The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 19 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Numerous theories have proposed that acute and chronic stressors may exert a cumulative effect on life-span health by causing biological “wear and tear,” or allostatic load, which in turn promotes disease. Very few studies have directly tested such models, though, partly because of the challenges associated with efficiently assessing stress exposure over the entire life course. To address this issue, we developed the first online system for systematically assessing lifetime stress exposure, called the Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN), and describe its initial validation here. Methods: Adults recruited from the community (n = 205) were administered the STRAIN, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form, and Perceived Stress Scale, as well as measures of socioeconomic status, personality, social desirability, negative affect, mental and physical health complaints, sleep quality, computer-assessed executive function, and doctor-diagnosed general health problems and autoimmune disorders. Results: The STRAIN achieved high acceptability and was completed relatively quickly (mean = 18 minutes 39 seconds; interquartile range = 12–23 minutes). The structure of the lifetime stress data best fit two latent classes overall and five distinct trajectories over time. Concurrent associations with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form and Perceived Stress Scale were good (r values = .147–.552). Moreover, the STRAIN was not significantly related to personality traits or social desirability characteristics and, in adjusted analyses, emerged as the measure most strongly associated with all six of the health and cognitive outcomes assessed except current mental health complaints (β values = .16–.41; risk ratios = 1.02–1.04). Finally, test-retest reliability for the main stress exposure indices over 2–4 weeks was excellent (r values = .904–.919). Conclusions: The STRAIN demonstrated good usability and acceptability; very good concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity; and excellent test-retest reliability.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The Adult STRAIN is a self- or interviewer-administered online measure of lifetime stress exposure that showed high usability, excellent test-retest reliability, and good concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity in a community sample of 205 adults. It predicted six health/cognitive outcomes and generally outperformed the CTQ-SF and PSS, though the study was largely cross-sectional and the sample was not racially diverse.
Key findings
- Participants completed the STRAIN in an average of 18 minutes 39 seconds; completion rate was 90.8% among 369 who began, and negative affect did not change from pre- to post-STRAIN (M = 1.65 vs. 1.67, p = .341, d = 0.03).
- Participants reported an average of 25.77 lifetime stressors (SD = 16.85; range 1–83) and an average overall severity score of 63.26 (SD = 37.73). Latent class analysis found two groups: low-stress (n = 116; M = 13.90 stressors) and high-stress (n = 89; M = 41.25 stressors); latent trajectory analysis found five trajectories.
- Concurrent validity: lifetime stressor count correlated with CTQ-SF (r = .552, p < .001) and PSS (r = .147, p = .035). Discriminant validity: it was not significantly associated with Big Five traits or social desirability (p values ≥ .08), whereas the PSS correlated with all five Big Five traits (|r| ≥ .17).
- Predictive validity: lifetime stressor count predicted self-reported current health complaints (r = .321 and r = .469), worse sleep quality (r = .493), poorer executive function (r = .185), more doctor-diagnosed general health problems (RR = 1.026, 95% CI = 1.019–1.034), and more doctor-diagnosed autoimmune disorders (RR = 1.034, 95% CI = 1.017–1.051). Test-retest reliability over about 2 weeks was r = .919 for total lifetime stressor count and r = .904 for total severity; all main indices had r ≥ .873.
Methods
- Community-based online sample of 205 adults (96 men, 107 women, 2 transgender; mean age = 37.82 years, SD = 11.72, range 19–68; 85.4% white). A randomly selected 100 participants completed the STRAIN again after a median of 13 days (range 9–36) for test-retest reliability, with 100% compliance.
- Lifetime stress exposure was assessed with the Adult STRAIN, which enquires about 55 stressors (26 acute life events, 29 chronic difficulties) across 2 stressor types, 12 life domains, and 5 social-psychological characteristics. Other measures included the CTQ-SF, PSS, Ten Item Personality Inventory, Social Desirability Scale, PANAS negative affect, Stroop task, PSQI, K-6, PHQ, and doctor-diagnosed general health and autoimmune conditions.
