Cited by 76Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Acute and long-term effects of exercise on appetite control: is there any benefit for weight control?

Hopkins, Mark, King, Neil A, Blundell, John E·2010·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the relationship between energy intake, appetite control and exercise, with particular reference to longer term exercise studies. This approach is necessary when exploring the benefits of exercise for weight control, as changes in body weight and energy intake are variable and reflect diversity in weight loss. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence indicates that longer term exercise is characterized by a highly variable response in eating behaviour. Individuals display susceptibility or resistance to exercise-induced weight loss, with changes in energy intake playing a key role in determining the degree of weight loss achieved. Marked differences in hunger and energy intake exist between those who are capable of tolerating periods of exercise-induced energy deficit, and those who are not. Exercise-induced weight loss can increase the orexigenic drive in the fasted state, but for some this is offset by improved postprandial satiety signalling. SUMMARY: The biological and behavioural responses to acute and long-term exercise are highly variable, and these responses interact to determine the propensity for weight change. For some people, long-term exercise stimulates compensatory increases in energy intake that attenuate weight loss. However, favourable changes in body composition and health markers still exist in the absence of weight loss. The physiological mechanisms that confer susceptibility to compensatory overconsumption still need to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e32833e343b

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, M., King, N. A., & Blundell, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, Mark
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2010-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
635-640
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012285073
Cited by
76
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G530141/1, BBS/B/05079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
physical activity, appetite regulation, energy intake, weight management, exercise-induced weight loss, hunger, satiety, fasting state, body composition, eating behaviour
MeSH terms
Appetite, Appetite Regulation, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Satiation, Time, Weight Loss, Exercise, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review