Cited by 50Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseNutritional Studies and Diet

Artificial sweeteners: a place in the field of functional foods? Focus on obesity and related metabolic disorders

Raben, Anne, Richelsen, Bjørn·2012·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial sweeteners can be a helpful tool to reduce energy intake and body weight and thereby risk for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Considering the prevailing diabesity (obesity and diabetes) epidemic, this can, therefore, be an important alternative to natural, calorie-containing sweeteners. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the effect of artificial sweeteners on body weight, appetite, and risk markers for diabetes and CVD in humans. RECENT FINDINGS: Short-term intervention studies have shown divergent results wrt appetite regulation, but overall artificial sweeteners cannot be claimed to affect hunger. Data from longer term intervention studies are scarce, but together they point toward a beneficial effect of artificial sweeteners on energy intake, body weight, liver fat, fasting and postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and/or lipidemia compared with sugar. Epidemiological studies are not equivocal, but large cohort studies from the USA point toward decreased body weight and lower risk of type-2 diabetes and coronory heart diseases with increased intake of artificial sweeteners compared with sugar. SUMMARY: Artificial sweeteners, especially in beverages, can be a useful aid to maintain reduced energy intake and body weight and decrease risk of type-2 diabetes and CVD compared with sugars. However, confirmative long-term intervention trials are still needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e328359678a

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on animal experiments and limited human data, artificial and non-nutritive sweeteners may not be benign, with potential impact on cognitive processes, oral-gastrointestinal taste receptors, glucose-insulin and energy homeostasis, metabolic hormones, and the gut microbiome.

    “However, based on animal experiments and limited human data, these artificial and non-nutritive sweeteners may not be benign, with potential impact on cognitive processes (e.g., reward, taste perception), oral-gastrointestinal taste receptors and glucose-insulin and energy homeostasis, metabolic hormones, and the gut microbiome.262-265”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raben, A., & Richelsen, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Raben, Anne
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2012-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
597-604
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995329924
Cited by
50
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
artificial sweeteners, energy intake, body weight, appetite regulation, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, glycemia, insulin levels, liver fat, sugar-sweetened beverages, diabesity, obesity
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetite, Beverages, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hunger, Metabolic Diseases, Obesity, Sweetening Agents, United States, Weight Loss, Prevalence, Functional Food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review