- Analyses used R 3.2.5; correlations and linear models for continuous outcomes, generalized linear models for count outcomes, latent class analysis with mclust (1–9 Gaussian clusters, BIC-selected), and latent trajectory analysis with flexmix using a quintic polynomial.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: the design was largely cross-sectional except for the test-retest portion, so causation cannot be assumed; STRAIN scores are self-reported and could still be influenced by unmeasured reporting biases or by recently occurring stressors; no biological samples were collected; and the sample was not particularly diverse with respect to race or ethnicity.
- Stated by the paper: future work should test longer test-retest intervals, larger and more diverse samples, different cultures and languages, comparison with interview-based expert-rated measures, and predictive validity against biological and clinical outcomes less susceptible to self-report bias.
- Evident from the text: the sample was a convenience online sample with a high attention-check failure/dropout rate before the final 205 were retained (45.7% of respondents), which may further limit generalizability beyond the stated racial/ethnic diversity concern.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
57 Own result · 16 Own method · 16 Own interpretation · 9 Not checked yet · 3 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“males experienced more legal/crime stressors (p = .011)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Stress Exposure by Timing, Type, Life Domain, and Core Social-Psychological Characteristic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and significantly (but more weakly) correlated with participants' PSS total score (r = .147, p = .035)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“females experienced more stressors in the life domains of treatment/health (p < .001)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Stress Exposure by Timing, Type, Life Domain, and Core Social-Psychological Characteristic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the STRAIN demonstrated good concurrent validity with the CTQ-SF and PSS”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the two primary indices of lifetime stress exposure—namely, total lifetime stressor count and total lifetime stressor severity—achieved test-retest reliabilities of r = .919, p < .001, and r = .904, p < .001, respectively”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Test-Retest Reliability
plaincorrelationaln = 100 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, negative affect did not change from pre-STRAIN (M = 1.65, SD = 0.83) to post-STRAIN (M = 1.67, SD = 0.85; t(170) = −0.96, p = .341, d = 0.03)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Usability and Acceptability of the STRAIN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“as well as worse sleep quality over the preceding month (β = .362, p < .001)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelationaln = 205 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and physical health complaints (β = .401, p < .001)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelationaln = 205 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“marginally more physical danger and humiliation stressors (p values < .057)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Stress Exposure by Timing, Type, Life Domain, and Core Social-Psychological Characteristic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and poorer executive function (r = .185, p = .008).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 21
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In comparison, in unadjusted bivariate associations, the CTQ-SF was significantly correlated with neuroticism in an unadjusted bivariate correlation (r = .148, p = .035), but this association was no longer significant when adjusting for age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status (β = .08, p = .269).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although acute life events and chronic difficulties both yielded significant associations”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Stress Exposure by Timing, Type, Life Domain, and Core Social-Psychological Characteristic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As summarized in Table 2, overall stressor count was associated with participants' sex (F(2,202) = 5.05, p = .007), age (r =.185, p = .008), and socioeconomic status (r = −.290, p < .001), but was unrelated to race (F(4,199) = 0.54, p = .708).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Descriptive Statistics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed the classic Stroop effect in this study, with participants exhibiting longer reaction times for incongruent than for congruent words (Mdiff = 119.5 milliseconds, t(204) = 25.78, p < .001).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Cognitive Measures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In unadjusted bivariate associations, lifetime stressor count was not significantly associated with any of the Big Five personality traits, with or without adjusting for covariates, nor was it related to social desirability (p values ≥ .08).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average time to complete the STRAIN was 18 minutes and 39 seconds (interquartile range = 11 minutes 45 seconds–22 minutes 58 seconds).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Usability and Acceptability of the STRAIN
plainn = 205- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“marginally more physical danger and humiliation stressors (p values < .057)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Stress Exposure by Timing, Type, Life Domain, and Core Social-Psychological Characteristic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“participants completed the STRAIN in approximately 18 minutes.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, the CTQ-SF was not significantly associated with any of the health or cognitive outcomes measured, and the PSS was associated with only half of the outcomes measured.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the STRAIN was the measure that correlated most strongly with every outcome assessed except for current mental health complaints, which was predicted more strongly by the PSS.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PSS, in contrast, was positively or negatively correlated with all five Big Five personality traits (i.e., openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism; |r values| ≥ .17, p values ≤ .014) and marginally inversely correlated with social desirability (r = −.128, p = .068).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These participants reported that the STRAIN was “interesting” and “easy-to-use.””
