain, menstrual cycle phases, luteal phase, non-invasive biomarkers, least squares support vector machine, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Proteins, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Menstruation, Predictive Value of Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Proteomics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review