Cited by 22Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and Health

Coffee Intake and Risk of Hypertension: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study

Klag, Michael J., Wang, Nae-Yuh, Meoni, Lucy A., Brancati, Frederick L., Cooper, Lisa A., Liang, Kung-Yee, Young, J. Hunter, Ford, Daniel E.·2002·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Methods: We assessed coffee intake in a cohort of 1017 white male former medical students (mean age, 26 years) in graduating classes from 1948 to 1964 up to 11 times over a median follow-up of 33 years. Blood pressure and incidence of hypertension were determined annually by self-report, demonstrated to be accurate in this cohort. Results: Consumption of 1 cup of coffee a day raised systolic blood pressure by 0.19 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.35) and diastolic pressure by 0.27 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.39) after adjustment for parental incidence of hypertension and time-dependent body mass index, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and physical activity in analyses using generalized estimating equations. Compared with nondrinkers at baseline, coffee drinkers had a greater incidence of hypertension during follow-up (18.8% vs 28.3%; P=.03). Relative risk (95% confidence interval) of hypertension associated with drinking 5 or more cups a day was 1.35 (0.87-2.08) for baseline intake and 1.60 (1.06-2.40) for intake over follow-up. After adjustment for the variables listed above, however, these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Over many years of follow-up, coffee drinking is associated with small increases in blood pressure, but appears to play a small role in the development of hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.162.6.657

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Klag et al. (2002), no association between caffeinated coffee consumption and risk of incident hypertension was observed after adjusting for confounding variables in normotensive young males.

    “No association between caffeinated coffee consumption and the risk of incident hypertension was observed after adjusting for confounding variables in the study by Klag et al. (2002) in normotensive young males.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Klag et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klag, M. J., Wang, N.-Y., Meoni, L. A., Brancati, F. L., Cooper, L. A., Liang, K.-Y., Young, J. H., & Ford, D. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2002-03-25
Volume
162
Issue
6
Pages
657
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W75331067
Cited by
4
References
28
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-01760)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK02856, DK07732)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00035)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
coffee consumption, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure, white men, hypertension incidence, cardiovascular risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review