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Usability and Acceptability of the STRAIN
plainn = 205- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The resulting consensus from this body of work is that acute life events (e.g., getting divorced or fired from a job) and chronic difficulties (e.g., ongoing marital or financial problems) increase risk for a wide variety of mental and physical health problems, including anxiety disorders, depression, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and Alzheimer's disease (6–10).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Cohen S Janicki-Deverts D Miller GE Psychological stress and disease. JAMA 2007; 298: 1685– 7. 17925521 source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Kendler KS Karkowski LM Prescott CA Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 837– 41. 10360120 source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Krantz DS Kop WJ Santiago HT Gottdiener JS Mental stress as a trigger of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Cardiol Clin 1996; 14: 271– 87. 8724559 source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Leserman J Role of depression, stress, and trauma in HIV disease progression. Psychosom Med 2008; 70: 539– 45. 18519880 source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Slavich GM Life stress and health: a review of conceptual issues and recent findings. Teach Psychol 2016; 43: 346– 55. 27761055 PMC5066570 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these 205 participants, 100 individuals, selected at random, were followed over time to examine the test-retest reliability of the STRAIN, with 100% compliance.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Participants and Procedure
plainn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reported mental and physical health in the general population (33,34).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > INTRODUCTION > Stress and Adversity Inventory: An Overview
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Lam JCW Shields GS Trainor BC Slavich GM Yonelinas AP Greater lifetime stress exposure predicts blunted cortisol but heightened DHEA reactivity to acute stress, 2017 Under review. PMC6377358 30110520 source
- Not matchedcites [28] Kurtzman L O'Donovan A Koslov K Arenander J Epel ES Slavich GM Sweating the big stuff: dispositional pessimism exacerbates the deleterious effects of life stress on metabolic health. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2012; 3.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [29] Goldfarb EV Shields GS Daw ND Slavich GM Phelps EA Low lifetime stress exposure is associated with reduced stimulus-response memory. Learn Mem 2017; 24: 162– 8. 28298555 PMC5362698 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All study procedures were approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, Los Angeles.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Participants and Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants completed all of the measures online and data were retained for those who answered all of the questions without failing the attention checks (45.7% of respondents).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Participants and Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stressors were originally identified for possible inclusion in the STRAIN using a seven-step process.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Life Stress Measures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Internal consistency for this scale was excellent, α = .92.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Demographic and Potential Confounding Factors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Internal consistency for this scale was excellent, α = .94.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Life Stress Measures
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When this stress response is repeatedly engaged or prolonged, however, biological “wear and tear”—sometimes referred to as allostatic load—occurs (14), and greater allostatic load in turn increases risk for disease and premature mortality (14,15).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] McEwen BS Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 840: 33– 44. 9629234 source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Lupien SJ McEwen BS Gunnar MR Heim C Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 434– 45. 19401723 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The K-6 and PHQ both demonstrated very good internal consistency (α = .91 and α = .84, respectively).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > METHODS > Health Measures
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“classic theories of stress, which posit that different stressors have similar biobehavioral consequences (53).”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Selye H The evolution of the stress concept. Am Sci 1973; 61: 692– 9. 4746051
