Cited by 164Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The effect of an incremental increase in exercise on appetite, eating behaviour and energy balance in lean men and women feeding ad libitum

Open access
Whybrow, Stephen, Hughes, Darren A., Ritz, Patrick, Johnstone, Alexandra M., Horgan, Graham W., King, Neil, Blundell, John E., Stubbs, R. James·2008·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The effects of incremental exercise on appetite, energy intake (EI), expenditure (EE) and balance (EB) in lean men and women were examined. Six men (age 29·7 ( sd 5·9) years, weight 75·2 ( sd 15·3) kg, height 1·75 ( sd 0·11) m) and six women (age 24·7 ( sd 5·9) years, weight 66·7 ( sd 9·10) kg, height 1·70 ( sd 0·09) m) were each studied three times during a 16 d protocol, corresponding to no additional exercise (Nex), moderate-intensity exercise (Mex; 1·5–2·0 MJ/d) and high-intensity exercise (Hex; 3·0–4·0 MJ/d) regimens. Subjects were fed to EB during days 1–2, and during days 3–16 they fed ad libitum from a medium-fat diet of constant composition. Daily EE, assessed using the doubly labelled water method, was 9·2, 11·6 and 13·7 MJ/d ( P < 0·001; sed 0·45) for the women and 12·2, 14·0 and 16·7 MJ/d ( P = 0·007; sed 1·11) for the men on the Nex, Mex and Hex treatments, respectively. EI was 8·3, 8·6 and 9·9 MJ/d ( P = 0·118; sed 0·72) for the women and 10·6, 11·6 and 12·0 MJ/d ( P = 0·031; sed 0·47) for the men, respectively. On average, subjects compensated for about 30 % of the exercise-induced energy deficit. However, the degree of compensation varied considerably among individuals. The present study captured the initial compensation in EI for exercise-induced energy deficits. Total compensation would take a matter of weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114508968240

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Siri WE (1961) Body composition from fluid spaces and den- sity: analysis of methods. In Techniques for Measuring Body Composition, pp. 223-244 [
  2. Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA & Southgate DAT (1991) McCance and Widdowson's The Compo- sition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
  3. Coward WA & Cole TJ (1991) The doubly labelled water method for the measurement of energy expenditure in humans: risks and benefits. In New Techniques in Nutritional Research, pp. 139-176 [RG Whitehead and A Prentice, editors]. London: Academic Press.
  4. Coward WA (1989) Calculation of pool sizes and flux rates. In The Doubly Labelled Water Method for Measuring Energy Expenditure: Technical Recommendations for Use in Humans. A Consensus Report by the IDECG Working Group, pp. 48-68 [AM Prentice, editor]. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  5. Stricker EM & Verbalis JG (1999) Fluid intake and homeosta- sis. In Fundamental Neuroscience, pp. 1091 -1109 [
  6. EMJ Zigmond, F Bloom, SC Landis, JL Roberts and LR Squire, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  7. Stricker EM (2000) Specific appetites and homeostatic systems. In Neural and Metabolic Control of Macronutrient Intake, pp. 856-872 [

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whybrow, S., Hughes, D. A., Ritz, P., Johnstone, A. M., Horgan, G. W., King, N., Blundell, J. E., & Stubbs, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Whybrow, Stephen
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2008-11
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
1109-1115
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W1517453470
Cited by
164
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/B/05079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
eating behaviour, energy balance, energy intake, energy expenditure, ad libitum feeding, lean individuals, sex differences, high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Appetite, Energy Intake, Calorimetry, Indirect, Diet, Drinking, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hunger, Male, Time Factors, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review