Cited by 437Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on 1-h cycle time trial performance

CARTER, JAMES M., JEUKENDRUP, ASKER E., JONES, DAVID A.·2004·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE AND METHOD: To investigate the possible role of carbohydrate (CHO) receptors in the mouth in influencing exercise performance, seven male and two female endurance cyclists (VO(2max) 63.2 +/- 2.7 (mean +/- SE) mL.kg*(-1).min(-1)) completed two performance trials in which they had to accomplish a set amount of work as quickly as possible (914 +/- 40 kJ). On one occasion a 6.4% maltodextrin solution (CHO) was rinsed around the mouth for every 12.5% of the trial completed. On the other occasion, water (PLA) was rinsed. Subjects were not allowed to swallow either the CHO solution or water, and each mouthful was spat out after a 5-s rinse. RESULTS: Performance time was significantly improved with CHO compared with PLA (59.57 +/- 1.50 min vs 61.37 +/- 1.56 min, respectively, P = 0.011). This improvement resulted in a significantly higher average power output during the CHO compared with the PLA trial (259 +/- 16 W and 252 +/- 16 W, respectively, P = 0.003). There were no differences in heart rate or rating of perceived exertion (RPE) between the two trials (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that carbohydrate mouth rinse has a positive effect on 1-h time trial performance. The mechanism responsible for the improvement in high-intensity exercise performance with exogenous carbohydrate appears to involve an increase in central drive or motivation rather than having any metabolic cause. The nature and role of putative CHO receptors in the mouth warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000147585.65709.6f

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbohydrate feeding may improve exercise performance via non-metabolic effects through direct effects on the central nervous system.

    “Such data suggest that CHO feeding may also improve exercise performance via non-metabolic effects but through direct effects on the central nervous system [44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARTER, J. M., JEUKENDRUP, A. E., & JONES, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2004-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
2107-2111
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038127987
Cited by
437
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate mouth rinse, maltodextrin, carbohydrate receptors, endurance cycling, time trial performance, exercise performance, central drive, motivation, output power, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Mouth, Mouthwashes, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Polysaccharides, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review