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, then, the STRAIN exhibited outstanding predictive validity and outperformed the CTQ-SF and PSS in all but one instance.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To examine the comparative predictive validity of the STRAIN, CTQ-SF, and PSS, we conducted analyses that included each instrument simultaneously, and that adjusted for participants' age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and negative affect.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because the study design was largely cross sectional (with the exception of the longitudinal test-retest portion), all of the results are correlational, and causation, therefore, cannot be assumed.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The discriminant validity of the STRAIN is thus slightly better than the CTQ-SF and substantially better than the PSS.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“scores on the STRAIN are based on participants' reports, and although we assessed associations between these scores and participants' personality and social desirability characteristics, self-reporting biases could still have influenced the results in unmeasured ways.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, responses to the STRAIN are not influenced by personality traits or by social desirability.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recently occurring stressors could also have influenced participants' reports of the stressors they experienced over the life-span.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Namely, more lifetime stressors were experienced by females, older individuals, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Descriptive Statistics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“biological samples were not collected as part of this study”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, then, the STRAIN demonstrated excellent predictive validity across a variety of different health-related and cognitive outcomes, and these associations were robust while adjusting for participants' age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and negative affect.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“The STRAIN was also associated with several different aspects of health and cognition, including self-reported physical and mental health complaints, sleep quality, executive function, and doctor-diagnosed general health problems and autoimmune disorders.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
boostedcorrelationaln = 205 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the present data suggest that the STRAIN reliably assesses lifetime stress exposure in an inexpensive, user-friendly, noninvasive manner.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“males and females of differing ages were approximately equally represented in this study, but the present sample was not particularly diverse with respect to race or ethnicity.”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The STRAIN's lifetime stressor count provides an objective measure of stress exposure.
“permitting researchers to assess individuals' “objective” stress exposure (i.e., their lifetime stressor count) as well as their “subjective” stress experience (i.e., their lifetime stressor severity).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The STRAIN's 55 stressors comprehensively cover all acute life events and chronic difficulties an individual may experience over the life course.
“assessing all of the acute life events and chronic difficulties that an individual has experienced over his or her life course (51).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' retrospective reports of lifetime stressors are accurate enough to yield valid measures of lifetime stress exposure.
“scores on the STRAIN are based on participants' reports”
“self-reporting biases could still have influenced the results in unmeasured ways”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“its parent instrument, the Adult STRAIN, exhibited excellent test-retest reliability over 2–4 weeks (rs = 0.904–0.919 for the main stress indices) in a recent validation study (Slavich and Shields 2018).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Slavich and Shields 2018
In the citing paper
“The classification system that designates which stressor falls into which category was created during the initial development and validation of the STRAIN and was informed by an exhaustive review of the life stress literature, the structure of gold-standard stress assessment instruments, and consultations with stress assessment experts (see Slavich and Shields 2018).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Slavich and Shields 2018
In the citing paper
“Higher Adult STRAIN scores have also been associated with worse mental and physical health, as well as poorer cognitive, biological, clinical functioning across several different studies and distinct health contexts (e.g., Bower et al. 2014; Cuneo et al. 2017; Dooley et al. 2017; Goldfarb et al. 2017; Lam et al. 2019; Shields et al. 2017a, b; Slavich and Shields 2018; Toussaint et al. 2016).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Slavich and Shields 2018
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(204) = 25.78reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(204) = 25.78, p < .001”
- Consistentt(170) = -0.96reported p = .341 · recomputed p = .338
“t(170) = −0.96, p = .341”
- ConsistentF(2, 202) = 5.05reported p = .007 · recomputed p = .007
“F(2,202) = 5.05, p = .007”
- ConsistentF(4, 199) = 0.54reported p = .708 · recomputed p = .707
“F(4,199) = 0.54, p = .708”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
“Lifetime stressor count was significantly associated with more self-reported current physical health complaints (r = .321, p < .001) and physical health complaints (r = .469, p < .001)”
§ Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation > RESULTS > Validity
“Lifetime stressor count as assessed by the STRAIN strongly predicted each of the six health-related outcomes assessed, including current physical health complaints, current mental health complaints, sleep difficulties over the past month, executive dysfunction, and doctor-diagnosed general health problems and autoimmune disorders.”
