Cited by 327Stress Responses and CortisolMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsExercise and Physiological Responses

Stress, Inflammation, and Yoga Practice

Open access
Kiecolt-Glaser, Janice K., Christian, Lisa, Preston, Heather, Houts, Carrie R., Malarkey, William B., Emery, Charles F., Glaser, Ronald·2010·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To address the mechanisms underlying hatha yoga’s potential stress-reduction benefits, we compared inflammatory and endocrine responses of novice and expert yoga practitioners before, during, and after a restorative hatha yoga session, as well as in two control conditions. Stressors before each of the three conditions provided data on the extent to which yoga speeded an individual’s physiological recovery. Methods: A total of 50 healthy women (mean age, 41.32 years; range, 30–65 years), 25 novices and 25 experts, were exposed to each of the conditions (yoga, movement control, and passive-video control) during three separate visits. Results: The yoga session boosted participants’ positive affect compared with the control conditions, but no overall differences in inflammatory or endocrine responses were unique to the yoga session. Importantly, even though novices and experts did not differ on key dimensions, including age, abdominal adiposity, and cardiorespiratory fitness, novices’ serum interleukin (IL)-6 levels were 41% higher than those of experts across sessions, and the odds of a novice having detectable C-reactive protein (CRP) were 4.75 times as high as that of an expert. Differences in stress responses between experts and novices provided one plausible mechanism for their divergent serum IL-6 data; experts produced less lipopolysaccharide-stimulated IL-6 in response to the stressor than novices, and IL-6 promotes CRP production. Conclusion: The ability to minimize inflammatory responses to stressful encounters influences the burden that stressors place on an individual. If yoga dampens or limits stress-related changes, then regular practice could have substantial health benefits. CRC = Clinical Research Center; CRP = C-reactive protein; HR = heart rate; hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; MASQ = Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire; PANAS = Positive and Negative Affect Scale; PBLs = peripheral blood leukocytes; sIL-6r = soluble IL-6 receptor; TEWL = transepidermal water loss; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; JOURNAL/psme/04.03/00006842-201002000-00002/OV0312/v/2021-02-12T104333Z/r/image-pngo2 max = maximum oxygen consumption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3181cb9377

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Kullo IJ Khaleghi M Hensrud DD Markers of inflammation are inversely associated withVo(2max) in asymptomatic men J Appl Physiol 2007 102 1374 1379 17170204
  2. [34]Ruth S Mehrotra S Differentiating depression and anxiety: Psychometric implications of the tripartite model of affect Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies 2001 17 9 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Christian, L., Preston, H., Houts, C. R., Malarkey, W. B., Emery, C. F., & Glaser, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glaser, Ronald
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2010-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
113-121
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165834433
Cited by
327
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016058)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI055411)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025755, M01RR000034)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT002971)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
hatha yoga, stress reduction, inflammation, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, physiological recovery, endocrine response, positive affect, soluble IL-6 receptor, women, restorative yoga, stress response mechanisms, mood and anxiety symptoms, transepidermal water loss
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Aged, Complementary Therapies, C-Reactive Protein, Catecholamines, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Inflammation, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Psychoneuroimmunology, Stress, Psychological, Water Loss, Insensible, Yoga, Interleukin-6, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review