Cited by 40Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and Interventions

A Positive Psychology–Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Type 2 Diabetes: The BEHOLD-8 Controlled Clinical Trial

Open access
Huffman, Jeff C., Golden, Julia, Massey, Christina N., Feig, Emily H., Chung, Wei-Jean, Millstein, Rachel A., Brown, Lydia, Gianangelo, Taylor +4 more·2020·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Physical activity is associated with superior health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but most T2D patients do not follow physical activity recommendations. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of a novel combined positive psychology–motivational interviewing (PP-MI) intervention to promote physical activity in T2D. Methods: This controlled clinical trial compared an 8-week, phone-delivered PP-MI intervention to an attention-matched MI-enhanced behavioral counseling condition among 60 participants with T2D and suboptimal moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; <150 min/wk). The primary study outcome was feasibility (proportion of sessions completed) and acceptability (0–10 ease and utility ratings of each session). Secondary outcomes were between-group differences in changes in positive affect (main psychological outcome) and accelerometer-measured physical activity (MVPA and steps per day), using mixed-effects regression models, at 8 and 16 weeks. Results: Ninety-two percent of PP-MI sessions were completed, and mean participant ratings of ease/utility were 8.5 to 8.8/10, surpassing a priori benchmarks for feasibility and acceptability. PP-MI participants had small-medium effect size (ES) difference improvements in positive affect compared with MI (8 weeks: estimated mean difference [EMD] = 3.07 [SE = 1.41], p = .029, ES = 0.44; 16 weeks: EMD = 2.92 [SE = 1.73], p = .092, ES = 0.42). PP-MI participants also had greater improvements in MVPA (8 weeks: EMD = 13.05 min/d [SE = 5.00], p = .009, ES = 1.24; 16 weeks: EMD = 7.96 [SE = 4.53], p = .079, ES = 0.75), with similar improvements in steps per day. Conclusions: The PP-MI intervention was feasible and well accepted. Next-step efficacy studies can more rigorously explore the intervention’s effects on physical activity and clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration No. NCT03150199.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0000000000000840

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of positive psychology-based programs on cardiac biomarkers or other disease markers have been mixed, with some observed effects on markers of inflammation in small trials in patients with heart failure or coronary artery disease, modest effects on glycosylated hemoglobin in small studies in diabetes, but minimal effects on other markers.

    “Effects of such programs on cardiac biomarkers (eg, inflammatory markers, heart rate variability) or other disease markers have been mixed, with some observed effects on markers of inflammation in small trials in patients with heart failure 209 or coronary artery disease, 210 modest effects on glycosylated hemoglobin in small studies in diabetes, 206,207 but minimal effects on other”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [206]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A majority, but not all, of randomized studies found positive psychology-based interventions to be associated with greater improvements in physical activity compared with control conditions.

    “Several such programs, either alone or combined with motivational interviewing, have focused on the promotion of physical activity in patients with cardiac disease or cardiac risk conditions in randomized studies, with a majority, 203-207 but not all, 208 of such studies finding positive psychology-based interventions to be associated with greater improvements in physical activity compared”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 3rd ed New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huffman, J. C., Golden, J., Massey, C. N., Feig, E. H., Chung, W.-J., Millstein, R. A., Brown, L., Gianangelo, T., Healy, B. C., Wexler, D. J., Park, E. R., & Celano, C. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Huffman, Jeff C.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2020-07-14
Volume
82
Issue
7
Pages
641-649
ISSN
  • 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7796
OpenAlex
W3042567149
Cited by
40
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002541)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL123607, K23HL135277)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK109313, P30DK111022)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, positive psychology, motivational interviewing, physical activity promotion, positive affect, telephone-delivered intervention, feasibility and acceptability, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, step count, behavioral counseling
MeSH terms
Psychology, Positive, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Telephone, Exercise, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review