Citations
Cites
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234 · cited 4×
“BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, CTQ-SF = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form, K-6 = Kessler 6-Item Psychological Distress Inventory, PHQ = Physical Health Questionnaire, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory, PSS = Perceived Stress Scale, STRAIN = Stress and Adversity Inventory”
MethodInfluentialA Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807 · cited 3×
“BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, CTQ-SF = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form, K-6 = Kessler 6-Item Psychological Distress Inventory, PHQ = Physical Health Questionnaire, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory, PSS = Perceived Stress Scale, STRAIN = Stress and Adversity Inventory”
MethodDevelopment and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433 · cited 2×
“Negative Affect Participants' levels of negative affect over the past week were assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (40).”
MethodDiamond, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 · Cited by 13,268 · cited 1×
“, GREEN, written in green font) and 60 were color-word incongruent (GREEN, written in blue font), which engages both facets of inhibitory control—namely, response inhibition and interference control (45).”
BackgroundKESSLER, R. C., ANDREWS, G., COLPE, L. J., HIRIPI, E., MROCZEK, D. K., NORMAND, S.-L. T., WALTERS, E. E., & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074 · Cited by 10,327 · cited 6×
“We used the Kessler 6-Item Psychological Distress Inventory (K-6) (48) and the Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ) (49) to assess mental health and physical health, respectively, over the preceding month.”
MethodInfluentialA very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 · Cited by 8,307
Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., et al. (2003) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0 · Cited by 6,419 · cited 1×
“Childhood Adversity Participants' levels of childhood adversity were measured using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form (CTQ-SF; (35)).”
MethodEffects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition
Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2639 · Cited by 6,256
Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load
McEWEN, B. S. (1998) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x · Cited by 5,092
(1988) · Cited by 4,111
The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target
Miller, A. H., & Raison, C. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2015.5 · Cited by 3,942
Psychological Stress and Disease
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.14.1685 · Cited by 3,168
Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress
Epel, E. S., Blackburn, E. H., Lin, J., Dhabhar, F. S., Adler, N. E., Morrow, J. D., & Cawthon, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407162101 · Cited by 3,002
Causal Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and the Onset of Major Depression
Kendler, K. S., Karkowski, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.837 · Cited by 2,566
Slavich, G. M., & Irwin, M. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035302 · Cited by 2,206
Self-citationjsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser
de Leeuw, J. R. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y · Cited by 1,899 · cited 1×
“Executive Function Participants' executive function ability was assessed using a version of the Stroop task scripted in jsPsych (41), which has been extensively validated”
MethodThe Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17)
Stöber, J. (2001) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222 · Cited by 762 · cited 1×
“Participants' tendency to exhibit social desirability was assessed using the 17-item Social Desirability Scale (39).”
MethodEvolution of the Stress Concept
McCarty, R. C. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190697266.003.0003 · Cited by 715
Role of depression, stress, and trauma in HIV disease progression
Leserman, J. (2008) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181777a5f · Cited by 662
Modern Approaches to Conceptualizing and Measuring Human Life Stress
Monroe, S. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141207 · Cited by 621
Dohrenwend, B. P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.477 · Cited by 601 · cited 1×
“However, an equally likely contributor involves the fact that many stress assessment instruments include items that are not sufficiently precise to enable consistent reporting over time (22).”
