Cited by 118Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance

Jeukendrup, Asker E, Chambers, Edward S·2010·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carbohydrate during exercise has been demonstrated to improve exercise performance even when the exercise is of high intensity (>75% VO2max) and relatively short duration (approximately 1 h). It has become clear that the underlying mechanisms for the ergogenic effect during this type of activity are not metabolic but may reside in the central nervous system. RECENT FINDINGS: Carbohydrate mouth rinses have been shown to result in similar performance improvements. This would suggest that the beneficial effects of carbohydrate feeding during exercise are not confined to its conventional metabolic advantage but may also serve as a positive afferent signal capable of modifying motor output. These effects are specific to carbohydrate and are independent of taste. The receptors in the oral cavity have not (yet) been identified and the exact role of various brain areas is not clearly understood. Further research is warranted to fully understand the separate taste transduction pathways for simple and complex carbohydrates and how these differ between mammalian species, particularly in humans. SUMMARY: Carbohydrate is detected in oral cavity by unidentified receptors and this can be linked to improvements in exercise performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e328339de83

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection of carbohydrate by receptors in the oral cavity, independent of sweetness, activates certain centers in the brain to enhance perceptions of effort and pacing decisions.

    “Indeed, there is robust evidence that the detection of CHO by receptors in the oral cavity, independent of sweetness, activates certain centers in the brain to enhance perceptions of effort and pacing decisions (see Jeukendrup & Chambers, 2010).”

    From Contemporary Nutrition Strategies to Optimize Performance in Distance Runners and Race Walkers (2019) · cites this paper as Jeukendrup & Chambers, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeukendrup, A. E., & Chambers, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Jeukendrup, Asker E
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2010-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
447-451
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985352497
Cited by
118
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
exercise performance, carbohydrate mouth rinse, central nervous system, afferent signals, motor output, taste transduction, high-intensity exercise, ergogenic aids
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Carbohydrates, Humans, Motor Activity, Mouth, Physical Endurance, Taste, Signal Transduction, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review