BackgroundThe Emerging Field of Human Social Genomics
Slavich, G. M., & Cole, S. W. (2013) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613478594 · Cited by 523
Self-citationKemeny, M. E. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01246 · Cited by 519
Brown, G. W., Harris, T. O., & Hepworth, C. (1995) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170002804x · Cited by 483
Black sheep get the blues: a psychobiological model of social rejection and depression
Slavich, G. M., O’Donovan, A., Epel, E. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.003 · Cited by 362
Self-citationSchat, A. C. H., Kelloway, E. K., & Desmarais, S. (2005) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.363 · Cited by 344 · cited 6×
“We used the Kessler 6-Item Psychological Distress Inventory (K-6) (48) and the Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ) (49) to assess mental health and physical health, respectively, over the preceding month.”
MethodInfluentialStress, age, and immune function: toward a lifespan approach
Graham, J. E., Christian, L. M., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9057-4 · Cited by 329
Life Stress and Health: A Review of Conceptual Issues and Recent Findings
Slavich, G. M. (2016) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628316662768 · Cited by 300
Self-citationRetrospective Reporting of Childhood Adversity: Issues in Assessing Long-Term Recall
Maughan, B., & Rutter, M. (1997) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1997.11.1.19 · Cited by 292 · cited 1×
“This is frequently assumed to be caused by individuals' inability to accurately remember stressors that have occurred in the distant (or even recent) past (52).”
BackgroundStressful life events, social support, and mortality in men born in 1933
Rosengren, A., Orth-Gomér, K., Wedel, H., & Wilhelmsen, L. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1102 · Cited by 275
Toussaint, L., Shields, G. S., Dorn, G., & Slavich, G. M. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314544132 · Cited by 253 · cited 1×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
ResultSelf-citationThe evolution of the stress concept.
Selye, H. (1973) · PubMed · Cited by 251
Shields, G. S., & Slavich, G. M. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12335 · Cited by 244 · cited 2×
“As summarized in Table 2, overall stressor count was associated with participants' sex (F(2,202) = 5.”
BackgroundSelf-citationde Leeuw, J. R., & Motz, B. A. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0567-2 · Cited by 242
Reaction time effects in lab- versus Web-based research: Experimental evidence
Hilbig, B. E. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0678-9 · Cited by 224
Knutson, K. L., Rathouz, P. J., Yan, L. L., Liu, K., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2006) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/29.11.1503 · Cited by 180 · cited 1×
“Participants' sleep quality was assessed using the 10-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) (46), which has been shown to have good testretest reliability over 1 year (47).”
MethodKrantz, D. S., Kop, W. J., Santiago, H. T., & Gottdiener, J. S. (1996) · Cardiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8651(05)70280-0 · Cited by 159
Targeted Rejection Predicts Hastened Onset of Major Depression
Slavich, G. M., Thornton, T., Torres, L. D., Monroe, S. M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.2.223 · Cited by 154
Self-citationA hassle a day may keep the doctor away: stress and the augmentation of immune function
Dhabhar, F. S. (2002) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/42.3.556 · Cited by 146
Psychosomatic and Psychoimmunologic Research1
Ader, R. (1980) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-198005000-00001 · Cited by 144
Dooley, L. N., Slavich, G. M., Moreno, P. I., & Bower, J. E. (2017) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2739 · Cited by 132
Self-citationLam, J. C. W., Shields, G. S., Trainor, B. C., Slavich, G. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2019) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2835 · Cited by 107
Self-citationShields, G. S., Moons, W. G., & Slavich, G. M. (2017) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890.2017.1286322 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
ResultSelf-citationChildhood Adversity and Cumulative Life Stress: Risk Factors for Cancer-Related Fatigue
Bower, J. E., Crosswell, A. D., & Slavich, G. M. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613496243 · Cited by 86 · cited 1×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
Self-citationAn Overly Permissive Extension
Kagan, J. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635593 · Cited by 86 · cited 2×
“001), but was unrelated to race (F(4,199) = 0.”
BackgroundSlavich, G. M., Tartter, M. A., Brennan, P. A., & Hammen, C. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.07.009 · Cited by 83
Self-citationOnline versus offline: The Web as a medium for response time data collection
Chetverikov, A., & Upravitelev, P. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0632-x · Cited by 79
Diurnal cortisol rhythms, fatigue and psychosocial factors in five-year survivors of ovarian cancer
Cuneo, M. G., Schrepf, A., Slavich, G. M., Thaker, P. H., Goodheart, M., Bender, D., Cole, S. W., Sood, A. K., & Lutgendorf, S. K. (2017) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.06.019 · Cited by 55 · cited 2×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationBush, N. R., Lane, R. D., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000421 · Cited by 44 · cited 1×
“As a result, although the theoretical literature on lifetime stress exposure and health is rich, the empirical literature is almost nonexistent, even though studies on this topic are critical for advancing our understanding of how stressors occurring across the life course exert a cumulative effect on health (20).”
BackgroundLow lifetime stress exposure is associated with reduced stimulus-response memory
Goldfarb, E. V., Shields, G. S., Daw, N. D., Slavich, G. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2017) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.045179.117 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
ResultSelf-citationPsychological Stressors, Overview
Monroe, S. M., & Slavich, G. M. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012373947-6.00317-2 · Cited by 23
Self-citationMalat, J., Jacquez, F., & Slavich, G. M. (2017) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890.2017.1341871 · Cited by 23
Self-citationKurtzman, L., O'Donovan, A., Koslov, K., Arenander, J., Epel, E., & Slavich, G. M. (2012) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.19401 · Cited by 13 · cited 2×
“This approach yielded eight preliminary studies, showing that the STRAIN predicts biological reactivity to acute stress (27), metabolic function (28), memory (29), diurnal cortisol levels in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (30), depression and fatigue in women diagnosed with breast cancer (31,32), and self-reporte…”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationSlavich, G. M., & Toussaint, L. L. (2013) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2523 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“The STRAIN aims to address this issue by providing investigators with an inexpensive, user-friendly, scalable, and reliable system for assessing all of the acute life events and chronic difficulties that an individual has experienced over his or her life course (51).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1980, Presidential address—1980. Psychosomatic and psychoimmunologic research, Psychosom Med, 42, 307
- 1996, Mental stress as a trigger of myocardial ischemia and infarction, Cardiol Clin, 14, 271
Cited by
Sorted by citations
More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., & Mendes, W. B. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 · Cited by 1,077
“The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) is an online system that measures a person’s lifetime exposure to 55 types of acute and chronic stressors that may affect health (Slavich and Shields, 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTen Surprising Facts About Stressful Life Events and Disease Risk
Cohen, S., Murphy, M. L. M., & Prather, A. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102857 · Cited by 531
“Another instrument, the Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) (Slavich & Shields 2018), is a participantcompleted computer assessment of lifetime cumulative exposure to stressors.”
MethodInfluentialA Longitudinal Big Data Approach for Precision Health
Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose, S. M., Contrepois, K., Moneghetti, K. J., Zhou, W., Mishra, T., Mataraso, S., Dagan-Rosenfeld, O., Ganz, A. B., Dunn, J., Hornburg, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0414-6 · Cited by 494
Self-citationSlavich, G. M. (2020) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045159 · Cited by 502
Self-citationSlavich, G. M., & Sacher, J. (2019) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05326-9 · Cited by 383
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Slavich, G. M., & Shields, G. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Slavich, George M.
- Venue
- Psychosomatic Medicine
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-27
- ISSN
- 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7796
- PMC
- PMC5757659
- OpenAlex
- W2923152359
- Semantic Scholar
- 3ac8d7509e928af2e1b16965795b32cb45f9963c
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH103443)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- allostatic load, cumulative stress, life course, stress trajectories, childhood trauma, perceived stress, online surveys, test-retest reliability, psychometric validation, health outcomes, autoimmune disease, sleep quality, executive function
- MeSH terms
- Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
